Part, Question

 1   1, 1 |          the astronomer by means of mathematics (i.e. abstracting from ~
 2   1, 5 |        notes (Metaph. iii) that "in mathematics ~goodness does not exist."
 3   1, 5 |       goodness does not exist." But mathematics are entities; otherwise
 4   1, 5 |              would be no science of mathematics. Therefore not every being
 5   1, 7 |      infinite in ~magnitude. For in mathematics there is no error, since "
 6   1, 7 |    Philosopher says (Phys. ii). But mathematics ~uses the infinite in magnitude;
 7   1, 11|           belongs to the "genus" of mathematics, which are material in being,
 8   1, 16|           not, as, for instance, in mathematics. ~Therefore the true is
 9   1, 44| demonstrated by ~that cause. But in mathematics demonstration is not made
10   1, 44|         Reply OBJ 3: The science of mathematics treats its object as though
11   1, 44|             although the object of ~mathematics has an efficient cause,
12   1, 45| demonstrated by ~that cause. But in mathematics demonstration is not made
13   1, 45|         Reply OBJ 3: The science of mathematics treats its object as though
14   1, 45|             although the object of ~mathematics has an efficient cause,
15   1, 78|           which natural science and mathematics treat. And the "opinionative"
16   2, 35|     perspective as being species of mathematics, ~inasmuch as the principles
17   2, 35|       inasmuch as the principles of mathematics are applied to natural matter.~
18   2, 54|            proves this by means of ~mathematics, e.g. by the shapes of eclipses,