1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3117
Part, Question
501 1, 39 | thing ~itself. Hence, as intellect and thing in their essential
502 1, 40 | that, Abstraction by the intellect is twofold - when the ~universal
503 1, 40 | circle is abstracted by the intellect from any sensible matter.
504 1, 40 | no longer remains in the ~intellect, but animal alone remains.
505 1, 40 | the matter remain in the intellect; ~as, for instance, if we
506 1, 40 | brass, there ~remains in our intellect separately the understanding
507 1, 40 | essence remains in ~the intellect if the properties are removed;
508 1, 41 | proceeds by mode of the intellect, as the Word. ~But every
509 1, 41 | which is the concept of ~the intellect; and the Holy Ghost proceeds
510 1, 41 | effects, and not as regards ~intellect and will, as stated above (
511 1, 41 | designate by different terms the intellect and the act of ~understanding
512 1, 42 | procession of the word ~from the intellect represents it more exactly;
513 1, 42 | its source except in an intellect passing from ~potentiality
514 1, 42 | according to nature and intellect. But in the divine ~persons
515 1, 42 | as a ~point; according to intellect, as the principle of demonstration;
516 1, 42 | word is not outside the ~intellect, inasmuch as it remains
517 1, 43 | to the perfection of the ~intellect are not gifts of sanctifying
518 1, 43 | proceeds as the word of ~the intellect, it seems unfitting for
519 1, 43 | namely, which belong to the intellect, and in respect ~of which
520 1, 43 | the illumination of the intellect and the kindling of the ~
521 1, 44 | instance, affinity, ~discord, intellect, or something of that kind.
522 1, 44 | ideas by force of the active intellect from the ~particular conditions;
523 1, 45 | the cause of things by His intellect and will, ~just as the craftsman
524 1, 45 | referred to the ~acts of intellect and will, as was said above (
525 1, 45 | proceeds as the word of the intellect; and the Holy Ghost proceeds
526 1, 45 | rational creatures, possessing intellect ~and will, there is found
527 1, 46 | everything which works by intellect works from some ~principle,
528 1, 46 | craftsmen. But God acts by ~intellect: therefore His work has
529 1, 46 | conclusion, except as ~to that intellect which deliberates in order
530 1, 46 | movement. Such is the human intellect, but not the ~divine intellect (
531 1, 46 | intellect, but not the ~divine intellect (Q[14], AA[7],12).~Aquin.:
532 1, 47 | together; ~and he said that the intellect distinguishes things by
533 1, 50 | secondly, what belongs to their intellect; thirdly, what ~belongs
534 1, 50 | produces the creature by His intellect and will (Q[14], A[8]; Q[
535 1, 50 | distinction between sense and intellect, ~thought that nothing existed
536 1, 50 | 3~But the very fact that intellect is above sense is a reasonable
537 1, 50 | things comprehensible by the intellect ~alone.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
538 1, 50 | are distinguished by ~the intellect are really distinct. Now
539 1, 50 | incorporeal substance, ~the intellect apprehends that which distinguishes
540 1, 50 | individual forms ~which the intellect cannot apprehend as such.
541 1, 50 | things distinguished by the intellect are not necessarily ~distinguished
542 1, 50 | in reality; because the intellect does not apprehend things ~
543 1, 50 | things which are below our intellect exist in our intellect in
544 1, 50 | our intellect exist in our intellect in a simpler ~mode than
545 1, 50 | other ~hand, are above our intellect; and hence our intellect
546 1, 50 | intellect; and hence our intellect cannot attain to ~apprehend
547 1, 50 | conception; for, inasmuch as our intellect ~considers it as indeterminate,
548 1, 50 | the receptive mode of the intellect ~and of matter were the
549 1, 50 | something else. But the intellect does ~not receive the form
550 1, 50 | intelligible form is in the intellect ~according to the very nature
551 1, 50 | such is it so known by the ~intellect. Hence such a way of receiving
552 1, 50 | than another, and of keener intellect. Therefore the ~angels do
553 1, 54 | an active and a passive intellect?~(5) Is there in them any
554 1, 54 | of knowledge besides the intellect?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[
555 1, 54 | simpler than the active ~intellect of a soul. But the substance
556 1, 54 | substance of the active intellect is its own ~action; as is
557 1, 54 | that "the ~action of the intellect is life." But "since in
558 1, 54 | Therefore the action of the intellect is the essence of an angel
559 1, 54 | is. ~But in an angel the intellect and the object understood
560 1, 54 | understanding, which is between the intellect and the thing understood, ~
561 1, 54 | Reply OBJ 1: When the active intellect is said to be its own action, ~
562 1, 54 | cannot be said of the passive intellect, for this ~has no actions
563 1, 54 | says that "the act of the intellect is life."~Aquin.: SMT FP
564 1, 54 | essence. For, "mind" and ~"intellect" express the power of understanding.
