Part, Question

 1   1, 32  |       faith, indirectly, if the denial of it ~involves as a consequence
 2   1, 36  |         words of ~his express a denial thereof.~Aquin.: SMT FP
 3   1, 81  |    contingent propositions, the denial of ~which does not involve
 4   1, 81  |        which does not involve a denial of the first principles.
 5   1, 81  |     demonstrable conclusions, a denial of which involves a denial
 6   1, 81  |      denial of which involves a denial of the ~first principles.
 7   2, 35  |         of one contrary and the denial of the other, as, if I were
 8   2, 35  |  appetite, what affirmation and denial are to the intellect" ~(
 9   2, 41  |        are what affirmation and denial are in the ~intellect."
10   2, 41  |         in the ~intellect." But denial is nothing special in the
11   2, 100 |       thing always leads to the denial of its ~opposite: but the
12   2, 100 |       of its ~opposite: but the denial of one opposite does not
13   2, 108 |        faith is prescribed, and denial of faith is forbidden; for
14   2, 11  |         e.g. those matters, the denial of which leads to the ~corruption
15   2, 92  |         Therefore blasphemy and denial of the faith are ~more grievous
16   2, 107 |      less seems to ~amount to a denial of the truth, since this
17   2, 107 |        is incompatible with the denial of ~truth, whereas it is
18   3, 89  |    order. For ~Peter, after his denial, was made shepherd of Christ'
19   3, 89  | comments as follows: "After his denial ~and repentance Peter gives
20 Suppl, 55|        accusation is based on a denial of the contract having taken ~