Part, Question

 1   1, 40  |     another. Therefore the first distinctive principle in God cannot
 2   1, 40  |  signifies the relation which is distinctive and ~constitutive of the
 3   1, 40  |          the origin which is not distinctive and constitutive of the ~
 4   1, 40  |     another. Therefore the first distinctive principle in God cannot
 5   1, 40  |  signifies the relation which is distinctive and ~constitutive of the
 6   1, 40  |          the origin which is not distinctive and constitutive of the ~
 7   2, 45  |     according to a formal aspect distinctive of powers, i.e. the ~intellective
 8   3, 63  |          to signify some kind of distinctive ~sign. But Christ's members
 9   3, 63  |        Further, a character is a distinctive sign. Now a sign, as ~Augustine
10   3, 63  |         thus: "A character is a ~distinctive mark printed in a man's
11   3, 70  |        Orth. iv) they ~needed no distinctive sign while they dwelt apart
12   3, 72  |          For a character means a distinctive sign. But a man is not ~
13   3, 72  |   character of Confirmation is a distinctive sign, not ~between unbelievers
14 Suppl, 30| character. For a ~character is a distinctive sign. Now just as one who
15 Suppl, 35|        Further, a character is a distinctive sign. Now there is something ~
16 Suppl, 90|           1/1~I answer that, The distinctive principle of the mansions