565 1, 54 | OBJ 1: An angel is called "intellect" and "mind," because all
566 1, 54 | an active and a passive intellect in an angel?~Aquin.: SMT
567 1, 54 | an active and a passive ~intellect in an angel. The Philosopher
568 1, 54 | an active ~and a passive intellect in an angel.~Aquin.: SMT
569 1, 54 | function of the passive intellect is to ~receive; whereas
570 1, 54 | function of the active ~intellect, as is made clear in De
571 1, 54 | an active and a passive intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[
572 1, 54 | distinction of active and passive intellect in us ~is in relation to
573 1, 54 | compared to the passive ~intellect as colors to the sight;
574 1, 54 | sight; but to the active intellect as colors ~to the light,
575 1, 54 | is no active and passive intellect in the angel.~Aquin.: SMT
576 1, 54 | for admitting a passive intellect in us is ~derived from the
577 1, 54 | denominated the passive intellect. The necessity for admitting
578 1, 54 | for admitting an active ~intellect is due to this - that the
579 1, 54 | us is called the active intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[
580 1, 54 | an active and a passive intellect in ~them, except equivocally.~
581 1, 54 | an active ~and a passive intellect in them.~Aquin.: SMT FP
582 1, 54 | the function of the active intellect to enlighten, ~not another
583 1, 54 | enlighten, ~not another intellect, but things which are intelligible
584 1, 54 | belongs to the passive intellect to be in potentiality with
585 1, 54 | the notion of an active intellect: neither does it belong ~
586 1, 54 | it belong ~to the passive intellect for the angel to be enlightened
587 1, 54 | names of active ~and passive intellect, he will then be speaking
588 1, 54 | through ~bodily organs, as intellect and will: these are not
589 1, 54 | the ~soul's powers only intellect and will can belong to them.~
590 1, 54 | substances are divided into intellect and will. And it is in ~
591 1, 55 | are without matter, the intellect ~is the same as the object
592 1, 55 | medium through which the intellect understands, is ~compared
593 1, 55 | understands, is ~compared to the intellect understanding it as its
594 1, 55 | because the object of the intellect is universal being or universal ~
595 1, 55 | by his essence; and his ~intellect must be perfected by some
596 1, 55 | potentiality: so likewise the intellect in act ~is said to be the
597 1, 55 | that the substance of the ~intellect is itself the similitude
598 1, 55 | are without matter, the intellect is the same thing as ~the
599 1, 55 | understood," as to say that "the intellect in act is the thing ~understood
600 1, 55 | the light of the ~active intellect of the soul. But the light
601 1, 55 | the light of the active intellect ~abstracts intelligible
602 1, 55 | Further, the species in the intellect are indifferent to what
603 1, 55 | a form which is in the intellect by abstraction from matter
604 1, 55 | species of the angelic intellect are more or less universal.~
605 1, 55 | the more according as the intellect is lower.~Aquin.: SMT FP
606 1, 55 | comes of their weakness of intellect: while there are others
607 1, 55 | are others of stronger ~intellect, who can grasp many things
608 1, 55 | particulars, in so far as the intellect knowing it derives its knowledge ~
609 1, 55 | things. But if there be an intellect which does not derive its ~
610 1, 55 | the ~universal; for the intellect, which by one universal
611 1, 56 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the intellect is moved by the intelligible
612 1, 56 | OBJ 3: It belongs to the intellect, in so far as if is in ~
613 1, 56 | not happen ~in the angelic intellect, especially as regards the
614 1, 56 | Besides the action of the intellect is not of the ~same nature
615 1, 56 | text. 4), that if the human intellect ~were to have in itself
616 1, 56 | color. But as the human intellect is ~disposed for understanding
617 1, 56 | Therefore, since the angelic intellect ~has within itself some
618 1, 56 | because that whereby the intellect ~understands is something
619 1, 56 | is something within the intellect; whereas the Trinity alone ~
620 1, 56 | such angel ~existing in his intellect, which differs from the
621 1, 56 | but his species in the intellect of another angel ~is not
622 1, 56 | is infinitely above the intellect of an angel. But ~what is
623 1, 56 | not known by any created ~intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[56] A[
