Part, Question

 1   1, 78  |       simply and ~without mental discussion, as Dionysius says (Div.
 2   2, 3   |     imperfect, and ~after a long discussion, concludes: "We call men
 3   2, 87  |           absurd in a scientific discussion to wish to prove one's point
 4   2, 126 |         describes ~as being "the discussion and administration," i.e.
 5   2, 132 |          noble purpose of mind, ~discussion" referring to the inward
 6   2, 152 |         flesh for the purpose of discussion; while sometimes it is ~
 7   2, 178 |           and again the reason's discussion of ~the various signs or
 8   3, 27  |      unbelief, but of wonder and discussion. ~Thus Basil says (Ep. ad
 9   3, 75  |     division of the matter under discussion, as may ~be seen by referring
10 Suppl, 86| comprises two things, namely the discussion ~of merits and the payment
11 Suppl, 86|          merit. But there is no ~discussion of merits save where good
12 Suppl, 86|          are not ~subjected to a discussion of their merits. Such are
13 Suppl, 86|         they are subjected to a ~discussion of their merits, and consequently
14 Suppl, 86|         judgment as regards the ~discussion of merits concerns only
15 Suppl, 86|        works or merits requiring discussion. But ~believers in whom
16 Suppl, 86|        will ~be subjected to the discussion of merits. Consequently,
17 Suppl, 86|        passed on them without a ~discussion of their merits; whereas
18 Suppl, 86|     their merits be subjected to discussion, in order ~to make it clear
19 Suppl, 86|     answer that, The judgment of discussion nowise concerns either the ~
20 Suppl, 96|       description of our Lord's ~discussion with the damned and the
21 Suppl, 96|          and the elect. But this discussion is only ~about works of
22 Suppl, 96|        OBJ 2: The reason why the discussion refers only to the works