Part, Question

 1   1, 29  |      person. For soul, flesh, and bone belong to the nature ~of
 2   1, 29  |         soul, this flesh and this bone belong to the nature ~of
 3   1, 30  |     signifies this flesh and this bone. But there is ~this difference -
 4   1, 83  |         result, ~for instance, of bone, flesh, and the like; thus
 5   1, 84  |         common, such as flesh and bone; and individual, as this ~
 6   2, 102 |           they should not break a bone ~thereof, because in their
 7   3, 1   |       from Gn. 2:23. "This now is bone of my bones," etc. ~which
 8   3, 31  |         to Gn. 2:23: "This now is bone of my bones, ~and flesh
 9   3, 31  |           proportion of flesh and bone, which belonged to him,
10   3, 76  |            You shall not ~break a bone thereof." And therefore
11 Suppl, 54|          Gn. 29:14): "Thou art my bone and ~my flesh," on account
12 Suppl, 54|          is potentially flesh and bone.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[54] A[
13 Suppl, 54|           Gn. 2:23): "This now is bone of my ~bones and flesh of
14 Suppl, 76|          or the ~various parts of bone; secondly, as of various
15 Suppl, 76| heterogeneous whole, for instance bone and flesh. Accordingly if
16 Suppl, 77|         are potentially flesh and bone. ~Therefore they are not
17 Suppl, 77|      under ~the form of flesh and bone all belongs to the truth
18 Suppl, 80|          the nature of flesh and ~bone is incompatible with the