1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-3554
Part, Question
2001 2, 168 | and according to different human laws and customs.~Aquin.:
2002 2, 169 | extends to the direction of human acts, and this pertains
2003 2, 169 | 3~Now those things above human ken which are revealed by
2004 2, 169 | cannot be ~confirmed by human reason, which they surpass
2005 2, 169 | prophetic knowledge the ~human intellect is passive to
2006 2, 169 | raises man to something above human ~nature, and this may happen
2007 2, 169 | Secondly, a thing is above human ~nature as to the mode but
2008 2, 169 | knowledge, which is about human things. Now habits and acts
2009 2, 169 | all things both Divine and human, both spiritual and corporeal; ~
2010 2, 169 | contains matters relating to human conduct, according to Is. ~
2011 2, 169 | another man does not know by human sense, since ~they are removed
2012 2, 169 | on account of a defect in human knowledge; such as the mystery
2013 2, 169 | reason which is the cause of human science. Now ~a man who
2014 2, 169 | instinct to "which the human mind is subjected without
2015 2, 169 | they be ~natural causes or human acts, are so disposed as
2016 2, 170 | ad lit. xii, 13) that the human soul, according as it is
2017 2, 170 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the human soul's knowledge is more
2018 2, 170 | for the stability of the human race. Now "nature ~does
2019 2, 170 | Some have deemed the human soul ~to contain a certain
2020 2, 170 | certain ~effects, to which human experience may extend. Secondly,
2021 2, 170 | which naturally surpass human knowledge. Consequently
2022 2, 170 | which take place in the human imagination through the ~
2023 2, 170 | even to the direction of human ~acts; and in this way prophecy
2024 2, 170 | demons do not ~enlighten the human intellect, as stated above
2025 2, 170 | knowledge far removed from human knowledge. Now it is evident
2026 2, 170 | intellect. Again, above the human ~intellect there is not
2027 2, 171 | knowledge possessed by the human ~mind, namely the acceptance
2028 2, 171 | things are represented to the human mind ~under the form of
2029 2, 171 | the judgment formed by the human mind, it depends on the
2030 2, 171 | prophecy confers on the human mind something which ~surpasses
2031 2, 171 | means of ~certain species. Human teaching may be likened
2032 2, 171 | divinely imprinted on the human ~mind - sometimes for the
2033 2, 172 | more lofty: even as ~in human teaching the hearer, who
2034 2, 172 | things that can be known by ~human reason, such intellectual
2035 2, 172 | things that can be known by human reason, not in God's ~name,
2036 2, 172 | do things pertaining to human conduct. Now knowledge ~
2037 2, 172 | regards the guidance of human acts, the prophetic revelation
2038 2, 172 | but for the direction of human acts. Thus Augustine ~says (
2039 2, 173 | than the intellect. Now the human intellect does ~not turn
2040 2, 174 | elegance of style which human art adds to a ~language,
2041 2, 174 | particular knowledge, namely of human ~words; wherefore it is
2042 2, 175 | Holy Ghost makes use of the human tongue as of an instrument; ~
2043 2, 175 | the word that relies on ~human eloquence without the power
2044 2, 175 | the persuasive words of ~human wisdom, but in the showing
2045 2, 177 | applies to intellect and human ~life.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[
2046 2, 177 | than two ~occupations of human actions. Therefore it would
2047 2, 177 | division applies to ~the human life as derived from the
2048 2, 177 | All the occupations of human actions, if directed to
2049 2, 177 | under the active life. Those human occupations that are ~directed
2050 2, 178 | cannot be comprehended by the human ~reason. The sixth is "above
2051 2, 178 | things that seem contrary to human ~reason, such as the doctrine
2052 2, 178 | is a perfection of ~the human intellect. Therefore the
2053 2, 178 | is ~the end of the whole human life. Hence Augustine says (
2054 2, 178 | ultimate perfection of the human intellect is the ~divine
2055 2, 178 | the present state of life human contemplation is ~impossible
2056 2, 178 | delight thereof surpasses all human delight, both ~because spiritual
2057 2, 179 | comprising any kind ~of human knowledge, then prudence,
2058 2, 180 | active life is according to ~human things; wherefore Augustine
2059 2, 180 | specially accepts that of ~the human soul when it is offered
2060 2, 181 | it is again that even in human acts, a matter is said to
2061 2, 181 | are infinite varieties of human acts both in ~spirituals
2062 2, 181 | infinite in number. Therefore human duties cannot ~be differentiated
2063 2, 181 | The material diversity of human acts is infinite. It is
2064 2, 181 | of acts, and in this way human acts are not infinite.~Aquin.:
2065 2, 181 | justice." Now ~in every human effort we can distinguish
2066 2, 182 | Who is the last end of the human mind, since "he ~that abideth