624 1, 56 | OBJ 2: Since an angel's intellect and essence are infinitely ~
625 1, 57 | do ~likewise. But man's intellect, which in the order of nature
626 1, 57 | species which he has in his ~intellect. And thus the intelligible
627 1, 57 | species which are in the intellect ~of an angel are perfections
628 1, 57 | and acts in regard to that intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[
629 1, 57 | the images of bodies. The intellect alone ~apprehends the essences
630 1, 57 | that the object of the intellect is "what a thing is," regarding ~
631 1, 57 | material things are in the ~intellect of man and angels, as the
632 1, 57 | But some things are ~in an intellect or in the soul according
633 1, 57 | connatural to him; just as our intellect has, by ~species which it
634 1, 57 | object ~singulars, but the intellect, universals." Now, in the
635 1, 57 | immaterial things by his intellect, and things singular and
636 1, 57 | knowledge, ~namely, the intellect, does not know. Hence Aristotle
637 1, 57 | Philosopher is speaking of our intellect, which ~apprehends only
638 1, 57 | the species in the angel's intellect, which are images ~drawn
639 1, 57 | of time. But ~the angel's intellect is above time; because,
640 1, 57 | angel, and every created intellect, fall far short of ~God'
641 1, 57 | be known by ~any created intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[
642 1, 57 | 2: Although the angel's intellect is above that time according ~
643 1, 57 | succession in the angel's ~intellect, not all things that happen
644 1, 57 | Although the species in the intellect of an angel, in so ~far
645 1, 57 | the same relation to the ~intellect as shapes do to bodies.
646 1, 57 | Further, the ideas of our intellect resemble the angel more
647 1, 57 | know the thoughts of the intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[
648 1, 57 | thought or ~will: because the intellect or will is not subject to
649 1, 58 | 1) Whether the angel's intellect be sometimes in potentiality,
650 1, 58 | be error in the angel's intellect?~(6) Whether his knowledge
651 1, 58 | 1/1~Whether the angel's intellect is sometimes in potentiality,
652 1, 58 | would seem that the angel's intellect is sometimes in ~potentiality
653 1, 58 | Therefore the ~angel's intellect is sometimes in potentiality.~
654 1, 58 | contemplation." Now a contemplating intellect is not in potentiality,
655 1, 58 | but ~in act. Therefore the intellect of an angel is not in potentiality.~
656 1, 58 | 8; Phys. ~viii, 32), the intellect is in potentiality in two
657 1, 58 | the first way an angel's intellect is ~never in potentiality
658 1, 58 | the second way an angel's intellect can be in potentiality with ~
659 1, 58 | the same way, the angel's intellect is never so in ~potentiality
660 1, 58 | is understood unless the intellect be informed ~by an intelligible
661 1, 58 | Therefore neither can one ~intellect simultaneously understand
662 1, 58 | neither by sense nor by intellect are they grasped ~by one
663 1, 58 | grasped both by sense and ~intellect all at once and by one operation;
664 1, 58 | text. 23. ~In this way our intellect understands together both
665 1, 58 | according as its image is in the intellect. All ~things, then, which
666 1, 58 | Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 2: The intellect is informed by the intelligible
667 1, 58 | the Word. Therefore the intellect of an angel ~knows by discursive
668 1, 58 | higher can do. But ~the human intellect can syllogize, and know
669 1, 58 | discursive method. Therefore the intellect of the angel, ~which is
670 1, 58 | understood [intelligi]; hence "intellect" is defined as the habit
671 1, 58 | speech is a sign of the intellect. But in speaking to ~men,
672 1, 58 | composition and of division in the intellect; as is manifest from many ~
673 1, 58 | I answer that, As in the intellect, when reasoning, the conclusion
674 1, 58 | the principle, so in the intellect composing and dividing, ~
675 1, 58 | the subject. For if our intellect were to ~see at once the
676 1, 58 | In like manner, if the intellect ~in apprehending the quiddity
677 1, 58 | the self-same ~reason our intellect understands by discursion,
678 1, 58 | can be falsehood in the intellect of an angel?~Aquin.: SMT
679 1, 58 | falsehood in the angel's ~intellect. For perversity appertains
680 1, 58 | can be falsehood in the intellect of the angels.~Aquin.: SMT
681 1, 58 | falsehood or error in its intellect. But ~Dionysius (Div. Nom.
