Part, Question

 1   1, 34 |  Para. 1/1 ~Reply OBJ 1: The Arians, who sprang from Origen,
 2   1, 34 |    was condemned, not as the Arians ~pretended, because he asserted
 3   1, 39 |   Nicaea adopted against the Arians, ~means that the three persons
 4   1, 41 |     from nothing. ~Thus, the Arians, wishing to prove the Son
 5   1, 42 | increase or decrease, as the Arians do, who sunder the Trinity
 6   1, 39 |   Nicaea adopted against the Arians, ~means that the three persons
 7   1, 41 |     from nothing. ~Thus, the Arians, wishing to prove the Son
 8   1, 42 | increase or decrease, as the Arians do, who sunder the Trinity
 9   2, 182|       where he says that the Arians ~maintained that "no distinction
10   3, 5  |      Christ, saying with the Arians, that Christ took flesh
11   3, 60 |  less," with ~which form the Arians baptized: and consequently
12   3, 82 |     receive the laity of the Arians and other ~pestilential
13   3, 83 |     you find churches of the Arians, consecrate them as Catholic ~