Part, Question

16501   1, 84  |                85] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Not only is
16502   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Parts can
16503   1, 84  |                85] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Parts can be
16504   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: If the intellect
16505   1, 84  |                85] A[4] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: If the intellect
16506   1, 84  |              FP Q[85] A[5] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect
16507   1, 84  |               Q[85] A[5] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect understands
16508   1, 84  |                 SMT FP Q[85] A[5] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16509   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[5] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16510   1, 84  |                85] A[5] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16511   1, 84  |                5] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that our
16512   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[5] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, every
16513   1, 84  |                85] A[5] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, every composition
16514   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[5] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the intellect
16515   1, 84  |                85] A[5] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the intellect
16516   1, 84  |                FP Q[85] A[5] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Words
16517   1, 84  |              FP Q[85] A[5] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Words signify
16518   1, 84  |               FP Q[85] A[5] Body Para. 1/2~I answer that, The human
16519   1, 84  |                 SMT FP Q[85] A[5] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Composition
16520   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[5] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Composition
16521   1, 84  |                85] A[5] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Composition
16522   1, 84  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Composition and division
16523   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[5] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Although
16524   1, 84  |                85] A[5] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Although the
16525   1, 84  |         phantasms, as we have ~said (A[1]; Q[84], A[7]). And forasmuch
16526   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[5] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The likeness
16527   1, 84  |                85] A[5] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The likeness
16528   1, 84  |              FP Q[85] A[6] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the intellect
16529   1, 84  |               Q[85] A[6] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the intellect can
16530   1, 84  |                 SMT FP Q[85] A[6] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16531   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[6] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16532   1, 84  |                85] A[6] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16533   1, 84  |                6] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16534   1, 84  |              is shown above ~(Q[79], A[1]). Therefore falsehood may
16535   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[6] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, opinion
16536   1, 84  |                85] A[6] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, opinion
16537   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[6] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, sin is
16538   1, 84  |                85] A[6] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, sin is in
16539   1, 84  |                FP Q[85] A[6] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Augustine
16540   1, 84  |              FP Q[85] A[6] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Augustine
16541   1, 84  |               FP Q[85] A[6] Body Para. 1/2~I answer that, The Philosopher (
16542   1, 84  |                 SMT FP Q[85] A[6] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The
16543   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[6] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Philosopher
16544   1, 84  |                85] A[6] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Philosopher
16545   1, 84  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Philosopher says that
16546   1, 84  |              FP Q[85] A[7] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether one person can
16547   1, 84  |               Q[85] A[7] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether one person can understand
16548   1, 84  |                 SMT FP Q[85] A[7] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16549   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[7] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16550   1, 84  |                85] A[7] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16551   1, 84  |                7] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that one
16552   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[7] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the intellect
16553   1, 84  |                85] A[7] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the intellect
16554   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[7] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the intellect
16555   1, 84  |                85] A[7] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the intellect
16556   1, 84  |                FP Q[85] A[7] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Experience
16557   1, 84  |              FP Q[85] A[7] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Experience
16558   1, 84  |               FP Q[85] A[7] Body Para. 1/2~I answer that, A thing
16559   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[7] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The difference
16560   1, 84  |                85] A[7] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The difference
16561   1, 84  |              FP Q[85] A[8] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the intellect
16562   1, 84  |               Q[85] A[8] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the intellect understands
16563   1, 84  |                 SMT FP Q[85] A[8] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16564   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[8] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16565   1, 84  |                85] A[8] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16566   1, 84  |                8] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16567   1, 84  |             Philosopher says (Phys. i, 1) that "we ~understand and
16568   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[8] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the definition
16569   1, 84  |                85] A[8] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the definition
16570   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[8] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, "Like
16571   1, 84  |                85] A[8] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, "Like is
16572   1, 84  |                FP Q[85] A[8] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is
16573   1, 84  |              FP Q[85] A[8] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is said (
16574   1, 84  |               FP Q[85] A[8] Body Para. 1/2 ~I answer that, The object
16575   1, 84  |                in Metaph. x, Did. ~ix, 1. And the reason of this
16576   1, 84  |                 SMT FP Q[85] A[8] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: In
16577   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[8] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: In the acquisition
16578   1, 84  |                85] A[8] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: In the acquisition
16579   1, 84  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: In the acquisition of knowledge,
16580   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[8] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: A point is
16581   1, 84  |                85] A[8] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: A point is
16582   1, 84  |                Q[85] A[8] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The likeness
16583   1, 84  |                85] A[8] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The likeness
16584   1, 85  |                SMT FP Q[86] Out. Para. 1/1 - WHAT OUR INTELLECT KNOWS