2067 2, 182 | 1: The perfection of the human senses would seem to consist ~
2068 2, 183 | have to be considered in human acts: for the ~decision
2069 2, 183 | such matters is left to human prudence.~Aquin.: SMT SS
2070 2, 184 | Now things pertaining to human acts are ~specified and
2071 2, 184 | secondly, as quieting the human mind from outward solicitude,
2072 2, 184 | the inordinateness of the ~human will, and this is removed
2073 2, 184 | religious ~observances as regard human actions whereby a man is
2074 2, 184 | will, to which though ~all human affairs are subject, yet
2075 2, 184 | special manner, namely human actions, since passions
2076 2, 184 | of a certain weakness of human affection.~Aquin.: SMT SS
2077 2, 185 | are comprised all ~those human occupations whereby man
2078 2, 185 | the disease of pride ~and human glory." Hence Jerome praises
2079 2, 185 | that is worn ~on account of human glory.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[
2080 2, 186 | who thought that God had a human shape. Hence Gregory ~says (
2081 2, 186 | they seem to have renounced human intercourse more than is
2082 2, 186 | as it were, to bear with human fellowship on ~account of
2083 2, 187 | virgins, ~and none marry, the human race will perish. Virtue
2084 3 | considering the last end of human life, ~and the virtues and
2085 3 | benefits bestowed by Him on the human race.~Aquin.: SMT TP Prologue
2086 3, 1 | for the restoration of the human race?~(3) Whether if there
2087 3, 1 | most composite - especially human ~flesh. Therefore it was
2088 3, 1 | God should be united to human ~flesh.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2089 3, 1 | person was not fitting to ~human flesh, according to its
2090 3, 1 | that God was so joined to human flesh as ~either to desert
2091 3, 1 | for the restoration of the human race that the ~Word of God
2092 3, 1 | for the reparation of the ~human race that the Word of God
2093 3, 1 | incarnate Word of God restored human nature. He could also have
2094 3, 1 | for the restoration of human nature, which had fallen ~
2095 3, 1 | necessary for the restoration of human nature that the Word of
2096 3, 1 | contrary, What frees the human race from perdition is necessary ~
2097 3, 1 | for ~the preservation of human life. Secondly, when the
2098 3, 1 | for the ~restoration of human nature. For God with His
2099 3, 1 | power could have ~restored human nature in many other ways.
2100 3, 1 | incarnate for the restoration of human ~nature. Hence Augustine
2101 3, 1 | of God, having assumed human nature, established and
2102 3, 1 | become ~a partner with us of human nature?" Thirdly, with regard
2103 3, 1 | bliss of man and end of human life; and ~this is bestowed
2104 3, 1 | Trin. xiii, 17): ~"Since human nature is so united to God
2105 3, 1 | proved to us how high a place human nature holds ~amongst creatures,
2106 3, 1 | satisfied for the ~whole human race, and God was not bound
2107 3, 1 | both because the whole of human nature ~has been corrupted
2108 3, 1 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, human nature has not been made
2109 3, 1 | if man had not sinned, human nature would have ~been
2110 3, 1 | would God have withheld from human nature ~any good it was
2111 3, 1 | capability may be remarked in human nature: one, ~in respect
2112 3, 1 | But there is no reason why human nature should not have been ~
2113 3, 1 | Incarnation to be the remedy of human sin.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[1]
2114 3, 1 | sin, whereby ~the whole human race is infected, is greater
2115 3, 1 | in the beginning ~of the human race?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[1]
2116 3, 1 | in the beginning of the human race. For the work of the ~
2117 3, 1 | have brought ~relief to the human race from the beginning.~
2118 3, 1 | at the beginning of the human race; for in the various ~
2119 3, 1 | at the ~beginning of the human race.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[1]
2120 3, 1 | at the beginning of the human race.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[1]
2121 3, 1 | at the beginning of ~the human race.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[1]
2122 3, 1 | to the restoration of the human race by blotting out sin,
2123 3, 1 | at the beginning of ~the human race before sin. For medicine
2124 3, 1 | did not bestow upon the human race the remedy ~of the
2125 3, 1 | duration the imperfection of human nature; ~but the latter'
2126 3, 1 | the highest perfection of ~human nature is in the union with
2127 3, 1 | sufficient for the ~salvation of human nature. Therefore it was
2128 3, 1 | union of the Divine and human nature. For, as it has ~
2129 3, 1 | for by the Incarnation human nature is ~raised to its
2130 3, 1 | at the beginning of the human ~race. And the Word incarnate
2131 3, 1 | cause of the perfection of ~human nature, according to Jn.
