Part, Question

 1   1, 50  |         4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Numerical multiplication, since it
 2   1, 62  |       account of the ~end; while numerical difference is because of
 3   1, 69  |        of the heaven, and is the numerical ~measure of the movement
 4   1, 51  |         4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Numerical multiplication, since it
 5   1, 63  |       account of the ~end; while numerical difference is because of
 6   1, 70  |        of the heaven, and is the numerical ~measure of the movement
 7   1, 84  |        not a specific but only a numerical ~difference: for different
 8   2, 30  | difference of species, but ~only numerical difference; a difference
 9   2, 4   |         This objection considers numerical diversity of faith.~Aquin.:
10   2, 23  |   charity, we must ~presuppose a numerical distinction between them,
11   2, 85  |         number (being the first ~numerical limit, since the figures
12   3, 2   |    Divine Person is greater than numerical ~unity, which is the principle
13   3, 2   |          nature of a part, as in numerical unity, which is a part of
14   3, 2   |       Incarnation is higher than numerical unity by reason of ~the
15   3, 3   |             Hence there can be a numerical multitude on the ~part of
16   3, 19  |          hypostasis ~springs the numerical unity as regards the operation
17 Suppl, 44|          of the subject there is numerical diversity. The fact ~of
18 Suppl, 76|         Further, there cannot be numerical identity where there is ~
19 Suppl, 76|         identity where there is ~numerical distinction of essential
20 Suppl, 76|      form, ~cannot be resumed in numerical identity. Therefore the
21 Suppl, 76|   generation to specific but not numerical ~identity, because from
22 Suppl, 77|          does this derogate from numerical identity, ~as neither does
23 Suppl, 93|      Reply OBJ 4: Although these numerical signs are a human institution, ~