1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3086
Part, Question
1501 2, 49 | Philosopher, in the first species of quality.~Aquin.: SMT
1502 2, 49 | distinguish habit from the other species of quality, but from ~disposition.
1503 2, 49 | imperfect within the same ~species; and thus we call it a disposition,
1504 2, 49 | distinguished as diverse species of the one ~subaltern genus:
1505 2, 49 | qualities of the ~first species, which by reason of their
1506 2, 49 | disposition will not be the first species of quality.~Aquin.: SMT
1507 2, 49 | is put before power as a species of quality.~Aquin.: SMT
1508 2, 49 | to potentiality, or as to species," as we have said above (
1509 2, 50 | can only be in the third species of quality, which is divided ~
1510 2, 50 | dispositions of ~the first species are in the body: and held
1511 2, 50 | and held that the first species of ~quality belonged to
1512 2, 50 | they ~belonged to the first species of quality, but by way of
1513 2, 50 | the qualities of the first species, which are ~called habits
1514 2, 50 | dispositions which are in the first species of ~quality, as some maintained,
1515 2, 50 | from qualities of the third species, ~in this, that the qualities
1516 2, 50 | the qualities of the third species consist in some ~"becoming"
1517 2, 50 | then passed into the first ~species of quality. But Simplicius
1518 2, 50 | heating would be in the third species, and heat in the ~first
1519 2, 50 | and heat in the ~first species of quality; whereas Aristotle
1520 2, 50 | no ~diversity among the species of quality. And therefore
1521 2, 50 | habit belongs to the first species of quality, it is prior
1522 2, 50 | which belongs to the second species. Therefore habit is not
1523 2, 50 | singulars by the intelligible species, "then ~it is said to be
1524 2, 50 | intellect is the intelligible species, by means of ~which the
1525 2, 50 | does not act by ~means of species. Therefore the will is not
1526 2, 50 | the intellect there is a species which is the ~likeness of
1527 2, 50 | by means of intelligible species in regard to ~its proper
1528 2, 50 | is perfected by several ~species, and in so far as their
1529 2, 51 | disposition demanded by the human ~species, so that no man can be without
1530 2, 51 | they have ~intelligible species naturally impressed on them,
1531 2, 51 | through the intelligible species which he has received from ~
1532 2, 51 | power, some intelligible species, which ~are likenesses of
1533 2, 51 | two habits of the same ~species in the same man, one acquired,
1534 2, 51 | the two forms of the same species cannot be in the same ~subject.
1535 2, 52 | which a thing receives its species, must be something ~fixed
1536 2, 52 | is contained under the species, and whatever recedes from
1537 2, 52 | less, belongs to another species, more or less perfect. ~
1538 2, 52 | Metaph. viii, text. 10) that species of ~things are like numbers,
1539 2, 52 | subtraction changes the species. If, therefore, a form,
1540 2, 52 | things which receive their species from something to which
1541 2, 52 | they remain in the same species, on account of ~the oneness
1542 2, 52 | which they ~receive their species. For example, movement is
1543 2, 52 | yet it remains in the same species, on account of the ~oneness
1544 2, 52 | which a thing receives its species must ~remain indivisibly
1545 2, 52 | the participator has its species in respect of that ~form.
1546 2, 52 | can that which is in the ~species of substance," that is,
1547 2, 52 | we do ~not speak of the species of number as varying in
1548 2, 52 | more or less; ~because each species thereof is constituted by
1549 2, 52 | same is to be said of the species of continuous quantity,
1550 2, 52 | disposition do not give species to the ~subject: nor again
1551 2, 52 | notion ~of term, as do the species of numbers. Wherefore there
1552 2, 52 | qualities of the ~third species; but secondarily it may
1553 2, 52 | qualities of the first ~species: for, supposing an alteration
1554 2, 52 | subtraction would change the species; even as the ~species of
1555 2, 52 | the species; even as the ~species of color is changed when
1556 2, 52 | it follows: and yet the species remains ~the same on account
1557 2, 53 | contrary: since intelligible ~species are not contrary to one
1558 2, 53 | corrupting the intelligible species ~residing in the intellect:
1559 2, 53 | the proper abode of the species; for which reason it is
1560 2, 53 | evident ~that an intelligible species residing in the "possible"
1561 2, 53 | which is the cause of that ~species, have a contrary. Wherefore
1562 2, 53 | contrary to intelligible species, yet ~there can be a contrary
1563 2, 53 | it would follow that a ~species might be predicated of its
1564 2, 54 | determinate act of any species, as matter to form: because,
1565 2, 54 | to acts of a determinate ~species. Consequently several habits,