2132 3, 1 | perfection of glory to which ~human nature is to be finally
2133 3, 1 | by the feebleness ~of the human race men's knowledge of
2134 3, 1 | referred to the mercy shown the human race ~by the Incarnation
2135 3, 1 | compared to the youth of ~the human race, "on account of the
2136 3, 1 | Master by Whose imitation the human race ~was to be formed to
2137 3, 1 | in the old age - of the ~human race.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[1]
2138 3, 1 | principle of perfection to human nature, as has been said.~
2139 3, 2 | Christ?~(6) Whether the human nature was united to the
2140 3, 2 | flesh ~together form the human nature, so God and man together
2141 3, 2 | transmuted. But the Divine and ~human natures in Christ are denominated
2142 3, 2 | i ad ~Cledon.) that the human nature is "deified," as
2143 3, 2 | infinitely ~exceeds the human nature, there could be no
2144 3, 2 | i.e. the Divine and the human, has its ~specific perfection.
2145 3, 2 | because the Divine and human natures ~cannot constitute
2146 3, 2 | would exist ~neither in human nature nor in the Divine
2147 3, 2 | that from the Divine and human natures (a union in ~subsistence
2148 3, 2 | subsists ~in the Divine and human natures.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2149 3, 2 | OBJ 2: Further, Christ's human nature has no less dignity
2150 3, 2 | ad ~2). Hence, since our human nature has its proper personality,
2151 3, 2 | God assumed an ~individual human nature, for "universal human
2152 3, 2 | human nature, for "universal human nature does not exist of ~
2153 3, 2 | iii, 11). Therefore the human nature of Christ has its
2154 3, 2 | nature or ~not. Hence, if the human nature is not united to
2155 3, 2 | inasmuch as the Word has a human nature united to Him, which ~
2156 3, 2 | subsisting. And because human ~nature is united to the
2157 3, 2 | follows ~that the union of human nature to the Word of God
2158 3, 2 | exist by oneself. Hence the human nature of Christ ~has a
2159 3, 2 | Word of God "did not assume human nature in general, ~but '
2160 3, 2 | Therefore, although this ~human nature is a kind of individual
2161 3, 2 | xxxviii): "Both the Divine and human substance are one Son of
2162 3, 2 | is ~contained under the human species unless it be a hypostasis
2163 3, 2 | it be a hypostasis of the human ~species. Therefore in Christ
2164 3, 2 | same to attribute to the human ~nature in Christ a proper
2165 3, 2 | a foot. So ~likewise the human nature in Christ, although
2166 3, 2 | say that Christ ~is in the human species by reason of the
2167 3, 2 | body in us a person or a human hypostasis ~is caused. Hence
2168 3, 2 | results the nature of ~the human species. But Damascene says (
2169 3, 2 | belongs essentially to the human ~species that the soul be
2170 3, 2 | First, ~as referring to human nature, which, as it is
2171 3, 2 | Son of God did not ~assume human nature as it exists in the
2172 3, 2 | He would not have assumed human nature in reality, ~unless
2173 3, 2 | unless it be said that human nature is a separate idea,
2174 3, 2 | that the Son of God assumed human nature as it is ~in all
2175 3, 2 | iii, 11) that He assumed human nature "in atomo," i.e.
