Part, Question

 1   1, 2  |          exists in a general and confused way is ~implanted in us
 2   1, 14 |  acquires first a universal and ~confused knowledge of things, before
 3   1, 25 |      will be signified, but in a confused ~and general way. The sentence
 4   1, 31 |      several. We avoid the word "confused," lest we take away from
 5   1, 31 |         i): "What is one ~is not confused; and there is no multiplicity
 6   1, 39 |         is not to be taken in a ~confused sense." And (Contra Maxim.
 7   1, 39 |         is not to be taken in a ~confused sense." And (Contra Maxim.
 8   1, 84 |         in two ways. First, in a confused ~way, as existing in the
 9   1, 84 |    division into parts: because ~confused knowledge is prior to distinct
10   1, 88 |  imperfect, and of a general and confused nature. We ~can see this
11   1, 88 |          being perfect, would be confused and general. Therefore to
12   1, 88 |          but only a ~general and confused kind of knowledge. Separated
13   1, 88 |         species to imperfect and confused ~knowledge of natural things
14   1, 88 | knowledge, ~but in a general and confused manner.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
15   1, 88 |   knowledge of which we speak is confused. Hence it does not follow
16   1, 88 |   whereas separated ~have only a confused knowledge. Hence the angels,
17   1, 107|        would not be ordered, but confused, if ~there were not in it
18   1, 116|    things known in a general and confused manner; but not known in
19   2, 99 |       this article are not to be confused with the ~Commandments (
20   2, 73 |         conscience through being confused and ashamed at reprehensible
21   2, 156|          denotes ~disorderly and confused speech. The other disorder
22   3, 2  |     natures in Christ. The first confused the natures, as Eutyches