Part, Question

 1   1, 18|     only with the motion of ~expansion and contraction; and thus
 2   1, 67|   night were ~then caused by expansion and contraction of light,
 3   1, 67|      for this vicissitude of expansion and contraction since there ~
 4   1, 68|   night were ~then caused by expansion and contraction of light,
 5   1, 68|      for this vicissitude of expansion and contraction since there ~
 6   2, 33|      of inquiry:~(1) Whether expansion is an effect of pleasure?~(
 7   2, 33|      Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether expansion is an effect of pleasure?~
 8   2, 33|    OBJ 1: It would seem that expansion is not an effect of pleasure.
 9   2, 33|     effect of pleasure. For ~expansion seems to pertain more to
10   2, 33| passion from love. Therefore expansion is not ~an effect of pleasure.~
11   2, 33|    yet possessed. ~Therefore expansion seems to belong to desire
12   2, 33|   contraction is contrary to expansion. But contraction ~seems
13   2, 33|  which pleases it. Therefore expansion does not pertain to pleasure. ~
14   2, 33|   derived ~from "dilatatio" [expansion], as stated above (Q[31],
15   2, 33|    save metaphorically. ~Now expansion denotes a kind of movement
16   2, 33|  likenesses. And in this way expansion pertains to love by ~reason
17   2, 33|    others. On the other hand expansion ~pertains to pleasure, in
18   2, 33|    Desire includes a certain expansion arising from the ~imagination
19   2, 33|      thing desired; but this expansion increases at the ~presence
20   2, 37|   the effect of ~pleasure is expansion: the opposite of which is
21   2, 37|  fervor is ascribed to love, expansion ~to pleasure, and depression
22   3, 84|    movement, for joy is with expansion [*Cf. FS, Q[33], ~A[1]]