Part, Question

 1   1, 19 |             as appears in each of the appetites. For a natural ~agent intends
 2   1, 79 |            sensitive and intellectual appetites are distinct powers?~Aquin.:
 3   1, 79 |            sensitive and intellectual appetites are ~not distinct powers.
 4   1, 79 |            sensitive and intellectual appetites are not ~distinct powers.~
 5   1, 80 |           irascible and concupiscible appetites obey reason?~Aquin.: SMT
 6   1, 80 |           irascible and concupiscible appetites do ~not obey reason. For
 7   1, 80 |           irascible and concupiscible appetites do not obey reason.~Aquin.:
 8   1, 80 |           irascible and concupiscible appetites resist reason: according
 9   1, 80 |           irascible and concupiscible appetites do ~not obey reason.~Aquin.:
10   1, 80 |           concupiscible and irascible appetites: for instance, ~the sheep,
11   1, 80 |           irascible and concupiscible appetites: but he awaits the ~command
12   2, 26 |       according to the difference ~of appetites. For there is an appetite
13   2, 26 |              2/2~Now in each of these appetites, the name "love" is given
14   2, 28 |             concord ~denotes union of appetites among various persons, while
15   2, 28 |               union, the union of the appetites even in one man.~Aquin.:
16   2, 28 |        consent" ~denotes the union of appetites proceeding from knowledge,
17   2, 28 | connaturalness," the union of natural appetites.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[29] A[
18   2, 28 |               the result of one's own appetites being directed to one ~object;
19   2, 123|             confined to the sensitive appetites, without the accession of