2176 3, 2 | taken not as referring to ~human nature, as if from the union
2177 3, 2 | one common nature ~(viz. human) did not result, but as
2178 3, 2 | two ~natures Divine and human: which do not combine so
2179 3, 2 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the human nature was united to the
2180 3, 2 | It would seem that the human nature was united to the
2181 3, 2 | species of quality. Therefore human nature is ~accidentally
2182 3, 2 | subject being corrupted. But human nature came to Christ ~in
2183 3, 2 | substance or an ~accident. But human nature does not pertain
2184 3, 2 | above (A[1]). Hence the human nature must have accrued ~
2185 3, 2 | accrues accidentally. But the human nature ~was the instrument
2186 3, 2 | Therefore it seems that the human nature was united to the
2187 3, 2 | being. If ~therefore the human nature accrues accidentally,
2188 3, 2 | Incarnation. Hence the human nature in Christ is likened
2189 3, 2 | the ~Word is seen by the human nature, as a man by his
2190 3, 2 | garment. So likewise the human nature assumed by the Word ~
2191 3, 2 | person; while in time the human nature accrued to ~it, not
2192 3, 2 | hypostasis or person. Hence the human ~nature is not accidentally
2193 3, 2 | Nestorius held that the human nature was assumed by the ~
2194 3, 2 | Damascene held that the human nature in Christ is an instrument ~
2195 3, 2 | the Divine nature and the human is anything created?~Aquin.:
2196 3, 2 | union of the Divine and human natures is ~not anything
2197 3, 2 | God Himself is ~united to human nature. Therefore it seems
2198 3, 2 | between the Divine and the human nature, inasmuch as they
2199 3, 2 | of thinking; but in the human nature, which is a ~creature,
2200 3, 2 | the Divine Nature and the human, according as they come ~
2201 3, 2 | to be assumed. For the ~human nature is taken to be in
2202 3, 2 | Son ~of God, Who assumes human nature unto Himself, is
2203 3, 2 | unto Himself, is man. But human nature, ~considered in itself,
2204 3, 2 | not say the Son of God is human nature. From this same follows
2205 3, 2 | indifferently that the human nature is united with the
2206 3, 2 | said to be assumed by the ~human, but conversely, because
2207 3, 2 | conversely, because the human nature is joined to the
2208 3, 2 | Divine Person subsists in human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2209 3, 2 | of ~the Father united the human nature to the Son, but not
2210 3, 2 | assumed, which is ~flesh or human nature. And thus assumption
2211 3, 2 | namely, the Divine and human natures; for they are infinitely ~
2212 3, 2 | union of the Divine and human nature there results what
2213 3, 2 | that ~of the Divine and human natures; and hence the union
2214 3, 2 | and not by reason of the human nature, ~which is not the
2215 3, 2 | authority of Augustine that the human nature is not more in the
2216 3, 2 | But the union of the human nature to the Divine did
2217 3, 2 | the free gift of God. Now human nature stands in need of
2218 3, 2 | natural capability. Moreover, human nature is lifted up to God ~
2219 3, 2 | exclusively to Christ, ~in Whom human nature is assumed so as
2220 3, 2 | then the fact that the human nature is ~united to the
2221 3, 2 | But by the Incarnation human nature is not ~said to have
2222 3, 2 | Person belongs to the ~whole human nature, which is composed
2223 3, 2 | reformation ~of the entire human nature, and therefore it
2224 3, 2 | to Him ~according to the human nature, otherwise it would
2225 3, 2 | In the assumption of ~human nature, grace itself became
2226 3, 2 | by the principles of the human nature of ~Christ, although
2227 3, 2 | natural, as if coming to the human ~nature of Christ by the
2228 3, 2 | beginning of His conception the human ~nature was united to the
2229 3, 2 | Christ according to ~His human nature, as if it were caused
2230 3, 2 | by the principles of the human ~nature, and hence it need
2231 3, 2 | to Him in regard to the human nature on account of the "
2232 3, 3 | the Son of God to ~assume human nature than for another
2233 3, 3 | above (Q[2], A[1]), the human nature ~constitutes a Divine
2234 3, 3 | from such a nature. For human nature does not make the
2235 3, 3 | Nature, but to assume ~the human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2236 3, 3 | Nature did not take to Itself human nature, for ~the union did
2237 3, 3 | Divine Nature to assume human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2238 3, 3 | thus the Father ~assumed human nature even as the Son,
2239 3, 3 | as the Divine Nature took human nature to the ~Person of
2240 3, 3 | although the ~Father takes human nature to the Person of
2241 3, 3 | that the Father assumes human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2242 3, 3 | be ~understood to assume human nature by reason of Its
2243 3, 3 | OBJ 3: Further, as the human nature in Christ is assumed
2244 3, 3 | three ~Persons caused the human nature to be united to the
2245 3, 3 | Persons could have assumed human nature?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2246 3, 3 | Person could have assumed ~human nature except the Person
2247 3, 3 | power ~could have united human nature to the Person of
