Part, Question

 1   1, 52 |        by a place, ~because the container is more formal than the
 2   1, 52 | immediately by way of a perfect container, as was said (A[1]), ~there
 3   1, 55 |    according to the mode of the container. But an angel has an intellectual ~
 4   1, 53 |        by a place, ~because the container is more formal than the
 5   1, 53 | immediately by way of a perfect container, as was said (A[1]), ~there
 6   1, 56 |    according to the mode of the container. But an angel has an intellectual ~
 7   2, 28 |          But the same cannot be container and contents. ~Therefore
 8   2, 28 |        a thing ~from being both container and contents in different
 9   2, 66 |    according to the mode of the container. But it is the ~other way
10   2, 67 |  according to the mode of their container. Hence the "possible" ~intellect
11   2, 107|          Further, who holds the container holds the contents. If, ~
12   2, 22 |   according ~to the mode of the container (De Causis xii). On the
13   3, 57 |     containing; hence the first container has ~the formality of first
14   3, 62 |     what is contained is in the container. But grace is not ~in the
15   3, 76 |     compared with the extrinsic container. And ~therefore it is not
16   3, 78 |        of metonymy; because the container is put for the contained,