16585   1, 85  |              SMT FP Q[86] Out. Para. 1/1 - WHAT OUR INTELLECT KNOWS
16586   1, 85  |               four points of inquiry:~(1) Whether it knows singulars?~(
16587   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
16588   1, 85  |              FP Q[86] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect
16589   1, 85  |               Q[86] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect knows
16590   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
16591   1, 85  |                 SMT FP Q[86] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16592   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16593   1, 85  |                86] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16594   1, 85  |                1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that our
16595   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
16596   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the practical
16597   1, 85  |                86] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the practical
16598   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1 ~OBJ 3:
16599   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1 ~OBJ 3: Further, our intellect
16600   1, 85  |                86] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1 ~OBJ 3: Further, our intellect
16601   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1 ~OBJ 4:
16602   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1 ~OBJ 4: Further, a superior
16603   1, 85  |                86] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1 ~OBJ 4: Further, a superior
16604   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
16605   1, 85  |                FP Q[86] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, The Philosopher
16606   1, 85  |              FP Q[86] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, The Philosopher
16607   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] Body Para. 1/1~I answer
16608   1, 85  |               FP Q[86] A[1] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, Our intellect
16609   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[1] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, Our intellect
16610   1, 85  |              have said above (Q[85], A[1]), understands by abstracting ~
16611   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
16612   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The choice
16613   1, 85  |                86] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The choice
16614   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
16615   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Intelligibility
16616   1, 85  |                86] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Intelligibility
16617   1, 85  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[86] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply
16618   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The higher
16619   1, 85  |                86] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: The higher
16620   1, 85  |              FP Q[86] A[2] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect
16621   1, 85  |               Q[86] A[2] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect can
16622   1, 85  |                 SMT FP Q[86] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16623   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16624   1, 85  |                86] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16625   1, 85  |                2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that our
16626   1, 85  |             have ~said above (Q[12], A[1]). Much more, therefore,
16627   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[2] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, our intellect
16628   1, 85  |                86] A[2] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, our intellect
16629   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[2] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if one
16630   1, 85  |                86] A[2] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if one body
16631   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, as the
16632   1, 85  |                86] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, as the intellect
16633   1, 85  |                we have ~said (Q[76], A[1]), it appears to be an infinite
16634   1, 85  |                FP Q[86] A[2] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is
16635   1, 85  |              FP Q[86] A[2] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is said (
16636   1, 85  |               FP Q[86] A[2] Body Para. 1/3~I answer that, Since a
16637   1, 85  |       knowledge, as is said Ethic. ii, 1. Wherefore ~it would not
16638   1, 85  |                 SMT FP Q[86] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: As
16639   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: As we have
16640   1, 85  |                86] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: As we have
16641   1, 85  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: As we have said above (
16642   1, 85  |               have said above (Q[7], A[1]), God is called infinite, ~
16643   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[2] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The nature
16644   1, 85  |                86] A[2] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The nature
16645   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[2] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: If two or
16646   1, 85  |                86] A[2] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: If two or more
16647   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: As our intellect
16648   1, 85  |                86] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: As our intellect
16649   1, 85  |              FP Q[86] A[3] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect
16650   1, 85  |               Q[86] A[3] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect can
16651   1, 85  |                 SMT FP Q[86] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16652   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16653   1, 85  |                86] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16654   1, 85  |                3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16655   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[3] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, as stated
16656   1, 85  |                86] A[3] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, as stated
16657   1, 85  |                FP Q[86] A[3] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, All knowledge
16658   1, 85  |              FP Q[86] A[3] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, All knowledge
16659   1, 85  |               FP Q[86] A[3] Body Para. 1/2~I answer that, Contingent
16660   1, 85  |              it was laid down above (A[1]) that the intellect of ~
16661   1, 85  |               as we have said above (A[1]). Therefore the contingent, ~
16662   1, 85  |              FP Q[86] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect
16663   1, 85  |               Q[86] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect can
16664   1, 85  |                 SMT FP Q[86] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16665   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16666   1, 85  |                86] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16667   1, 85  |                4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that our
16668   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, man, while
16669   1, 85  |                86] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, man, while
16670   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: The intellectual
16671   1, 85  |                86] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: The intellectual
16672   1, 85  |                FP Q[86] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is
16673   1, 85  |              FP Q[86] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is written (
16674   1, 85  |               FP Q[86] A[4] Body Para. 1/2~I answer that, We must
16675   1, 85  |               only, as stated above (A[1]). But the principles of ~
16676   1, 85  |                 SMT FP Q[86] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This
16677   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This argument
16678   1, 85  |                86] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This argument
16679   1, 85  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This argument considers
16680   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 2: As Augustine
