Part, Question

 1   1, 59 |        through the addition of some ~qualification.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
 2   1, 60 |        through the addition of some ~qualification.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
 3   1, 78 |            must we say, ~without any qualification, that a power, by which
 4   2, 26 |              ways, first so that the qualification "wholly" ~be referred to
 5   2, 131|            is ignorance of one's own qualification, and on the part of the
 6   3, 16 |             the ~Father"; but with a qualification, viz. "in His human nature."
 7   3, 16 |           whole simply, i.e. without qualification, for ~we do not say that
 8   3, 16 |            teeth; but we say without qualification that he is curly, since
 9   3, 16 |       however take as understood the qualification, "as man."~Aquin.: SMT TP
10   3, 16 |             be predicated without a ~qualification. Hence he afterwards adds (
11   3, 16 |              we may not say without ~qualification, "Christ is incorporeal"
12   3, 16 |              but we must say, with a qualification, that Christ was ~incorporeal
13   3, 16 |              be made use of without ~qualification; in order to avoid the heresy
14   3, 20 |           human nature, whether this qualification be added ~or not, as stated
15   3, 20 |          human nature, even ~if this qualification be not added; and yet it
16   3, 20 |            it is better to add this ~qualification in order to avoid the error
17   3, 20 |            attributed to Him ~with a qualification; so that we say that Christ
18   3, 20 |          attributed ~to Him with the qualification, in His human nature.~Aquin.:
19   3, 22 |             priesthood but with this qualification - in ~regard to the passibility
20   3, 24 | predestinated the Son of ~God," this qualification, "as Man," can be referred
21   3, 50 |            death simply and without ~qualification, is erroneous. Yet it can