Part, Question

 1   2, 66|  rendered unjust by calumny, collusion or evasion?~Aquin.: SMT
 2   2, 66| rendered unjust by ~calumny, collusion or evasion. For according
 3   2, 66|     the same authority that "collusion ~consists in hiding the
 4   2, 66|      not ~rendered unjust by collusion.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[68] A[
 5   2, 66|    either of ~calumny, or of collusion, or of evasion."~Aquin.:
 6   2, 66|  accusation. This belongs to collusion ~[prevaricatio] for "he
 7   2, 66|    for "he that is guilty of collusion is like one who rides ~astraddle [
 8   2, 66|  about a crime is guilty of ~collusion, but only he who deceitfully
 9   2, 66|     makes the accusation, by collusion with the defendant, dissembling
10   2, 66|     an innocent man, through collusion with the latter's adversary, ~
11   2, 67|     accuser who is guilty of collusion with the accused, ~is punishable
12   2, 67|   imposed on the accused for collusion with the accuser. ~Therefore
13   2, 67|     the accuser is guilty of collusion with the accused and ~the
14   2, 67|      sins if he is guilty of collusion with his ~adversary. Nevertheless