2248 3, 3 | make several gods, so one human nature in ~several persons
2249 3, 3 | three Persons can take one human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2250 3, 3 | Persons cannot assume one human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2251 3, 3 | Persons were to assume one human ~nature, it would follow
2252 3, 3 | Persons should assume one human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2253 3, 3 | can also ~subsist in one human nature in such a way that
2254 3, 3 | nature in such a way that the human nature be ~assumed by the
2255 3, 3 | new ~hypostasis, but one human nature is assumed to the
2256 3, 3 | place by the power of the human ~nature, but by the power
2257 3, 3 | according to the quality of the human nature ~assumed. Therefore
2258 3, 3 | Persons ~should assume one human nature, but it would be
2259 3, 3 | for them to ~assume one human hypostasis or person; thus
2260 3, 3 | three Persons assume one human ~nature, it would be true
2261 3, 3 | man, ~because of the one human nature. For just as it is
2262 3, 3 | man on account of the one human nature. ~Nor would "one"
2263 3, 3 | of person, but unity in human nature; for it ~could not
2264 3, 3 | In this supposition the human nature would be assumed
2265 3, 3 | each Person, so ~also the human nature would have a unity
2266 3, 3 | predicated what belongs to ~the human nature and what belongs
2267 3, 3 | Divine Person can assume two human natures?~Aquin.: SMT TP
2268 3, 3 | Person cannot assume two human ~natures. For the nature
2269 3, 3 | one Person to assume two human natures, there would be
2270 3, 3 | that He would not have one human ~nature; neither could it
2271 3, 3 | Fide Orth. iii, 7). But two human natures ~cannot be wholly
2272 3, 3 | Divine Person to assume two human natures.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2273 3, 3 | Father can still assume a human nature ~distinct from that
2274 3, 3 | Son can assume another ~human nature distinct from the
2275 3, 3 | Divine ~Person so assumed one human nature as to be unable to
2276 3, 3 | was so comprehended by one human nature as to be unable to
2277 3, 3 | Person, over and ~beyond the human nature which He has assumed,
2278 3, 3 | assume another distinct ~human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2279 3, 3 | Person were to ~assume two human natures, He would be called,
2280 3, 3 | suppositum, one man having two human natures. Now many men are
2281 3, 3 | were to assume one singular human nature, they would be said
2282 3, 3 | Reply OBJ 3: The Divine and human natures do not bear the
2283 3, 3 | eternity; and afterwards the ~human nature is related to the
2284 3, 3 | Person of God subsists in human nature. For the Son of God ~
2285 3, 3 | hence, in order that the ~human nature may be assumed by
2286 3, 3 | Divine Person should assume human nature?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2287 3, 3 | was said of the Son in His human nature, as Arius, who held
2288 3, 3 | were, a second creation of human nature, according to Gal.
2289 3, 3 | particular agreement with human nature, since the Word ~
2290 3, 3 | be personally united to human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2291 3, 3 | There is nothing which human malice cannot abuse, since
2292 3, 3 | were not able to restore human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2293 3, 4 | UNION ON THE PART OF THE HUMAN NATURE (SIX ARTICLES)~We
2294 3, 4 | Now the Son of God assumed human nature and its parts. Hence
2295 3, 4 | of inquiry:~(1) Whether human nature was more capable
2296 3, 4 | becoming that He should assume human nature ~abstracted from
2297 3, 4 | becoming that He should assume human nature in all ~its individuals?~(
2298 3, 4 | becoming that He should assume human nature in any ~man begotten
2299 3, 4 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether human nature was more assumable
2300 3, 4 | OBJ 1: It would seem that human nature is not more capable
2301 3, 4 | God is infinite. Therefore human nature is not ~more capable
2302 3, 4 | capable of assumption as human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2303 3, 4 | perfect likeness ~than in human nature, as Gregory says: (
2304 3, 4 | parts, amongst which is human nature. Therefore the ~whole
2305 3, 4 | capable of being assumed than human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2306 3, 4 | union of the Son of God with human ~nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2307 3, 4 | union. Now this fitness in human ~nature may be taken from
2308 3, 4 | to its dignity, because human nature, as ~being rational
2309 3, 4 | these two things belong to human nature alone. ~For in the
2310 3, 4 | Hence it ~follows that only human nature was assumable.~Aquin.:
2311 3, 4 | likeness of image is found in human nature, forasmuch ~as it
2312 3, 4 | Hence it follows that only human nature is capable of being
2313 3, 4 | the Son of God "assumed human nature ~'in atomo,'" i.e.
2314 3, 4 | motion. Now a ~person in human nature is not presupposed
2315 3, 4 | of God nowise assumed a ~human person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2316 3, 4 | The Son of God assumed human nature "in atomo," i.e.
