Part, Question

 1   2, 152 |     and again (Gn. 38:18) that Juda was with Thamar whom he ~
 2   2, 152 |        65], A[5], ad 2). As to Juda there is no need to excuse ~
 3   3, 31  |     David ~was of the tribe of Juda, as is shown Mt. 1, it seems
 4   3, 31  | married a wife of the tribe of Juda, ~Elizabeth, daughter of
 5   3, 31  |     the crimes of the kings of Juda, Christ ~would be born of
 6   3, 31  |     women. But he does mention Juda's brethren, in ~order to
 7   3, 31  |   pride of birth: for many of ~Juda's brethren were born of
 8   3, 35  |   shall not be taken away from Juda, nor a ruler from his thigh,
 9 Suppl, 59|       written (Malachi 2:11): "Juda hath profaned the holiness ~
10 Suppl, 65|        a proof of this is that Juda, who did not abhor to commit
11 Suppl, 65|      an incentive. Thus, ~too, Juda avoided a lie while he avoided
12 Suppl, 65|  assertion ~from the fact that Juda had intercourse with Thamar.
13 Suppl, 93|       the lion of the tribe of Juda . . . hath ~prevailed" -