Part, Question

 1   1, 5 |  though they themselves were subsistences, but because it ~is through
 2   1, 13| apprehend and signify simple subsistences only by way of ~compound
 3   1, 29|      we say ~there are three subsistences in God; which implies that "
 4   1, 29|      but ~also substand. But subsistences are so called from subsisting,
 5   1, 29|   these are not the same ~as subsistences.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[29] A[
 6   1, 29| plurally in God, and "three ~subsistences," so the Greeks say "three
 7   1, 56|  since acts belong to single subsistences. But nothing single is ~
 8   1, 57|  since acts belong to single subsistences. But nothing single is ~
 9   3, 2 |      of ~the Incarnation two subsistences or two persons, let him
10   3, 2 |     the uniting divides the ~subsistences in the one Christ, only
11   3, 2 |   ascribes to two persons or subsistences such ~words as are in the
12   3, 2 |     so as not to confuse the subsistences), but not one thing and ~