Part, Question

 1   2, 87  | ecclesiastical orders, let him be degraded."~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[89] A[
 2   2, 113 |           and treachery ~shall be degraded from his office." Now such
 3   2, 183 |         that any man who has been degraded from the episcopal ~dignity
 4   2, 184 |         that any man who has been degraded from the episcopal dignity
 5   3, 64  |     Church, or excommunicated ~or degraded, he does not lose the power
 6   3, 82  |       this sacrament?~(8) Whether degraded priests can do so?~(9) Whether
 7   3, 82  |         Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether a degraded priest can consecrate this
 8   3, 82  |          1~OBJ 1: It seems that a degraded priest cannot consecrate
 9   3, 82  |          the priest "who has been degraded has no power of ~consecrating,
10   3, 82  |         Therefore it seems that a degraded priest cannot consecrate
11   3, 82  |     merely the ~use, for thus the degraded one would lose no more than
12   3, 82  |           in like fashion, if the degraded ~man be restored, he has
13   3, 82  |          consecrating, and so the degraded priest can ~perform this
14   3, 82  |           it is ~evident that the degraded priest can perform this
15   3, 82  |   exercise is ~withdrawn from the degraded, as though condemned perpetually.~
16 Suppl, 8 |           who are excommunicate, ~degraded, and so forth. Now whoever
17 Suppl, 19|      excommunicate, ~suspended or degraded, have the use of the keys?~
18 Suppl, 19|      excommunicate, suspended or ~degraded have the use of the keys?~
19 Suppl, 19|       excommunicate, suspended or degraded have the use of the keys.
20 Suppl, 38|           do those who have been ~degraded and the like. This is the