Part, Question

 1   1, 7   |        this would imply that two contradictories are true at ~the same time),
 2   1, 16  |         so. Consequently mutual ~contradictories seem to be true as seen
 3   1, 19  |      exists not, ~are opposed as contradictories; yet the statements that
 4   1, 84  |            and that consequently contradictories are true simultaneously.
 5   1, 91  |         rarefied, is to combine ~contradictories - viz. the definition with
 6   1, 104 |     Further, God cannot make two contradictories to be true at the ~same
 7   2, 65  | indemonstrable principle, that ~"contradictories cannot both be true at the
 8   3, 10  |       since this would mean that contradictories exist together. ~Therefore
 9   3, 75  |       OBJ 3: Further, one of two contradictories must be true. But this ~
10   3, 76  |        motion and ~at rest, else contradictories would be verified of the
11   3, 77  |         For it would follow that contradictories can exist at the one time:
12 Suppl, 80|          defined is ~to make two contradictories true at the same time. Now