Part, Question

 1   1, 36  |    matter; as for instance ~one smith produces many knives distinct
 2   1, 39  |          thus we may say that a smith works "by" ~a hammer. Hence
 3   1, 76  |         one action, as when the smith strikes ~with one hammer,
 4   1, 39  |          thus we may say that a smith works "by" ~a hammer. Hence
 5   1, 75  |         one action, as when the smith strikes ~with one hammer,
 6   1, 83  |   through the senses"; for ~the smith does not seek knowledge
 7   1, 83  |         Now it is ~clear that a smith cannot judge perfectly of
 8   2, 56  |      good ~grammarian or a good smith. And for this reason science
 9   2, 58  |        its proper matter, ~as a smith without iron. Therefore
10   2, 85  |    condition of matter. Thus, a smith in ~order to make a knife,
11   2, 121 |         more imperfect than the smith. Moreover, Seneca was a
12   3, 19  | operation of fire, but not of a smith, except in so ~far as he
13   3, 78  |        as when we say that ~the smith alone makes a knife we do
14 Suppl, 29| instruments, and the unity of a smith's work is not destroyed
15 Suppl, 94|       by the forethought of the smith, according as the effect