Part, Question

 1   1, 5   |      4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Mathematical entities do not subsist
 2   1, 7   |       4~The same applies to a mathematical body. For if we imagine
 3   1, 7   |    body. For if we imagine a ~mathematical body actually existing,
 4   1, 68  |     thereby differing from a ~mathematical body" as is remarked by
 5   1, 69  |     thereby differing from a ~mathematical body" as is remarked by
 6   1, 84  |     85] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 2/2~Mathematical species, however, can be
 7   2, 1   | multiplied to ~infinity: thus mathematical quantities have no limit.
 8   2, 9   |    about physical matter from mathematical principles, are reckoned
 9   2, 9   |    reckoned rather ~among the mathematical sciences, though, as to
10   2, 75  |     things is not fixed with ~mathematical precision, but depends on
11   3, 7   |   Reply OBJ 1: If we speak of mathematical quantity, addition can be
12   3, 46  |    passions, not according to mathematical quantity, but according
13   3, 77  |       from matter seems to be mathematical ~quantity, which is not
14   3, 77  |      4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Mathematical quantity abstracts not from
15   3, 77  |     without a subject, is not mathematical quantity.~Aquin.: SMT TP
16 Suppl, 80| considers it impossible for a mathematical body, which is nothing but ~
17 Suppl, 80|       applies to surfaces and mathematical bodies. And since matter
18 Suppl, 80|    case ~we are considering a mathematical line, which is understood
19 Suppl, 81|          The same ~applies to mathematical quantities: for instance