Part, Question

 1   2, 96 |        he alone is competent to interpret the law who can make ~the
 2   2, 96 | Therefore they have no right to interpret the intention of the lawgiver, ~
 3   2, 96 |         it allowable for us ~to interpret harshly, and render burdensome,
 4   2, 96 |         the lawgiver, does not ~interpret the law simply; but in a
 5   2, 111|      with divers tongues and to interpret speeches have special ~efficacy
 6   2, 30 |       For thus does the Apostle interpret it (1 ~Tim. 4:8) where he
 7   2, 58 |        to himself, a man should interpret doubtful matters for the
 8   2, 58 |        1/1~Reply OBJ 3: One may interpret something for the worst
 9   2, 58 |   lesser evil. ~Secondly we may interpret something for the best or
10   2, 58 |        things we ~should try to interpret each thing according as
11   2, 58 |         judging ~of persons, to interpret things for the best as stated
12   2, 58 |       is it allowable for us to interpret harshly, and render ~burdensome,
13   2, 58 |        to the same authority to interpret ~and to make a law, just
14   2, 93 |       OBJ 2: Further, those who interpret dreams, properly speaking,
15   2, 118|       to the sovereign alone to interpret the intention of the ~lawgiver,
16   2, 118|    lawful that We alone ~should interpret between equity and law."
17   2, 174|         easily found someone to interpret their words faithfully to
18   2, 174|       of ~thee, that thou canst interpret obscure things, and resolve
19   2, 174|     tongues; ~unless perhaps he interpret." Yet the interpretation