16681   1, 85  |                Q[86] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Brute animals
16682   1, 85  |                86] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Brute animals
16683   1, 86  |                SMT FP Q[87] Out. Para. 1/1 - HOW THE INTELLECTUAL
16684   1, 86  |              SMT FP Q[87] Out. Para. 1/1 - HOW THE INTELLECTUAL SOUL
16685   1, 86  |               four points of inquiry:~(1) Whether the soul knows
16686   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
16687   1, 86  |              FP Q[87] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the intellectual
16688   1, 86  |               Q[87] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the intellectual
16689   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
16690   1, 86  |                 SMT FP Q[87] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16691   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16692   1, 86  |                87] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16693   1, 86  |                1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16694   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
16695   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, both angels
16696   1, 86  |                87] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, both angels
16697   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
16698   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, "in things
16699   1, 86  |                87] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, "in things
16700   1, 86  |              as stated above (Q[76], A[1]). ~Therefore the intellect
16701   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
16702   1, 86  |                FP Q[87] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is
16703   1, 86  |              FP Q[87] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is said (
16704   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] Body Para. 1/2~I answer
16705   1, 86  |               FP Q[87] A[1] Body Para. 1/2~I answer that, Everything
16706   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] Body Para. 2/2~Therefore
16707   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
16708   1, 86  |                 SMT FP Q[87] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The
16709   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The mind
16710   1, 86  |                87] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The mind knows
16711   1, 86  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The mind knows itself by
16712   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
16713   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The essence
16714   1, 86  |                87] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The essence
16715   1, 86  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
16716   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This saying
16717   1, 86  |                87] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This saying
16718   1, 86  |              FP Q[87] A[2] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect
16719   1, 86  |               Q[87] A[2] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect knows
16720   1, 86  |                 SMT FP Q[87] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16721   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16722   1, 86  |                87] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16723   1, 86  |                2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that our
16724   1, 86  |         Augustine says (De Trin. xiii, 1): "Faith is not seen ~in
16725   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[2] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, material
16726   1, 86  |                87] A[2] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, material
16727   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[2] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, "whatever
16728   1, 86  |                87] A[2] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, "whatever
16729   1, 86  |                FP Q[87] A[2] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Habits
16730   1, 86  |              FP Q[87] A[2] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Habits
16731   1, 86  |               FP Q[87] A[2] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, A habit
16732   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[2] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, A habit is
16733   1, 86  |               Now, it has been said (A[1]) that nothing is known
16734   1, 86  |        explained ~above of the mind (A[1]).~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[87]
16735   1, 86  |                 SMT FP Q[87] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Although
16736   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Although
16737   1, 86  |                87] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Although faith
16738   1, 86  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Although faith is not known
16739   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[2] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Habits are
16740   1, 86  |                87] A[2] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Habits are
16741   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[2] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The axiom, "
16742   1, 86  |                87] A[2] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The axiom, "
16743   1, 86  |              FP Q[87] A[3] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect
16744   1, 86  |               Q[87] A[3] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect knows
16745   1, 86  |                 SMT FP Q[87] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16746   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16747   1, 86  |                87] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16748   1, 86  |                3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that our
16749   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[3] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, whatever
16750   1, 86  |                87] A[3] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, whatever
16751   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[3] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the intellect
16752   1, 86  |                87] A[3] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the intellect
16753   1, 86  |                FP Q[87] A[3] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Augustine
16754   1, 86  |              FP Q[87] A[3] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Augustine
16755   1, 86  |               FP Q[87] A[3] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, As stated
16756   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[3] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, As stated
16757   1, 86  |              that, As stated above (AA[1],2) a thing is intelligible ~
16758   1, 86  |             have said above ~(Q[79], A[1]), and yet the first object
16759   1, 86  |                 SMT FP Q[87] A[3] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The
16760   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[3] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The object
16761   1, 86  |                87] A[3] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The object
16762   1, 86  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The object of the intellect
16763   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[3] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The intelligent
16764   1, 86  |                87] A[3] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The intelligent
16765   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[3] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The proper
16766   1, 86  |                87] A[3] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The proper
16767   1, 86  |              FP Q[87] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the intellect
16768   1, 86  |               Q[87] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the intellect understands
16769   1, 86  |                 SMT FP Q[87] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16770   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16771   1, 86  |                87] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16772   1, 86  |                4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16773   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the act
16774   1, 86  |                87] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the act
16775   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Augustine (Confess.
