Part, Question

 1   1, 18  |            intellect, which takes cognizance of the essence of a thing
 2   2, 15  |           proper to sense to take cognizance of things present; for the ~
 3   2, 31  |  usefulness: for the ~touch takes cognizance of those things which are
 4   2, 45  |      reason?~(3) Whether it takes cognizance of singulars?~(4) Whether
 5   2, 45  |          1~Whether prudence takes cognizance of singulars?~Aquin.: SMT
 6   2, 45  |       that prudence does not take cognizance of ~singulars. For prudence
 7   2, 45  |            prudence does not take cognizance except of universals.~Aquin.:
 8   2, 45  |  Therefore prudence does not take cognizance of singulars.~Aquin.: SMT
 9   2, 45  |           only, but needs to take cognizance of ~singulars also."~Aquin.:
10   2, 45  |          his reason, ~which takes cognizance of universals, and consequently
11   2, 47  |       whereas understanding takes cognizance of universal and immaterial ~
12   2, 51  |           of which counsel takes ~cognizance, is directed to the formation
13   2, 173 | questioned the point, when taking cognizance of ~what he had seen. But
14   2, 178 |           of the senses in taking cognizance of certain ~effects, but
15   2, 178 |      which the imagination has no cognizance. The fifth is ~"above the
16 Suppl, 70|          sensible images to take ~cognizance of such things as they see."
17 Suppl, 79|        humidity: and it will take cognizance not ~only of the excellences