682 1, 58 | what a thing is. Now the ~intellect is always true as regards
683 1, 58 | means to the end; and the ~intellect at the same instant perceives
684 1, 59 | angel is his nature, or his intellect?~(3) Is there free-will
685 1, 59 | goodness; ~this belongs to the intellect. This is most perfectly
686 1, 59 | since the angels by their intellect know the ~universal aspect
687 1, 59 | way from that in ~which intellect surpasses reason. Reason
688 1, 59 | appetite ~belongs to sense. But intellect and reason differ as to
689 1, 59 | of ~knowing; because the intellect knows by simple intuition,
690 1, 59 | reason comes to know what intellect learns without it, ~namely,
691 1, 59 | reason and on the part of intellect is ~the same. Therefore
692 1, 59 | the will differs from the intellect?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
693 1, 59 | does not differ from the ~intellect and from the nature. For
694 1, 59 | some ~species within his intellect. Therefore the angel inclines
695 1, 59 | differ from his nature or his intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
696 1, 59 | Further, the object of the intellect is the true, while the ~
697 1, 59 | 4]]. Therefore will and ~intellect are not really different.~
698 1, 59 | particular good, to wit, of the ~intellect. Therefore the will, whose
699 1, 59 | does not differ ~from the intellect, whose object is the true.~
700 1, 59 | things only, while ~their intellect regards both good and bad
701 1, 59 | angels is distinct from their intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
702 1, 59 | neither their nature nor their intellect. That it is not their ~nature
703 1, 59 | be the same thing as the intellect ~of angel or man. Because
704 1, 59 | knower; consequently the intellect extends itself to ~what
705 1, 59 | outside it. Consequently intellect and will must ~necessarily
706 1, 59 | universal good. ~Therefore both intellect and will are His nature.~
707 1, 59 | suffices for the difference of ~intellect from will.~Aquin.: SMT FP
708 1, 59 | good is apprehended by the intellect as something true; ~while
709 1, 59 | angels on the part of their intellect there is no such indifference; ~
710 1, 59 | already (Q[58], A[5]), their intellect is not ~deceived as to things
711 1, 59 | an agent endowed with an intellect can act with a judgment ~
712 1, 59 | Consequently, ~wherever there is intellect, there is free-will. It
713 1, 59 | manifest ~that just as there is intellect, so is there free-will in
714 1, 59 | perfect in his nature, if his ~intellect were not determined to every
715 1, 59 | does the judgment of the intellect. ~Yet it is true that liberty,
716 1, 60 | Now nature comes before intellect, ~because the nature of
717 1, 60 | in such subjects as have ~intellect. But it is common to every
718 1, 60 | perfection of either sense or intellect. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[
719 1, 60 | everything they can ~know, as our intellect is disposed towards first
720 1, 60 | with respect to both his intellect and ~his will. For the intellect
721 1, 60 | intellect and ~his will. For the intellect knows principles naturally;
722 1, 60 | the principle does in the ~intellect, as is laid down in Phys.
723 1, 60 | difference on the part of the intellect and on the ~part of the
724 1, 62 | nature of every created intellect, ~as was shown above (Q[
725 1, 62 | nature of every created ~intellect. Consequently no rational
726 1, 62 | referred to opposites. For ~the intellect cannot but assent to naturally
727 1, 62 | is disposed just ~as the intellect is to conclusions. Now it
728 1, 62 | belongs to ~the power of the intellect to be able to proceed to
729 1, 63 | angels to fetter reason or ~intellect, as is manifest from what
730 1, 64 | 1) Of their darkness of intellect;~(2) Of their obstinacy
731 1, 64 | 1/1~Whether the demons' intellect is darkened by privation
732 1, 64 | would seem that the demons' intellect is darkened by being ~deprived
733 1, 64 | from the weakness of our ~intellect which draws its knowledge
734 1, 64 | according to his nature, is an intellect or mind: since on account ~
735 1, 64 | surpassing the bounds of our intellect; and not merely because
736 1, 64 | not merely because our ~intellect draws knowledge from phantasms.
737 1, 64 | proportion not only of the human intellect, but even of the ~angelic.
738 1, 64 | of the perfection of his intellect he can of ~his nature have
739 1, 64 | particular objects, while the intellect considers universals. ~Now
740 1, 64 | respect, that the angel by his intellect apprehends immovably, as
741 1, 65 | as the senses for the ~intellect, the lungs for the heart;
742 1, 65 | in matter, but in ~the intellect only. Thus they say that
743 1, 65 | from forms existing in the ~intellect of spiritual creatures (
744 1, 65 | the species of the angelic intellect, which are, as ~it were,
745 1, 65 | intelligible forms of the angelic intellect, from which they ~proceed
746 1, 65 | the types in the Divine ~intellect, by which the seeds of forms
747 1, 66 | Anaxagoras, who taught that the intellect alone was distinct and ~
748 1, 67 | knowledge obtained through the ~intellect, as in those words: "Blessed
749 1, 67 | senses; for the object of the intellect is what ~a thing is, as
750 1, 68 | than the most exalted human intellect. ~Hence, whatever these
751 1, 70 | to their production. The intellect, for example, ~makes use
752 1, 70 | But the operations ~of the intellect, which does not act through
753 1, 70 | of the operations of the ~intellect. It remains, then, only
754 1, 75 | the nature of the human intellect is not ~only incorporeal,
755 1, 75 | clear that by means of the ~intellect man can have knowledge of
756 1, 75 | we call the mind or the ~intellect has an operation "per se"
757 1, 75 | soul, which is called the intellect or the mind, is something ~
758 1, 75 | necessary for the action of the intellect, not ~as its origin of action,
759 1, 75 | the phantasm ~is to the intellect what color is to the sight.
