Part, Question

 1   2, 157|          Of its comparison with savagery or brutality.~Aquin.: SMT
 2   2, 157|    Whether cruelty differs from savagery or brutality?~Aquin.: SMT
 3   2, 157|        cruelty differs not from savagery or ~brutality. For seemingly
 4   2, 157|        to one virtue. ~Now both savagery and cruelty are opposed
 5   2, 157|    Therefore it would seem that savagery and cruelty are the same.~
 6   2, 157|         severity is as it were ~savagery with verity, because it
 7   2, 157|   attending to ~piety": so that savagery would seem to exclude that
 8   2, 157|         cruelty is ~the same as savagery.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[159] A[
 9   2, 157|    opposed ~to both cruelty and savagery, namely remission or laxity.
10   2, 157|       be zeal without ~unseemly savagery, let there be piety without
11   2, 157|     undue clemency." Therefore ~savagery is the same as cruelty.~
12   2, 157|       Para. 1/1~I answer that, "Savagery" and "brutality" take their
13   2, 157| properly speaking, brutality or savagery applies to those who ~in
14   2, 157| wherefore cruelty ~differs from savagery or brutality, as human wickedness
15   2, 157|        of human wickedness. But savagery or ~brutality is comprised
16   2, 157|   Consequently we may ~say that savagery is directly opposed to the
17   2, 157|     account of some likeness to savagery which is not inclined to
18   2, 157|  opposed to cruelty, but not to savagery.~