Part, Question

 1   1, 64 |             not called evening, but "nocturnal" knowledge. Accordingly
 2   1, 65 |             not called evening, but "nocturnal" knowledge. Accordingly
 3   2, 102|         whether due to weakness, to ~nocturnal pollution, or to sexual
 4   2, 102|              vessels in honor of the nocturnal ~deities which they call "
 5   2, 152|               seduction?~(5) Whether nocturnal pollution is a mortal sin?~(
 6   2, 152|              Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether nocturnal pollution is a mortal sin?~
 7   2, 152|            OBJ 1: It would seem that nocturnal pollution is a sin. For
 8   2, 152|               while asleep; and thus nocturnal pollution would seem to
 9   2, 152|           sin while asleep, so that ~nocturnal pollution is not prevented
10   2, 152|              and thus it seems ~that nocturnal pollution is a sin.~Aquin.:
11   2, 152|             Para. 1/5~I answer that, Nocturnal pollution may be considered
12   2, 152|             Body Para. 2/5~Secondly, nocturnal pollution may be considered
13   2, 152|       excessive eating or drinking), nocturnal pollution has the ~character
14   2, 152|           not due to a sinful cause, nocturnal pollution ~is not sinful,
15   2, 152|          Para. 3/5~A second cause of nocturnal pollution is on the part
16   2, 152| concupiscence or of ~abhorrence. Now nocturnal pollution is more apt to
17   2, 152|              Thus it is evident that nocturnal pollution may be sinful ~
18   2, 152|             hand, it may happen that nocturnal ~pollution ensues after
19   2, 152|            ever wont to suffer ~from nocturnal pollution on festivals,
20   2, 152|           Hence it is ~manifest that nocturnal pollution is never a sin,
21   3, 80 |           approaches it?~(7) Whether nocturnal pollution prevents man from