760 1, 75 | dependence on the body prove the intellect to be non-subsistent; ~otherwise
761 1, 75 | intelligible ~objects. But the intellect, apart from the body, apprehends
762 1, 75 | distinction between ~sense and intellect, and referred both a corporeal
763 1, 75 | drew a distinction between intellect and ~sense; yet he referred
764 1, 75 | occurs in the case of the intellect. For an intellect that understands ~
765 1, 75 | of the intellect. For an intellect that understands ~the highest
766 1, 75 | accidental, inasmuch as the ~intellect requires the operation of
767 1, 75 | and "now," whereas the intellect apprehends ~existence absolutely,
768 1, 75 | everything that has an ~intellect naturally desires always
769 1, 76 | Anima iii, 4) that the ~intellect is "separate," and that
770 1, 76 | and form. Therefore if the intellect were united ~to the body
771 1, 76 | it ~would follow that the intellect has a determinate nature;
772 1, 76 | contrary to the nature of the ~intellect. Therefore the intellect
773 1, 76 | intellect. Therefore the intellect is not united to the body
774 1, 76 | is not received into the intellect materially and ~individually,
775 1, 76 | universally: otherwise the ~intellect would not be capable of
776 1, 76 | the senses. Therefore ~the intellect is not united to the body
777 1, 76 | is the substance of ~the intellect the form of a body.~Aquin.:
778 1, 76 | We must assert that the intellect which is the principle ~
779 1, 76 | whether it be called the intellect or the ~intellectual soul,
780 1, 76 | follows therefore ~that the intellect by which Socrates understands
781 1, 76 | subject, in the possible intellect, and in ~the phantasms which
782 1, 76 | intelligible species the possible intellect is linked to the body of
783 1, 76 | fact, that the act of the intellect is the act of Socrates. ~
784 1, 76 | consider things relating to the intellect. ~For the relation of phantasms
785 1, 76 | relation of phantasms to the intellect is like the relation of ~
786 1, 76 | phantasms ~in the possible intellect. Now it is clear that because
787 1, 76 | phantasms are in the possible intellect, it does not follow that ~
788 1, 76 | tried to maintain that the intellect is united to the ~body as
789 1, 76 | motor; and hence that the intellect and body form one thing ~
790 1, 76 | so that the act of the intellect could be attributed to the
791 1, 76 | reasons. First, because the intellect does ~not move the body
792 1, 76 | presupposes the operation of the intellect. The reason therefore why ~
793 1, 76 | because he is moved by his intellect, but ~rather, contrariwise,
794 1, 76 | contrariwise, he is moved by his intellect because he ~understands.
