Part, Question

 1   1, 93  | enigma, for an enigma implies obscurity, as Augustine ~says (De
 2   1, 93  |   says (De Trin. xv, 9). Now, obscurity resulted from sin. Therefore
 3   1, 93  |       we must remark that the obscurity which is implied in ~the
 4   1, 93  | effect: secondly, we may take obscurity as an effect of sin, so
 5   1, 94  |  innocence; for it implies an obscurity of knowledge which seems
 6   2, 67  |       in part, viz. as to its obscurity, and remains ~in part, viz.
 7   2, 95  |        expressed, lest by its obscurity it lead to misunderstanding;
 8   2, 5   |  original state there was not obscurity either in the angels or
 9   2, 5   |   there was a certain natural obscurity in ~the human and angelic
10   2, 5   |    the Divine light: and this obscurity ~suffices for faith.~Aquin.:
11   2, 7   |    purify the ~intellect from obscurity, since it is a veiled knowledge.
12   2, 7   |    Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The obscurity of faith does not pertain
13   2, 172 |   prophecy implies a certain ~obscurity, and remoteness from the
14 Suppl, 72|       knowledge is devoid of ~obscurity in holy men. But he is not