Part, Question

 1   2, 65  |           3) The injustice of the defendant in defending himself; (4) ~
 2   2, 65  |        offense. Now sometimes the defendant is not the subject of the
 3   2, 65  |            for instance when the ~defendant belongs to another diocese
 4   2, 65  |          OBJ 3: The bishop of the defendant's diocese becomes the latter'
 5   2, 65  |     exempt: unless ~perchance the defendant offend in a matter exempt
 6   2, 65  |     prosecutor, and the other the defendant. Therefore ~in criminal
 7   2, 65  |        judge between accuser and ~defendant, while the other is that
 8   2, 66  | accusation, by collusion with the defendant, dissembling his ~proofs,
 9   2, 66  |      consent the accuser and the ~defendant acquit one another - in
10   2, 67  |        JUSTICE ON THE PART OF THE DEFENDANT (FOUR ARTICLES)~We must
11   2, 67  |       justice on ~the part of the defendant. Under this head there are
12 Suppl, 22|         cannot be both judge and ~defendant in the same trial), or over
13 Suppl, 55|          suit is uncontested, the defendant may be ~excommunicated if
14 Suppl, 84|     witness, the accuser, and the defendant need to be acquainted with