795 1, 76 | matter and form, if the intellect be ~not the form, it follows
796 1, 76 | the essence, and then ~the intellect is the whole Socrates as
797 1, 76 | moved. ~Whereas the act of intellect remains in the agent, and
798 1, 76 | that he is ~moved by his intellect. Thirdly, because the action
799 1, 76 | sees. Therefore if the intellect and Socrates are united
800 1, 76 | manner, the action of the intellect cannot be attributed to
801 1, 76 | composed of a union of the intellect with ~whatever else belongs
802 1, 76 | Socrates, and still the intellect be united to ~those other
803 1, 76 | the very operation of the ~intellect it is made clear that the
804 1, 76 | This power is called the intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[76] A[
805 1, 76 | De Anima iii) that ~the intellect is separate, because it
806 1, 76 | things by means of ~his intellect, and that his intellect
807 1, 76 | intellect, and that his intellect may understand immaterial
808 1, 76 | bodies, but that there is one intellect in all ~men. For an immaterial
809 1, 76 | Therefore there is but one intellect in all men.~Aquin.: SMT
810 1, 76 | 1~OBJ 3: Further, if my intellect is distinct from your intellect,
811 1, 76 | intellect is distinct from your intellect, my ~intellect is an individual,
812 1, 76 | from your intellect, my ~intellect is an individual, and so
813 1, 76 | received individually ~into my intellect, and also into yours: which
814 1, 76 | contrary to the nature ~of the intellect which knows universals.~
815 1, 76 | thing understood is in the intellect which ~understands. If,
816 1, 76 | understands. If, therefore, my intellect is distinct from yours,
817 1, 76 | contrary to ~the nature of the intellect; for then the intellect
818 1, 76 | intellect; for then the intellect would seem not to be ~distinct
819 1, 76 | follow that there ~is one intellect in all men.~Aquin.: SMT
820 1, 76 | be, unless there is one intellect in both. ~Seemingly, therefore,
821 1, 76 | Seemingly, therefore, the intellect of the disciple and master
822 1, 76 | chiefly on account of the intellect. Therefore there ~is one
823 1, 76 | Therefore there ~is one intellect of all men.~Aquin.: SMT
824 1, 76 | absolutely impossible for one intellect to belong ~to all men. This
825 1, 76 | Plato maintained, man is the intellect ~itself. For it would follow
826 1, 76 | it is supposed that the intellect ~is a part or a power of
827 1, 76 | manner of the union of the intellect to this or that man. For
828 1, 76 | that no matter how the intellect is united or coupled to
829 1, 76 | to this or that ~man, the intellect has the precedence of all
830 1, 76 | sensitive powers obey the intellect, and are at ~its service.
831 1, 76 | sight. But if there is one intellect, no matter ~how diverse
832 1, 76 | those things of which the intellect makes use as ~instruments,
833 1, 76 | which is the act of the intellect, is not affected by any ~
834 1, 76 | any ~organ other than the intellect itself; it will further
835 1, 76 | a form of the ~possible intellect; since the same agent according
836 1, 76 | not a form of the possible intellect; it is the intelligible
837 1, 76 | that is a form. Now in one intellect, from ~different phantasms
838 1, 76 | abstracted; by which the intellect of that one man, by one ~
839 1, 76 | Therefore, if there were one intellect for all ~men, the diversity
840 1, 76 | maintain that there exists one intellect for all men.~Aquin.: SMT
841 1, 76 | point, whether there be one intellect or many; because, even ~
842 1, 76 | necessarily be an individual intellect, ~and the species whereby
843 1, 76 | Reply OBJ 4: Whether the intellect be one or many, what is
844 1, 76 | is understood is in the intellect, not according to its own ~
845 1, 76 | by a ~reflection of the intellect on itself: otherwise, the
846 1, 76 | of the body, namely the intellect and the ~will; whence these
847 1, 37 | in God, one by way of the intellect, which is ~the procession
848 1, 37 | the lover. As regards the intellect, however, words have been
849 1, 39 | things are ~named by our intellect, not as they really are
850 1, 39 | of the senses, whence the intellect derives its ~knowledge,
851 1, 39 | things which belong to ~the intellect are appropriated to the
852 1, 39 | Who proceeds by way of ~intellect, as Word. In another way
853 1, 39 | 1/10~I answer that, Our intellect, which is led to the knowledge
854 1, 39 | light and splendor of the intellect, as Damascene says (De Fide
855 1, 39 | truth" ~belongs to the intellect, as stated above (Q[16],
856 1, 39 | thing ~itself. Hence, as intellect and thing in their essential
857 1, 40 | that, Abstraction by the intellect is twofold - when the ~universal
858 1, 40 | circle is abstracted by the intellect from any sensible matter.
859 1, 40 | no longer remains in the ~intellect, but animal alone remains.
860 1, 40 | the matter remain in the intellect; ~as, for instance, if we
861 1, 40 | brass, there ~remains in our intellect separately the understanding
862 1, 40 | essence remains in ~the intellect if the properties are removed;
863 1, 41 | proceeds by mode of the intellect, as the Word. ~But every
864 1, 41 | which is the concept of ~the intellect; and the Holy Ghost proceeds
865 1, 41 | effects, and not as regards ~intellect and will, as stated above (
866 1, 41 | designate by different terms the intellect and the act of ~understanding
867 1, 42 | procession of the word ~from the intellect represents it more exactly;
868 1, 42 | its source except in an intellect passing from ~potentiality
869 1, 42 | according to nature and intellect. But in the divine ~persons
870 1, 42 | as a ~point; according to intellect, as the principle of demonstration;
871 1, 42 | word is not outside the ~intellect, inasmuch as it remains
872 1, 43 | to the perfection of the ~intellect are not gifts of sanctifying
873 1, 43 | proceeds as the word of ~the intellect, it seems unfitting for
874 1, 43 | namely, which belong to the intellect, and in respect ~of which
875 1, 43 | the illumination of the intellect and the kindling of the ~
876 1, 45 | instance, affinity, ~discord, intellect, or something of that kind.
