Part, Question

 1   2, 70| Isidore says (Etym. x) that a reviler [contumeliosus] "is ~hasty
 2   2, 70|       reviled, encourages the reviler. But ~one ought not to do
 3   2, 70|       but rather reply to the reviler.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[72] A[
 4   2, 70|    First, for the good of the reviler; namely, that ~his daring
 5   2, 70|     The daring of the railing reviler should be checked with ~
 6   2, 70|    intention of provoking the reviler to anger, but it would be
 7   2, 71|    the words are uttered, the reviler speaking ~openly against
 8   2, 71|     the injury inflicted, the reviler injuring a ~man's honor,
 9   2, 71|       On the other ~hand, the reviler speaks against a man to
10   2, 71|      generation. Moreover the reviler is not the sufficient cause
11   2, 73|      and for this purpose the reviler and the backbiter speak
12   2, 73|     done openly: because ~the reviler would seem to take another'
13   2, 74| Accordingly it belongs to the reviler, the tale-bearer, the backbiter