2317 3, 4 | to the perfection of the human ~nature but through the
2318 3, 4 | something which is above human nature, ~viz. the union
2319 3, 4 | otherwise have been. For if ~the human nature had not been assumed
2320 3, 4 | by a Divine Person, the human ~nature would have had its
2321 3, 4 | by His union hindered the human nature from having its ~
2322 3, 4 | and in him bore things human."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[
2323 3, 4 | the word "man" signifies a human nature. But the Son of ~
2324 3, 4 | the Son of ~God assumed a human nature. Therefore He assumed
2325 3, 4 | the individual to Whom the human nature is ~assumed is none
2326 3, 4 | this word "man" signifies human nature, as it is in a ~suppositum,
2327 3, 4 | God signifies Him Who has human nature. And hence it cannot
2328 3, 4 | The word "man" signifies human nature in the concrete, ~
2329 3, 4 | God ought to have assumed human nature abstracted from ~
2330 3, 4 | God ought to have assumed human ~nature abstracted from
2331 3, 4 | individuals. For the assumption of human ~nature took place for the
2332 3, 4 | God ought to have assumed human nature ~as it is abstracted
2333 3, 4 | according to ~Platonists, is human nature abstracted from its
2334 3, 4 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, human nature was not assumed by
2335 3, 4 | in this way it signifies human nature as it is in individuals,
2336 3, 4 | the Son of God assumed ~human nature as it is separated
2337 3, 4 | fictitious Incarnation." ~But human nature as it is separated
2338 3, 4 | Son of God did not ~assume human nature, as it is separated
2339 3, 4 | existing in an intellect either human or Divine. Now it ~cannot
2340 3, 4 | definition of man. Hence human nature cannot be without
2341 3, 4 | matter. Nevertheless, if human nature were subsistent in
2342 3, 4 | the Son ~of God assumed human nature in order to show
2343 3, 4 | Likewise, neither could human nature have been assumed
2344 3, 4 | and, according to this, human nature would be in the ~
2345 3, 4 | the Son of God assumed ~human nature as it is in a human
2346 3, 4 | human nature as it is in a human intellect, for this would
2347 3, 4 | is understood to assume a human nature; and thus if He ~
2348 3, 4 | would this assumption of the human nature be anything but a
2349 3, 4 | is the universal cause of human salvation.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2350 3, 4 | 1~Reply OBJ 3: Although human nature was not assumed in
2351 3, 4 | God ought to have assumed human nature in all ~individuals?~
2352 3, 4 | God ought to have assumed human ~nature in all individuals.
2353 3, 4 | first and by itself is ~human nature. But what belongs
2354 3, 4 | Therefore it was fitting that human nature should be ~assumed
2355 3, 4 | of God to assume several ~human natures, as was said above (
2356 3, 4 | the Son of God to assume human nature in all its ~supposita.~
2357 3, 4 | Heb. 2:10). Therefore ~human nature ought to have been
2358 3, 4 | of ~God "did not assume human nature as a species, nor
2359 3, 4 | that, It was unfitting for human nature to be assumed by
2360 3, 4 | multitude of supposita of ~human nature, which are natural
2361 3, 4 | A[3]), if there was no human ~nature except what was
2362 3, 4 | was but one ~suppositum of human nature, which is the Person
2363 3, 4 | brethren, according to the ~human nature, even as He is the
2364 3, 4 | so He should ~assume one human nature, so that on both
2365 3, 4 | be assumed belongs to the human nature of itself, ~because
2366 3, 4 | merely in the ~assumption of human nature, but especially in
2367 3, 4 | especially in what He suffered in human ~nature for other men, according
2368 3, 4 | taken place had He assumed human nature in ~all its supposita.~
2369 3, 4 | the Son of God to assume human nature of the ~stock of
2370 3, 4 | the Son of God to ~assume human nature of the stock of Adam,
2371 3, 4 | sinners had He not assumed human nature of the stock of Adam,
2372 3, 4 | ought not to have assumed human nature of ~the stock of
2373 3, 4 | if He wished to assume human nature, He ought to ~have
2374 3, 4 | if He wished to assume human nature from ~sinners, He
2375 3, 4 | God was able to ~assume human nature elsewhere than from
2376 3, 4 | had fettered the whole human race; yet God judged it
2377 3, 4 | judged it better to assume ~human nature from the vanquished
2378 3, 4 | vanquish the enemy of ~the human race." And this for three
2379 3, 4 | fitting that He should assume human nature in Adam himself.~
2380 3, 5 | Para. 1/1 - OF THE PARTS OF HUMAN NATURE WHICH WERE ASSUMED (
2381 3, 5 | assumption of the parts of human nature; and ~under this
2382 3, 5 | First, from the essence of human ~nature to which it pertains
2383 3, 5 | the Son of God to ~assume human nature, He must consequently
2384 3, 5 | indicates the truth of the human nature in ~Christ - just
2385 3, 5 | all that truly exist in human nature are said to be like ~
2386 3, 5 | even as the truth of the human nature of Christ ~would
2387 3, 5 | He was not ~conceived of human seed." And Hilary expounds
2388 3, 5 | common ~nature, which is the human species. But "in the Lord
2389 3, 5 | such as say that only a human body was assumed by the
2390 3, 5 | from a soul and body one human ~nature is constituted.
