Part, Question

 1   1, 5  |  according to priority and ~posteriority. Hence it is predicated
 2   1, 16 |   in order of priority ~and posteriority seem not to be convertible.
 3   1, 35 |     in God does not signify posteriority, but only ~assimilation.~
 4   1, 42 | which implies priority and ~posteriority of time. Thus it is clear
 5   1, 42 | exists neither priority nor posteriority, as declared by ~Athanasius.
 6   1, 53 |  according to ~priority and posteriority of local movement, as the
 7   1, 42 | which implies priority and ~posteriority of time. Thus it is clear
 8   1, 42 | exists neither priority nor posteriority, as declared by ~Athanasius.
 9   1, 54 |  according to ~priority and posteriority of local movement, as the
10   2, 118|   according to priority and posteriority, as ~"being" of substance
11   3, 26 |   if ~St. Thomas held for a posteriority of time, no matter how short,