Part, Question

 1   2, 76  |      the case with madmen and ~imbeciles: but such is not always
 2   2, 14  |        instance in the case of imbeciles and ~madmen, as stated in
 3   2, 68  |      in the case of ~children, imbeciles and women, or to personal
 4   2, 73  |        defects of children and imbeciles: ~and then to make game
 5   2, 86  | lacking in children just as in imbeciles and madmen. Therefore just
 6   2, 86  |     madmen. Therefore just as ~imbeciles and madmen cannot bind themselves
 7   2, 86  |      reason, as in madmen and ~imbeciles, who cannot bind themselves
 8   3, 68  |         12) Whether madmen and imbeciles should be baptized?~Aquin.:
 9   3, 68  |         1/1~Whether madmen and imbeciles should be baptized?~Aquin.:
10   3, 68  |       It seems that madmen and imbeciles should not be baptized.
11   3, 68  |           But since madmen and imbeciles lack the use of ~reason,
12   3, 68  |        reason. But ~madmen and imbeciles lack the use of reason,
13   3, 68  |      neither should madmen and imbeciles in those cases be baptized.~
14   3, 68  |        suspended in madmen and imbeciles ~more than it is in one
15   3, 68  |        be given to madmen and ~imbeciles.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[68] A[
16   3, 68  |       the matter of madmen and imbeciles a distinction is to ~be
17   3, 68  |       1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Imbeciles who never had, and have
18   3, 68  |        Reply OBJ 2: Madmen and imbeciles lack the use of reason accidentally, ~
19   3, 68  |         stated in reference to imbeciles: thus Augustine relates
20 Suppl, 32|        conferred on madmen and imbeciles?~(4) Whether it should be
21 Suppl, 32|      to be given to madmen and imbeciles?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[32] A[
22 Suppl, 32|        be given to madmen and ~imbeciles. For these diseases are
23 Suppl, 32|        not apply to madmen and imbeciles. ~Therefore it should not
24 Suppl, 32|       especially to madmen and imbeciles, who might ~dishonor the