877 1, 45 | ideas by force of the active intellect from the ~particular conditions;
878 1, 46 | the cause of things by His intellect and will, ~just as the craftsman
879 1, 46 | referred to the ~acts of intellect and will, as was said above (
880 1, 46 | proceeds as the word of the intellect; and the Holy Ghost proceeds
881 1, 46 | rational creatures, possessing intellect ~and will, there is found
882 1, 47 | everything which works by intellect works from some ~principle,
883 1, 47 | craftsmen. But God acts by ~intellect: therefore His work has
884 1, 47 | conclusion, except as ~to that intellect which deliberates in order
885 1, 47 | movement. Such is the human intellect, but not the ~divine intellect (
886 1, 47 | intellect, but not the ~divine intellect (Q[14], AA[7],12).~Aquin.:
887 1, 48 | together; ~and he said that the intellect distinguishes things by
888 1, 51 | secondly, what belongs to their intellect; thirdly, what ~belongs
889 1, 51 | produces the creature by His intellect and will (Q[14], A[8]; Q[
890 1, 51 | distinction between sense and intellect, ~thought that nothing existed
891 1, 51 | 3~But the very fact that intellect is above sense is a reasonable
892 1, 51 | things comprehensible by the intellect ~alone.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[
893 1, 51 | are distinguished by ~the intellect are really distinct. Now
894 1, 51 | incorporeal substance, ~the intellect apprehends that which distinguishes
895 1, 51 | individual forms ~which the intellect cannot apprehend as such.
896 1, 51 | things distinguished by the intellect are not necessarily ~distinguished
897 1, 51 | in reality; because the intellect does not apprehend things ~
898 1, 51 | things which are below our intellect exist in our intellect in
899 1, 51 | our intellect exist in our intellect in a simpler ~mode than
900 1, 51 | other ~hand, are above our intellect; and hence our intellect
901 1, 51 | intellect; and hence our intellect cannot attain to ~apprehend
902 1, 51 | conception; for, inasmuch as our intellect ~considers it as indeterminate,
903 1, 51 | the receptive mode of the intellect ~and of matter were the
904 1, 51 | something else. But the intellect does ~not receive the form
905 1, 51 | intelligible form is in the intellect ~according to the very nature
906 1, 51 | such is it so known by the ~intellect. Hence such a way of receiving
907 1, 51 | than another, and of keener intellect. Therefore the ~angels do
908 1, 55 | an active and a passive intellect?~(5) Is there in them any
909 1, 55 | of knowledge besides the intellect?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[
910 1, 55 | simpler than the active ~intellect of a soul. But the substance
911 1, 55 | substance of the active intellect is its own ~action; as is
912 1, 55 | that "the ~action of the intellect is life." But "since in
913 1, 55 | Therefore the action of the intellect is the essence of an angel
914 1, 55 | is. ~But in an angel the intellect and the object understood
915 1, 55 | understanding, which is between the intellect and the thing understood, ~
916 1, 55 | Reply OBJ 1: When the active intellect is said to be its own action, ~
917 1, 55 | cannot be said of the passive intellect, for this ~has no actions
918 1, 55 | says that "the act of the intellect is life."~Aquin.: SMT FP
919 1, 55 | essence. For, "mind" and ~"intellect" express the power of understanding.
