Part, Question

 1   2, 22  |      pathe}, we prefer ~to call disturbances rather than diseases (Tusc.
 2   2, 22  |          iv. 5)] for instance, ~disturbances; by some, affections or
 3   2, 24  |         s ~passions diseases or disturbances of the soul" [*Those things
 4   2, 24  |       pathe}, we prefer to call disturbances rather than diseases ~(Tusc.
 5   2, 24  |       not called "diseases" or "disturbances" of the ~soul, save when
 6   2, 24  |         appetite, considered as disturbances or ailments. But if we give
 7   2, 33  |   absent thing. Now such bodily disturbances hinder the use of reason;
 8   2, 59  |           in place of the three disturbances: viz. instead ~of covetousness, "
 9   2, 70  |       must ~understand whatever disturbances arise from fornication:
10   2, 38  |   common weal against ~internal disturbances, when they punish evil-doers,
11   2, 139 |       of temperance to calm all disturbances of the mind and ~to enforce
12   2, 178 | sensible things, and by outward disturbances. Now the moral virtues curb ~
13   2, 178 |      occasions of quarrels and ~disturbances. Hence the moral virtues
14   2, 179 |       excludes not only outward disturbances ~but also the inward disturbance
15 Suppl, 72|        flow of the sea, and the disturbances of winds and so forth), ~