Part, Question

 1   1, 4  |    reproduces man; or in ~a more eminent degree, if it is an equivocal
 2   1, 4  |       pre-exist in God in a more eminent way. Dionysius implies ~
 3   1, 13 |      pre-exists in Him in a more eminent way than can be understood
 4   1, 13 | perfections are in God in a more eminent way than in creatures. Now
 5   1, 13 |     signification, but in a more eminent way. Hence ~Dionysius says
 6   1, 26 |  pre-exists wholly and in a more eminent degree in the ~divine beatitude.
 7   1, 30 |        belongs to God ~in a more eminent manner than to creatures.
 8   1, 48 |         and in its place, is the eminent ~commendation of what is
 9   1, 55 |    several ~things. But if it be eminent, then it can be taken as
10   1, 61 |          the universe in a more ~eminent way. But an angel is a part
11   1, 49 |         and in its place, is the eminent ~commendation of what is
12   1, 56 |    several ~things. But if it be eminent, then it can be taken as
13   1, 62 |          the universe in a more ~eminent way. But an angel is a part
14   1, 83 |          higher things in a more eminent way than in themselves,
15   1, 85 |        power can, but in a ~more eminent way. Wherefore what the
16   1, 105|       science; and some also are eminent in ~one kind of science,
17   1, 105|    universal as regards the more eminent mode of knowledge.~Aquin.:
18   1, 107|          possessed thereby in an eminent manner, as we have stated (
19   2, 65 |         man with regard to some ~eminent state, such as magnificence