Part, Question

 1   1, 48 |          loss, ~Pain of sense." - Ed.]~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[
 2   1, 49 |          loss, ~Pain of sense." - Ed.]~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[48] A[
 3   1, 86 | translation rendered ~"passive" - Ed.]. Therefore in its essence
 4   2, 11 | Philosopher states in Metaph. iv; Ed. Did. iii, 5), for this
 5   2, 56 | Philosopher (Metaph. ix) ~[*Didot ed., viii, 8]. Therefore since
 6   2, 56 |       stated in Metaph. x [*Didot ed., ix, 5; Cf. Ethic. v, 4]:
 7   2, 77 |  according to Metaph. ~x [*Didot. ed. ix, 4]. Wherefore a thing
 8   2, 86 |          according to Metaph. v [*Ed. Did. iv, ~5]. Therefore,
 9   2, 93 |         is proved in Metaph. vi [*Ed. Did. ~v, 3], an accidental
10   2, 161|        greatest ~(Metaph. ii, 4 [*Ed. Diel. i, 1]). Now the sin
11   2, 178|       says (Metaph. ii, text. 3 [*Ed Did. ia, 1]) that "the end
12   2, 181|         to Metaph. ix, text. 16 [*Ed. ~Did. viii, 8]. Hence offices
13   3, 7  |          should read 'infinity' - Ed.] of the Divine Person,
14   3, 22 |         gathered from the above.--Ed.)~[*Some editions, however,
15   3, 26 |         men.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] Ed. Note Para. 1/5~ST. THOMAS
16   3, 26 |     Redeemer~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] Ed. Note Para. 2/5~It will
17   3, 26 |         sin.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] Ed. Note Para. 3/5~Why, then,
18   3, 26 |   animation?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] Ed. Note Para. 4/5~Such a conclusion
19   3, 26 |   animation.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[27] Ed. Note Para. 5/5~The question