2391 3, 5 | shows that He had a true human body: otherwise, if ~these
2392 3, 5 | the Son of God assumed a human mind or intellect?~Aquin.:
2393 3, 5 | of God did not assume a human mind or ~intellect. For
2394 3, 5 | there was no need of a human mind.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[5]
2395 3, 5 | there is ~no need of a human mind.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[5]
2396 3, 5 | Further, the assumption of human nature by the Word of God
2397 3, 5 | Incarnation. But the intellect or human mind is nothing ~carnal,
2398 3, 5 | of ~God did not assume a human mind.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[5]
2399 3, 5 | of man from sin. For the human soul is not capable of sin ~
2400 3, 5 | proper form, ~it is not truly human flesh if it is not perfected
2401 3, 5 | if it is not perfected by human, i.e. a ~rational soul.
2402 3, 5 | would not have had true human flesh, but irrational flesh,
2403 3, 5 | animal with the form of a human body," which, again, is ~
2404 3, 5 | in order to perfect the human mind it was necessary that ~
2405 3, 5 | nevertheless the essence of the human soul, which is the form
2406 3, 6 | soul?~(5) Whether the whole human nature was assumed through
2407 3, 6 | Son of God is united to ~human nature and its parts, is
2408 3, 6 | pertains immediately to the ~human hypostasis or person, even
2409 3, 6 | as the soul. Indeed, the human body, ~since it is matter,
2410 3, 6 | soul, and ~through it a human body, so as to raise the
2411 3, 6 | of God united the whole human nature to Himself at the
2412 3, 6 | through which it becomes human flesh. ~For it was said
2413 3, 6 | above (Q[4], A[1]) that human nature was assumable before ~
2414 3, 6 | pertains ~the assumption of human nature by the Word of God,
2415 3, 6 | were constituted ~simply by human nature, it would follow
2416 3, 6 | form, would be nearer the human nature. But ~because the
2417 3, 6 | and more exalted than the ~human nature, the more exalted
2418 3, 6 | exalted any part of the human nature is, the ~nearer it
2419 3, 6 | which cannot be said of the human spirit, as is clear from ~
2420 3, 6 | as the soul is a part of human nature, so is the body. ~
2421 3, 6 | so is the body. ~But the human soul in Christ had no other
2422 3, 6 | 1/1 ~I answer that, The human flesh is assumable by the
2423 3, 6 | been assumed before it was human flesh; and this happened
2424 3, 6 | the soul, since it is not human flesh before it has a ~rational
2425 3, 6 | 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Human flesh depends upon the soul
2426 3, 6 | of the soul, there is no human flesh, but there may be ~
2427 3, 6 | be ~a disposition towards human flesh. Yet in the conception
2428 3, 6 | Para. 1/1~Whether the whole human nature was assumed through
2429 3, 6 | of God assumed the whole human nature ~through the medium
2430 3, 6 | body. But the parts of ~human nature, since they are simpler
2431 3, 6 | order ~to constitute the human nature of the Word. But
2432 3, 6 | God assumed the parts ~of human nature, through the medium
2433 3, 6 | account of their relation to human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2434 3, 6 | by assuming the parts of human nature, assumed the whole
2435 3, 6 | nature, assumed the whole human ~nature. And thus the assumption
2436 3, 6 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the human nature was assumed through
2437 3, 6 | that the Son of God assumed human nature through ~the medium
2438 3, 6 | are united to God. But the human ~nature in Christ was most
2439 3, 6 | the soul by grace. But the human nature was fitted for the ~
2440 3, 6 | the union of the Word with human nature took ~place in the
2441 3, 6 | A[6]). Therefore the human nature was not assumed by
2442 3, 6 | of the assumption ~of the human nature, whether we speak
2443 3, 6 | gratis from above to the human nature in the Person of
2444 3, 6 | habit. Now the union of the human ~nature with the Word of
2445 3, 7 | co-assumed by the Son of God in ~human nature; and first what belongs
2446 3, 7 | things well. Therefore His human nature needed no further
2447 3, 7 | principal agent. Now ~the human nature in Christ was "as
2448 3, 7 | which it is ~necessary for human nature to be raised by grace.
