Part, Question
1 3, 80| Pope Gelasius says (cf. De Consecr. ii): "We have learned that ~
2 3, 80| Pope Gelasius adds (cf. De Consecr. ii), "because the ~dividing
3 3, 82| contrary, It is written (De Consecr., dist. 12): "It has come
4 3, 82| Can. v), and again (De Consecr., dist. 2): "It must be
5 3, 82| says upon Leviticus (cf. De Consecr., dist. 2): ~"It is lawful
6 3, 83| down in the Decretals (De Consecr., dist. i), ~Pope Leo I
7 3, 83| necessity; as is stated De Consecr., dist. 1.~Aquin.: SMT TP
8 3, 83| was born in the night (De Consecr., dist. ~1). And in like
9 3, 83| set down in the decree (De Consecr., dist. 1), in ~virtue of
10 3, 83| Nevertheless, as is said in De ~Consecr., dist. 1, "if a church
11 3, 83| God." Hence we read in De Consecr., dist. 1: "It has seemed ~
12 3, 83| Hence it is enacted (De Consecr., dist. ~1): "Let no priest
13 3, 83| Church, therefore we read (De Consecr., dist. 1): "It is ~not
14 3, 83| the same distinction (De Consecr.) it is said: ~"The solemnities
15 3, 83| OBJ 5: As we read in De Consecr., dist. 1, "altars, if not
16 3, 83| We find it stated in De Consecr., dist. 1, that "James, ~
17 3, 83| therefrom. Hence in De Consecr., dist. 1, it is laid down: "
18 3, 83| found in the ~Decretals (De Consecr., dist. ii), "the Lord's
19 3, 83| Hence, as is laid down (De Consecr., ~dist. ii), Pope Clement
20 3, 83| Hence Pope Soter says (De Consecr., dist. 1): ~"It has also
21 3, 83| that we find it decreed (De Consecr. dist. 1) that a ~bishop
22 3, 83| According to the decree, De Consecr., dist. ii, quoting a ~decree
|