Part, Question

 1   1, 48 |     an ~evil of fault in the tempter; but in the one tempted
 2   1, 48 |    is changed to evil by the tempter he falls ~into fault.~Aquin.:
 3   1, 49 |     an ~evil of fault in the tempter; but in the one tempted
 4   1, 49 |    is changed to evil by the tempter he falls ~into fault.~Aquin.:
 5   1, 113|   the immediate end of every tempter is knowledge. But ~sometimes
 6   1, 113|     For Christ overcame the ~tempter most effectively. Yet afterwards
 7   2, 89 |   must not suppose ~that the tempter would have overcome man,
 8   2, 95 |  when one declares oneself a tempter: thus Samson (Judges ~14:
 9   2, 95 |     or doubt, either in the ~tempter (as when one tests a thing
10   2, 95 |  tempt God in order that the tempter himself ~may know God's
11   2, 163|   James 1:13, "God is not a ~tempter of evils."~Aquin.: SMT SS
12   2, 163|    free will, to ~resist the tempter. Now the condition attaching
13   2, 163| temptation. Consequently the tempter's assault was not a ~punishment
14   3, 41 |   after "He ~was hungry, the tempter" came "to Him," because,
15   3, 41 |   was hungry": and then "the tempter ~came to Him."~Aquin.: SMT
16   3, 41 |     FS, Q[84], A[4]. But the tempter ~only deals with three,