Part, Question
1 3, 54 | incorruptible; because it was palpable, as He ~Himself says in
2 3, 55 | incorruptible and at the same time palpable."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[55] A[
3 Suppl, 80| Whether a glorified body is palpable?~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[83] A[
4 Suppl, 80| because our Lord had a palpable body after the Resurrection, ~
5 Suppl, 80| xxv in Evang.): "What is palpable ~must needs be corruptible."
6 Suppl, 80| 2: Further, whatever is palpable resists one who handles
7 Suppl, 80| another body, ~it will not be palpable.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[83] A[
8 Suppl, 80| 1~OBJ 3: Further, every palpable body is tangible. Now every
9 Suppl, 80| body; and yet His ~body was palpable, as appears from Lk. 24:
10 Suppl, 80| glorified bodies also ~will be palpable.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[83] A[
11 Suppl, 80| 1/1~I answer that, Every palpable body is tangible, but not
12 Suppl, 80| tangible bodies: but a palpable body, in addition to this,
13 Suppl, 80| tangible indeed but not palpable. ~Accordingly it is clear
14 Suppl, 80| that a body is said to be palpable for two ~reasons, namely
15 Suppl, 80| therefore neither are they palpable. This is ~what Gregory means
16 Suppl, 80| Evang.) that "whatever is ~palpable must needs be corruptible."
17 Suppl, 80| nature the glorified body is ~palpable, but it is competent for
18 Suppl, 80| nature that whatever is palpable is corruptible, as stated
19 Suppl, 80| touching it, and thus it is ~palpable.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[83] A[
|