Part, Question

 1   1, 19  |    Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The statements that evil exists, and that
 2   1, 19  |      contradictories; yet the statements that anyone wills evil ~
 3   1, 89  |      have originated from two statements of the ancients. ~For those
 4   2, 14  |    iron: and also any general statements known either through ~speculative
 5   2, 100 |   serve two masters," the two statements, ~"I am the Lord thy God,"
 6   2, 47  | reason proceeds from certain ~statements which are taken as primary:
 7   2, 108 |        however, any of ~their statements appear to be untruthful,
 8   2, 108 |      we must understand such ~statements to have been figurative
 9   2, 162 |         and also ~contrary to statements made in the FP, Q[90], A[
10   2, 165 |   philosophers made any true ~statements, we must claim them for
11   2, 167 |     bear in mind ~the general statements made above (A[1]) concerning
12   3, 27  |    combine two contradictory ~statements.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] A[
13 Suppl, 71|    being in opposition to the statements of holy ~men, and groundless
14 Suppl, 71|    fide dormierunt) that such statements are to be explained with ~
15 Suppl, 74|  would seem applicable to the statements ~of Abbot Joachim, who by
16 Suppl, 93|       1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the statements contained in Holy Writ stand
17 Suppl, 93|  taken as a criterion of ~the statements of Holy Writ: and it would
18 Suppl, 94|        and pretended that all statements as to souls being ~punished
19 Appen1, 2|  because it is opposed to the statements of holy men and of the ~
20 Appen2, 1|     more in keeping with the ~statements of holy men and the revelations