2449 3, 7 | relation of Christ to the human race. For Christ, as man,
2450 3, 7 | is necessary to ~admit a human operation, distinct from
2451 3, 7 | Ghost never ~quitted the human nature of Christ, from Whose
2452 3, 7 | it pertains to Him in His human nature to have grace.~Aquin.:
2453 3, 7 | the salvation of the whole human race; for ~He is the propitiation
2454 3, 7 | been bestowed gratis on the human nature; and it ~is clear
2455 3, 7 | principle for bestowing grace on human nature, according to ~Eph.
2456 3, 7 | gift which ~is given the human nature, to be united to
2457 3, 7 | thus full and perfect to ~human nature." Thirdly, it may
2458 3, 7 | to be a disposition in ~human nature for the personal
2459 3, 7 | that the ~assumption of human nature to the unity of the
2460 3, 7 | answer that, The union of the human nature with the Divine Person, ~
2461 3, 7 | Person of the Son assuming human nature, Who is said to ~
2462 3, 7 | inasmuch as He assumed human nature; but the ~principle
2463 3, 7 | Christ is by the union of human ~nature with the Divine
2464 3, 7 | hypostasis did not ~exist in the human nature before the union,
2465 3, 7 | already existing fire. Now the human ~nature in Christ is united
2466 3, 8 | from a likeness with the human head, in ~which we may consider
2467 3, 8 | another head because one human body is not part of ~another;
2468 3, 8 | 1/1~I answer that, The human body has a natural relation
2469 3, 8 | a rational soul, ~as the human body has. Hence there is
2470 3, 8 | the salvation of the whole human race; secondly, in ~free-will.~
2471 3, 8 | vouchsafed us by means of human ~nature, but solely by the
2472 3, 9 | Further, the union of the human nature with the Divine took
2473 3, 9 | assumed the ~perfection of human nature in the flesh; He
2474 3, 9 | of God assumed an entire ~human nature, i.e. not only a
2475 3, 9 | imperfect, but a ~perfect human nature, since the whole
2476 3, 9 | nature, since the whole human race was to be brought back ~
2477 3, 9 | pertains to the nature of the ~human soul, viz. that whereby
2478 3, 9 | for any cognition of the human intellect. ~Now nothing
2479 3, 9 | since He took the whole human ~nature, as stated above (
2480 3, 9 | could not belong to the human soul of Christ, ~seeing
2481 3, 9 | His Divine and as to His human nature; so ~that, by reason
2482 3, 9 | Christ, which is a part ~of human nature, through a light
2483 3, 9 | that there should be in the human nature of ~Christ a created
2484 3, 9 | established in the last ~end of human nature.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2485 3, 9 | above the nature of the human soul.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[9]
2486 3, 9 | it was fitting that the human ~nature assumed by the Word
2487 3, 9 | species proportioned to the human mind.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[9]
2488 3, 9 | nature was wanting to the human nature assumed by the Word
2489 3, 9 | manifest that God planted in human nature not only a passive,
2490 3, 9 | properly knowledge in a human fashion, both as regards
2491 3, 9 | which is natural to the human ~soul. But infused knowledge
2492 3, 9 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The human mind has two relations -
2493 3, 9 | which naturally ~move the human mind by virtue of the active
2494 3, 9 | was insufficient for the human ~mind in itself, but that
2495 3, 9 | acquired by the relation of the human mind ~to phantasms; hence,
2496 3, 10 | Person is united to the human nature in Christ." ~Therefore
2497 3, 10 | personal being does the human ~nature comprehend the Word
2498 3, 10 | was wholly united to the human nature in the one Person
2499 3, 10 | not circumscribed by the human nature. ~Hence Augustine
2500 3, 10 | Nature, but also ~in the human, because, as Chrysostom
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3500 | 3501-3554 |