Part, Question

 1   2, 102|          weakness, to ~nocturnal pollution, or to sexual intercourse.
 2   2, 102|         distinguished a ~twofold pollution or uncleanness; one, that
 3   2, 150|    chastity is integrity free of pollution."~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[152]
 4   2, 150|      forfeit, because such like ~pollution is not the result of impurity
 5   2, 152| seduction?~(5) Whether nocturnal pollution is a mortal sin?~(6) Of
 6   2, 152|      Para. 1/1~Whether nocturnal pollution is a mortal sin?~Aquin.:
 7   2, 152|        would seem that nocturnal pollution is a sin. For the same ~
 8   2, 152|       asleep; and thus nocturnal pollution would seem to be a sin.~
 9   2, 152|       asleep, so that ~nocturnal pollution is not prevented by sleep
10   2, 152|         it seems ~that nocturnal pollution is a sin.~Aquin.: SMT SS
11   2, 152|         I answer that, Nocturnal pollution may be considered in two
12   2, 152|          2/5~Secondly, nocturnal pollution may be considered with reference
13   2, 152|          or drinking), nocturnal pollution has the ~character of sin
14   2, 152|          sinful cause, nocturnal pollution ~is not sinful, neither
15   2, 152|        second cause of nocturnal pollution is on the part of the soul
16   2, 152|        abhorrence. Now nocturnal pollution is more apt to arise from
17   2, 152|    consent to acts productive of pollution. ~In this sense the Philosopher
18   2, 152|        is evident that nocturnal pollution may be sinful ~on the part
19   2, 152|       may happen that nocturnal ~pollution ensues after thoughts about
20   2, 152|        to suffer ~from nocturnal pollution on festivals, and that the
21   2, 152|          manifest that nocturnal pollution is never a sin, but is sometimes
22   2, 152|       ways. First, ~by procuring pollution, without any copulation,
23   3, 80 |        it?~(7) Whether nocturnal pollution prevents man from receiving