Part, Question

 1 Suppl, 66|    the man is not reckoned a bigamist, because ~the first marriage
 2 Suppl, 66|      admit to holy orders a ~bigamist, or one who has married
 3 Suppl, 66|   after Baptism, he is not a bigamist. Therefore ~bigamy is removed
 4 Suppl, 66|  Para. 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, a bigamist is irregular because he
 5 Suppl, 66|   like manner one ~who was a bigamist before Baptism cannot be
 6 Suppl, 66|   Whether it is lawful for a bigamist to receive a dispensation?~
 7 Suppl, 66|    would seem unlawful for a bigamist to be granted a ~dispensation.
 8 Suppl, 66|    undone. If, ~therefore, a bigamist can lawfully receive a dispensation,
 9 Suppl, 66| bishop of ~Palermo who was a bigamist, as stated in the gloss
10 Suppl, 66|    applies if he should be a bigamist." Therefore he may at least
11 Suppl, 66|   order that a man ~be not a bigamist, which is evident from the
12 Suppl, 66|      from the fact that if a bigamist ~present himself for orders,