16776   1, 86  |                87] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Augustine (Confess.
16777   1, 86  |                FP Q[87] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Augustine
16778   1, 86  |              FP Q[87] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Augustine
16779   1, 86  |               FP Q[87] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, As stated
16780   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, As stated
16781   1, 86  |              As stated above (Q[59], A[1]), the act of the will is ~
16782   1, 86  |                 SMT FP Q[87] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This
16783   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This argument
16784   1, 86  |                87] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This argument
16785   1, 86  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This argument would hold
16786   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The "good"
16787   1, 86  |                87] A[4] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The "good"
16788   1, 86  |            said above (Q[82], A[4], ad 1; Q[16], A[4], ad 1); for ~
16789   1, 86  |                  ad 1; Q[16], A[4], ad 1); for ~the true is good
16790   1, 86  |                Q[87] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The affections
16791   1, 86  |                87] A[4] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The affections
16792   1, 87  |                SMT FP Q[88] Out. Para. 1/1 - HOW THE HUMAN SOUL KNOWS
16793   1, 87  |              SMT FP Q[88] Out. Para. 1/1 - HOW THE HUMAN SOUL KNOWS
16794   1, 87  |              three points of inquiry:~(1) Whether the human soul
16795   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
16796   1, 87  |              FP Q[88] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the human soul
16797   1, 87  |               Q[88] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the human soul in
16798   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
16799   1, 87  |                 SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16800   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16801   1, 87  |                88] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16802   1, 87  |                1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16803   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
16804   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, like is
16805   1, 87  |                88] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, like is
16806   1, 87  |              have said above (Q[76], A[1]). Since ~then our mind
16807   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
16808   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the fact
16809   1, 87  |                88] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the fact
16810   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4:
16811   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the Commentator
16812   1, 87  |                88] A[1] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the Commentator
16813   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Obj. 5 Para. 1/1~OBJ 5:
16814   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] Obj. 5 Para. 1/1~OBJ 5: Further, as sense
16815   1, 87  |                88] A[1] Obj. 5 Para. 1/1~OBJ 5: Further, as sense
16816   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
16817   1, 87  |                FP Q[88] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is
16818   1, 87  |              FP Q[88] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, It is written (
16819   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Body Para. 1/7~I answer
16820   1, 87  |               FP Q[88] A[1] Body Para. 1/7~I answer that, In the
16821   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Body Para. 2/7~But in Aristotle'
16822   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Body Para. 3/7~Nevertheless
16823   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Body Para. 4/7~This opinion,
16824   1, 87  |            passive intellect (Q[70], A[1]). Secondly, this ~opinion
16825   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Body Para. 5/7~Fourthly,
16826   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Body Para. 6/7~Fifthly,
16827   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] Body Para. 7/7~Sixthly,
16828   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
16829   1, 87  |                 SMT FP Q[88] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Augustine
16830   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Augustine
16831   1, 87  |                88] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Augustine may
16832   1, 87  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Augustine may be taken
16833   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply
16834   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The likeness
16835   1, 87  |                88] A[1] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The likeness
16836   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
16837   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: There must
16838   1, 87  |                88] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: There must
16839   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/2~Reply
16840   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 4: This argument
16841   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] R.O. 4 Para. 2/2~Secondly,
16842   1, 87  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88] A[1] R.O. 5 Para. 1/1~Reply
16843   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[1] R.O. 5 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: Sense knows
16844   1, 87  |                88] A[1] R.O. 5 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 5: Sense knows
16845   1, 87  |              FP Q[88] A[2] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect
16846   1, 87  |               Q[88] A[2] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether our intellect can
16847   1, 87  |                 SMT FP Q[88] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16848   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16849   1, 87  |                88] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16850   1, 87  |                2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that our
16851   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[2] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, science
16852   1, 87  |                88] A[2] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, science
16853   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[2] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the human
16854   1, 87  |                88] A[2] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the human
16855   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the only
