Part, Question

 1   2, 17 |           Whether the act of the vegetal soul is commanded?~(9) Whether
 2   2, 17 |         1~Whether the act of the vegetal soul is commanded?~Aquin.:
 3   2, 17 |        seem that the acts of the vegetal soul are subject to ~the
 4   2, 17 |         of higher rank than ~the vegetal powers. But the powers of
 5   2, 17 |           are the powers of the ~vegetal soul.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[17]
 6   2, 17 |           even the powers of the vegetal ~soul, obey the command
 7   2, 17 |         such are the acts of the vegetal soul; wherefore Gregory
 8   2, 17 |     Consequently the acts of the vegetal ~soul are not subject to
 9   2, 17 |       fact that ~the acts of the vegetal soul do not obey reason,
10   2, 17 |           than the powers of the vegetal soul. But the ~powers of
11   2, 17 |           But the ~powers of the vegetal soul do not obey reason,
12   2, 17 |       than are the powers of the vegetal soul.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[17]
13   2, 26 |     powers, which belong ~to the vegetal soul. Therefore love is
14   2, 26 |        only in the powers of the vegetal soul, ~but in all the soul'
15   2, 57 |          the sensitive, than the vegetal. For it is ~thus that science
16   2, 80 | principle, not even those of the vegetal soul, which are the ~lowest
17   2, 80 |        with the functions of the vegetal soul, that ~food may be
18   2, 146|     belongs to the powers of the vegetal soul. In these powers virtue ~