Part, Question

 1   1, 13  |          and ~the like, and these relatives are called predicamental [
 2   1, 13  |           and the like: and these relatives are called transcendental ~[
 3   2, 115 |   liberality not to neglect your ~relatives if you know them to be in
 4   3, 35  |           wherefore if one of two relatives be destroyed, the other
 5   3, 35  |        OBJ 3: Further, one of two relatives enters the definition of
 6   3, 35  |           it is clear that of two relatives, one is specified from the
 7 Suppl, 55|    connection with her husband's ~relatives as to the degree but not
 8 Suppl, 55|      matrimonial lawsuit only the relatives are heard, ~as stated in
 9 Suppl, 55|   denounced. But the marriage ~of relatives by affinity and consanguinity
10 Suppl, 55|    consanguinity except from the ~relatives, since these know with greater
11 Suppl, 55|      ill-will ~unless he wish the relatives to prove his assertion.
12 Suppl, 55|           accusing when there are relatives who are silent, and by ~
13 Suppl, 55| accusation. On the other hand the relatives, ~however nearly related
14 Suppl, 55|         from giving evidence. Now relatives are especially open to ~
15 Suppl, 55|     quasi-spiritual lawsuit; that relatives are allowed as witnesses;
16 Suppl, 59|    understand our brother, wife, ~relatives and children." Now these