16856   1, 87  |                88] A[2] Obj. 4 Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the only
16857   1, 87  |                FP Q[88] A[2] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Dionysius
16858   1, 87  |              FP Q[88] A[2] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Dionysius
16859   1, 87  |               FP Q[88] A[2] Body Para. 1/2~I answer that, Averroes
16860   1, 87  |                 SMT FP Q[88] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: From
16861   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: From material
16862   1, 87  |                88] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: From material
16863   1, 87  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: From material things we
16864   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[2] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Science treats
16865   1, 87  |                88] A[2] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: Science treats
16866   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[2] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The human
16867   1, 87  |                88] A[2] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The human soul
16868   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Created immaterial
16869   1, 87  |                88] A[2] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Created immaterial
16870   1, 87  |              FP Q[88] A[3] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether God is the first
16871   1, 87  |               Q[88] A[3] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether God is the first
16872   1, 87  |                 SMT FP Q[88] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16873   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16874   1, 87  |                88] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16875   1, 87  |                3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that God
16876   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[3] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, whatever
16877   1, 87  |                88] A[3] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, whatever
16878   1, 87  |           cometh into this world" (Jn. 1:9). Therefore ~God is our
16879   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[3] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, what is
16880   1, 87  |                88] A[3] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, what is
16881   1, 87  |                FP Q[88] A[3] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, "No man
16882   1, 87  |              FP Q[88] A[3] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, "No man
16883   1, 87  |             seen God at any time" (Jn. 1:18).~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[88]
16884   1, 87  |               FP Q[88] A[3] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, Since the
16885   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[3] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, Since the
16886   1, 87  |       immaterial created substances (A[1]), much less ~can it understand
16887   1, 87  |          according to the Apostle (Rm. 1:20), ~"the invisible things
16888   1, 87  |                 SMT FP Q[88] A[3] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: We
16889   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[3] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: We see and
16890   1, 87  |                88] A[3] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: We see and
16891   1, 87  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: We see and judge of all
16892   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[3] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The axiom, "
16893   1, 87  |                88] A[3] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The axiom, "
16894   1, 87  |                Q[88] A[3] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: If there
16895   1, 87  |                88] A[3] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: If there existed
16896   1, 88  |                SMT FP Q[89] Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF
16897   1, 88  |              SMT FP Q[89] Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE
16898   1, 88  |              eight points of inquiry:~(1) Whether the soul separated
16899   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether
16900   1, 88  |              FP Q[89] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the separated
16901   1, 88  |               Q[89] A[1] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the separated soul
16902   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1:
16903   1, 88  |                 SMT FP Q[89] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16904   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16905   1, 88  |                89] A[1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16906   1, 88  |                1] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16907   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2:
16908   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the human
16909   1, 88  |                89] A[1] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the human
16910   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3:
16911   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if the
16912   1, 88  |                89] A[1] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if the separated
16913   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary,
16914   1, 88  |                FP Q[89] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, The Philosopher
16915   1, 88  |              FP Q[89] A[1] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, The Philosopher
16916   1, 88  |          Philosopher says (De Anima i, 1), "If the soul had ~no proper
16917   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] Body Para. 1/4~I answer
16918   1, 88  |               FP Q[89] A[1] Body Para. 1/4~I answer that, The difficulty
16919   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] Body Para. 2/4~To solve
16920   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] Body Para. 3/4~In order
16921   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] Body Para. 4/4~It is clear
16922   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply
16923   1, 88  |                 SMT FP Q[89] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The
16924   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Philosopher'
16925   1, 88  |                89] A[1] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Philosopher'
16926   1, 88  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Philosopher's words
16927   1, 88  |                 Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply
16928   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The separated
16929   1, 88  |                89] A[1] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The separated