1566 2, 54 | natural things, diversity of species is ~according to the form,
1567 2, 54 | differ in genus differ in species, but not vice versa. Wherefore
1568 2, 54 | different powers differ in species: but it does not ~follow
1569 2, 54 | one genus, ~and several species be contained in one species;
1570 2, 54 | species be contained in one species; so does it happen that ~
1571 2, 54 | that ~there are several species of habits and powers.~Aquin.:
1572 2, 54 | For contraries differ in species. Now the same habit of science
1573 2, 54 | contrary, Acts differ in species according to the diversity
1574 2, 54 | agent ~produces its like in species. Habits, however, imply
1575 2, 54 | aspect, which may differ ~in species or even in genus. And though
1576 2, 54 | contrary habits are in one species: since contrariety of habits ~
1577 2, 54 | difference constituting the species of a habit; but some determinate ~
1578 2, 55 | called just. But justice is a species of virtue. It is ~therefore
1579 2, 55 | the virtue to a certain ~species, and here we are giving
1580 2, 56 | power is in the second species of quality. But virtue is ~
1581 2, 56 | not a part of prudence, as species is of a genus, ~as though
1582 2, 56 | regards the ~whole human species, such as Divine good, which
1583 2, 57 | understanding. Because a ~species is a kind of science, as
1584 2, 57 | moreover, subjective parts or species of ~prudence, e.g. domestic
1585 2, 60 | Q[54], A[2]). Again, the species of the object of appetite,
1586 2, 60 | necessity something in the species of fire. ~Sometimes, however,
1587 2, 60 | into matter are not of one species, ~but vary according to
1588 2, 60 | sun, animals of various species are produced by putrefaction ~
1589 2, 60 | reason belong to various species, according to their various
1590 2, 60 | moral virtues are of various species and ~are not one only.~Aquin.:
1591 2, 60 | agent: but it varies in species, on account of the various ~
1592 2, 60 | matters do not receive their species from the last ~end, but
1593 2, 60 | number, are not infinite in species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[60] A[
1594 2, 60 | distributive justice is of another species from commutative justice;
1595 2, 60 | are passions of different ~species, as stated above (Q[23],
1596 2, 60 | which do not diversify the species of ~passions, do not diversify
1597 2, 60 | passions, do not diversify the species of moral virtue: so that
1598 2, 60 | or less do not change a species. Now various ~objects of
1599 2, 60 | of pleasure belong to one species of ~virtue: and for the
1600 2, 60 | appetite, cause the different species ~of passions: while, according
1601 2, 60 | they cause ~the different species of virtues. Now the movement
1602 2, 60 | the individual or in the species, such as the pleasures of
1603 2, 60 | not cause a difference of species, unless ~they bear different
1604 2, 61 | genus is divided into its species, the ~members of the division
1605 2, 61 | their nature as things, one species may surpass ~another in
1606 2, 61 | another: since the different species of one genus ~do not qualify
1607 2, 62 | intellect requires intelligible species whereby to ~understand:
1608 2, 63 | habituation, is of the same species as ~infused virtue?~Aquin.:
1609 2, 63 | each thing derives its species from its form, and its individuation
1610 2, 63 | considered as part of his species, ~is to be referred, in
1611 2, 63 | good consists in "mode, species, and ~order," as Augustine
1612 2, 63 | habituation belongs to the same species as infused ~virtue?~Aquin.:
1613 2, 63 | virtue does not differ in species from ~acquired virtue. Because
1614 2, 63 | Therefore they do not differ in species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[63] A[
1615 2, 63 | God made, is of the same species as a man begotten ~naturally;
1616 2, 63 | virtue belong to the same species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[63] A[
1617 2, 63 | involves a difference of species. But the definition of ~
1618 2, 63 | apply, is not of the same species as infused virtue.~Aquin.:
1619 2, 63 | acquired temperance differ in ~species; and the same applies to
1620 2, 63 | horse's are not of the ~same species, on account of the difference
1621 2, 63 | consequently it was of the ~same species. It would be the same if
1622 2, 66 | to ~virtues of different species. In this sense it is clear
1623 2, 66 | to virtues of the ~same species. In this way, according
1624 2, 66 | Accordingly, a virtue takes its species from its object, as ~explained
1625 2, 66 | virtue considered in its species may be greater or ~less,
1626 2, 66 | individual, or in the one species, viz. in matters of food
1627 2, 66 | of a virtue, as to ~its species, is taken from its object.
1628 2, 66 | of a virtue, as to ~its species, is taken from its object.
