Part, Question

 1   2, 38|         for belligerents to lay ambushes?~(4) Whether it is lawful
 2   2, 38|     Whether it is lawful to lay ambushes in war?~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[
 3   2, 38|      that it is unlawful to lay ambushes in war. For it ~is written (
 4   2, 38|       that which is ~just." But ambushes, since they are a kind of
 5   2, 38| Therefore it is unlawful to lay ambushes even in a just war.~Aquin.:
 6   2, 38|       Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, ambushes and deception seem to be
 7   2, 38|     that it is unlawful to ~lay ambushes for one's enemies. ~Aquin.:
 8   2, 38|  Therefore, since no man wishes ambushes or deceptions to be prepared
 9   2, 38|       to carry on war by laying ambushes.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[40] A[
10   2, 38|         carried on openly or by ambushes": and he proves this by
11   2, 38|         commanded Joshua to lay ambushes for the city of Hai ~(Joshua
12   2, 38|      that, The object of laying ambushes is in order to deceive the ~
13   2, 38|         Para. 3/4~Nor can these ambushes be properly called deceptions,
14   2, 45|       act of prudence "to avoid ambushes." Therefore ~command is
15   2, 45|     ascribes "the avoidance ~of ambushes" to prudence, not as its
16   2, 69|     lawful for a soldier to lay ambushes in a ~battle. Therefore
17   2, 69|   soldier, ~or a general to lay ambushes in a just war, by prudently