Part, Question

 1   1, 19  | hindered by the weakness of the limb. Therefore the effect ~of
 2   1, 48  |       as the surgeon cuts off a limb to save the whole body.
 3   1, 49  |       as the surgeon cuts off a limb to save the whole body.
 4   2, 6   |     i.e. as to that ~particular limb; but not simply, i.e. as
 5   2, 78  |          suffers ~the loss of a limb, that he may save his life
 6   2, 31  | possible, without cutting off a limb, ~but, if this be unavoidable,
 7   2, 31  |         unavoidable, cuts off a limb which is least ~indispensable,
 8   2, 60  |        as when a ~man has taken limb or life. Therefore it does
 9   2, 60  |      has deprived ~another of a limb, he must make compensation
10   2, 62  |  physician to cut off a decayed limb, when he has ~been entrusted
11   2, 62  |       man to cut ~off a decayed limb even from himself, that
12   2, 64  |     instance, if he amputates a limb), or as a person ~connected
13   2, 94  |    instance, the twitching of a limb; a ~stone, a dog, or a boy
14   2, 108 |       so a physician cuts off a limb, lest the whole body ~perish.
15   2, 184 |         latter are cut off as a limb." And ~Chrysostom says (
16   3, 8   |      believe, as if a ~lifeless limb were moved by a man to some
17 Suppl, 83|       like manner the lack of a limb would prevent pain from ~
18 Suppl, 83|      arises ~from the lack of a limb: thus we say that a mutilated
19 Appen1, 1|  disinherited or ~deprived of a limb through no fault of his.