16930   1, 88  |              FP Q[89] A[2] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the separated
16931   1, 88  |               Q[89] A[2] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the separated soul
16932   1, 88  |                 SMT FP Q[89] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16933   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16934   1, 88  |                89] A[2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16935   1, 88  |                2] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16936   1, 88  |               as shown above (Q[88], A[1]). Therefore much less is
16937   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[2] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, whatever
16938   1, 88  |                89] A[2] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, whatever
16939   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[2] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, some philosophers
16940   1, 88  |                89] A[2] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, some philosophers
16941   1, 88  |                FP Q[89] A[2] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Souls
16942   1, 88  |              FP Q[89] A[2] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, Souls apart
16943   1, 88  |               FP Q[89] A[2] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, Augustine
16944   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[2] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, Augustine
16945   1, 88  |              knowing itself ~(Q[88], A[1], ad 1). Therefore from
16946   1, 88  |               itself ~(Q[88], A[1], ad 1). Therefore from the knowledge
16947   1, 88  |              Now ~it was said above (A[1]), that as long as it is
16948   1, 88  |               as shown above (Q[87], A[1]). When, however, it is ~
16949   1, 88  |                 SMT FP Q[89] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The
16950   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The separated
16951   1, 88  |                89] A[2] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The separated
16952   1, 88  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The separated soul is,
16953   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[2] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The separated
16954   1, 88  |                89] A[2] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The separated
16955   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[2] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Man's ultimate
16956   1, 88  |                89] A[2] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Man's ultimate
16957   1, 88  |              FP Q[89] A[3] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the separated
16958   1, 88  |               Q[89] A[3] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the separated soul
16959   1, 88  |                 SMT FP Q[89] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16960   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16961   1, 88  |                89] A[3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16962   1, 88  |                3] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16963   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[3] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, whoever
16964   1, 88  |                89] A[3] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, whoever
16965   1, 88  |                FP Q[89] A[3] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, The devils
16966   1, 88  |              FP Q[89] A[3] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, The devils
16967   1, 88  |               FP Q[89] A[3] Body Para. 1/1 ~I answer that, As stated
16968   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[3] Body Para. 1/1 ~I answer that, As stated
16969   1, 88  |               that, As stated above (A[1]), the separated soul, like
16970   1, 88  |                 SMT FP Q[89] A[3] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Even
16971   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[3] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Even an angel
16972   1, 88  |                89] A[3] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Even an angel
16973   1, 88  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Even an angel does not
16974   1, 88  |                stated above ~(Q[87], A[1]). So it does not follow
16975   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[3] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: As the soul
16976   1, 88  |                89] A[3] R.O. 2 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: As the soul
16977   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[3] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Isidore speaks
16978   1, 88  |                89] A[3] R.O. 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Isidore speaks
16979   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Knowledge
16980   1, 88  |                89] A[3] R.O. 4 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: Knowledge acquired
16981   1, 88  |              FP Q[89] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the separated
16982   1, 88  |               Q[89] A[4] Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the separated soul
16983   1, 88  |                 SMT FP Q[89] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would
16984   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16985   1, 88  |                89] A[4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that
16986   1, 88  |                4] Obj. 1 Para. 1/1~OBJ 1: It would seem that the
16987   1, 88  |                we have shown (Q[86], A[1]). ~Therefore the separated
16988   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the knowledge
16989   1, 88  |                89] A[4] Obj. 2 Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the knowledge
16990   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if it
16991   1, 88  |                89] A[4] Obj. 3 Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, if it knew
16992   1, 88  |                FP Q[89] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, The rich
16993   1, 88  |              FP Q[89] A[4] OTC Para. 1/1~On the contrary, The rich
16994   1, 88  |               FP Q[89] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, Separated
16995   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[4] Body Para. 1/1~I answer that, Separated
16996   1, 88  |              as stated above (Q[86], A[1]). The other ~way of understanding
16997   1, 88  |                 SMT FP Q[89] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The
16998   1, 88  |                Q[89] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The intellect
16999   1, 88  |                89] A[4] R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The intellect
17000   1, 88  |             R.O. 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The intellect does not