920 1, 55 | OBJ 1: An angel is called "intellect" and "mind," because all
921 1, 55 | an active and a passive intellect in an angel?~Aquin.: SMT
922 1, 55 | an active and a passive ~intellect in an angel. The Philosopher
923 1, 55 | an active ~and a passive intellect in an angel.~Aquin.: SMT
924 1, 55 | function of the passive intellect is to ~receive; whereas
925 1, 55 | function of the active ~intellect, as is made clear in De
926 1, 55 | an active and a passive intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[
927 1, 55 | distinction of active and passive intellect in us ~is in relation to
928 1, 55 | compared to the passive ~intellect as colors to the sight;
929 1, 55 | sight; but to the active intellect as colors ~to the light,
930 1, 55 | is no active and passive intellect in the ~angel.~Aquin.: SMT
931 1, 55 | for admitting a passive intellect in us is ~derived from the
932 1, 55 | denominated the passive intellect. The necessity for admitting
933 1, 55 | for admitting an active ~intellect is due to this - that the
934 1, 55 | us is called the active intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[
935 1, 55 | an active and a passive intellect in ~them, except equivocally.~
936 1, 55 | an active ~and a passive intellect in them.~Aquin.: SMT FP
937 1, 55 | the function of the active intellect to enlighten, ~not another
938 1, 55 | enlighten, ~not another intellect, but things which are intelligible
939 1, 55 | belongs to the passive intellect to be in potentiality with
940 1, 55 | the notion of an active intellect: neither does it belong ~
941 1, 55 | it belong ~to the passive intellect for the angel to be enlightened
942 1, 55 | names of active ~and passive intellect, he will then be speaking
943 1, 55 | through ~bodily organs, as intellect and will: these are not
944 1, 55 | the ~soul's powers only intellect and will can belong to them.~
945 1, 55 | substances are divided into intellect and will. And it is in ~
946 1, 56 | are without matter, the intellect is the same as the object
947 1, 56 | medium through which the intellect understands, is ~compared
948 1, 56 | understands, is ~compared to the intellect understanding it as its
949 1, 56 | because the object of the intellect is universal being or universal ~
950 1, 56 | by his essence; and his ~intellect must be perfected by some
951 1, 56 | potentiality: so likewise the intellect in act ~is said to be the
952 1, 56 | that the substance of the ~intellect is itself the similitude
953 1, 56 | are without matter, the intellect is the same thing as ~the
954 1, 56 | understood," as to say that "the intellect in act is the thing understood
955 1, 56 | the light of the ~active intellect of the soul. But the light
956 1, 56 | the light of the active intellect ~abstracts intelligible
957 1, 56 | Further, the species in the intellect are indifferent to what
958 1, 56 | a form which is in the intellect by abstraction from matter
959 1, 56 | species of the angelic intellect are more or less universal.~
960 1, 56 | the more according as the intellect is lower.~Aquin.: SMT FP
961 1, 56 | comes of their weakness of intellect: while there are others
962 1, 56 | are others of stronger ~intellect, who can grasp many things
963 1, 56 | particulars, in so far as the intellect knowing it derives its knowledge ~
964 1, 56 | things. But if there be an intellect which does not derive its ~
965 1, 56 | the ~universal; for the intellect, which by one universal
966 1, 57 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the intellect is moved by the intelligible
967 1, 57 | OBJ 3: It belongs to the intellect, in so far as if is in ~
968 1, 57 | not happen ~in the angelic intellect, especially as regards the
969 1, 57 | Besides the action of the intellect is not of the ~same nature
970 1, 57 | text. 4), that if the human intellect ~were to have in itself
971 1, 57 | color. But as the human intellect is ~disposed for understanding
972 1, 57 | Therefore, since the angelic intellect ~has within itself some
973 1, 57 | because that whereby the intellect ~understands is something
974 1, 57 | is something within the intellect; whereas the Trinity alone ~
975 1, 57 | such angel ~existing in his intellect, which differs from the
976 1, 57 | but his species in the intellect of another angel ~is not
977 1, 57 | is infinitely above the intellect of an angel. But ~what is
978 1, 57 | not known by any created ~intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[56] A[
979 1, 57 | OBJ 2: Since an angel's intellect and essence are infinitely ~
980 1, 58 | do ~likewise. But man's intellect, which in the order of nature
981 1, 58 | species which he has in his ~intellect. And thus the intelligible
982 1, 58 | species which are in the intellect ~of an angel are perfections
983 1, 58 | and acts in regard to that intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[
984 1, 58 | the images of bodies. The intellect alone ~apprehends the essences
985 1, 58 | that the object of the intellect is "what a thing is," regarding ~
986 1, 58 | material things are in the ~intellect of man and angels, as the
987 1, 58 | But some things are ~in an intellect or in the soul according
988 1, 58 | connatural to him; just as our intellect has, by ~species which it
989 1, 58 | object ~singulars, but the intellect, universals." Now, in the
990 1, 58 | immaterial things by his intellect, and things singular and
991 1, 58 | knowledge, ~namely, the intellect, does not know. Hence Aristotle
992 1, 58 | Philosopher is speaking of our intellect, which ~apprehends only
993 1, 58 | the species in the angel's intellect, which are images ~drawn
994 1, 58 | of time. But ~the angel's intellect is above time; because,
995 1, 58 | angel, and every created intellect, fall far short of ~God'
996 1, 58 | be known by ~any created intellect.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[
997 1, 58 | 2: Although the angel's intellect is above that time according ~
998 1, 58 | succession in the angel's ~intellect, not all things that happen
999 1, 58 | Although the species in the intellect of an angel, in so ~far
1000 1, 58 | the same relation to the ~intellect as shapes do to bodies.
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3117 |