1629 2, 67 | held that the ~intelligible species do not remain in the passive
1630 2, 67 | consideration ceases, ~the species are not preserved save in
1631 2, 67 | reason, ~because intelligible species are contained by the "possible"
1632 2, 67 | called "the abode of the species" (De Anima iii) because
1633 2, 67 | preserves the intelligible species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[67] A[
1634 2, 67 | applying the intelligible species to them as stated in the
1635 2, 67 | regards the intelligible species, ~which are in the "possible"
1636 2, 67 | virtues remain. ~Now the species are the quasi-formal element
1637 2, 67 | not as to the intelligible species, ~which are in the "possible"
1638 2, 67 | nature, and belongs to its species: even as lack of reason
1639 2, 67 | identically, cannot pass from one species to ~another, it follows
1640 2, 67 | imperfection be removed, the species ~of that thing is changed:
1641 2, 67 | difference are not the parts of a species, else ~they would not be
1642 2, 67 | not be predicated of the species. But even as the species ~
1643 2, 67 | species. But even as the species ~denotes the whole, i.e.
1644 2, 67 | that which is formal; the species, by signifying both. Thus,
1645 2, 70 | Things divided into different species, differ from one ~another.
1646 2, 70 | though divided into ~many species which are spoken of as so
1647 2, 70 | do not ~differ as various species of virtuous acts, but as
1648 2, 71 | which that thing derives its species. Now man derives his species ~
1649 2, 71 | species. Now man derives his species ~from his rational soul:
1650 2, 72 | 1~Whether sins differ in species according to their objects?~
1651 2, 72 | that sins do not differ in species, according to ~their objects.
1652 2, 72 | according ~to the different species of opposites. Now sin is
1653 2, 72 | Therefore sins do not differ ~in species according to their objects.~
1654 2, 72 | deeds, and desires differ in species according to their various ~
1655 2, 72 | Therefore sins, also differ in species according to their objects.~
1656 2, 72 | that a thing derives its species from that which is essential
1657 2, 72 | voluntary acts differ in species according to their objects,
1658 2, 72 | properly ~distinguished in species by their objects.~Aquin.:
1659 2, 72 | various things, differing in species or genus, nothing ~hinders
1660 2, 72 | aspect ~sin receives its species. It is thus that pride seeks
1661 2, 72 | A[1]), sins take their species from ~their objects. Now
1662 2, 72 | causes. For a thing takes its species from that whence it derives
1663 2, 72 | Therefore they take ~their species from them also. Therefore
1664 2, 72 | least ~reference to the species. Now the object in a sin
1665 2, 72 | sins would belong to one ~species, since they are due to one
1666 2, 72 | that ~there are various species of sins. Therefore sins
1667 2, 72 | matter and form, both ~in species and in genus. The "agent"
1668 2, 72 | acts; so that the different species of natural acts are taken
1669 2, 72 | motive principle, diverse species of sins can proceed: thus
1670 2, 72 | that human acts take their species from the end.~Aquin.: SMT
1671 2, 72 | derives both its being and its species from the end.~Aquin.: SMT
1672 2, 72 | that they ~give the act its species. Nevertheless, even considered
1673 2, 72 | which movement takes ~its species (Phys. v, text. 4; Ethic.
1674 2, 72 | given, not as distinct ~species of sins, but to show their
1675 2, 72 | according to which the species of sins are diversified:
1676 2, 72 | properly one of different ~species of sins: because the virtues
1677 2, 72 | punishment ~diversifies their species?~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
1678 2, 72 | punishment diversifies their species; for instance, when sin
1679 2, 72 | cannot belong to the same species, nor even to the same genus.
1680 2, 72 | said to belong to the same species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
1681 2, 72 | mortal in virtue of their species [*"Ex ~genere," genus in
1682 2, 72 | in this case denoting the species], as murder and ~adultery;
1683 2, 72 | venial in virtue of their species, as in an idle ~word, and
1684 2, 72 | things that constitute a species are prior to the ~species,
1685 2, 72 | species are prior to the ~species, e.g. specific differences.
1686 2, 72 | causes the diversity of species, and is not to be ~found
1687 2, 72 | found save in different species, e.g. "rational" and "irrational," ~"
1688 2, 72 | be found within the same species; thus "white" and "black"
1689 2, 72 | is found within the ~one species of man.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[
1690 2, 72 | accidental never ~constitutes a species; and what is outside the
1691 2, 72 | nothing hinders the same species from ~including mortal and
1692 2, 72 | sins; for instance, in the species "adultery" ~the first movement
1693 2, 72 | mortal by reason of its ~species, and another venial by reason
1694 2, 72 | venial by reason of its species, it follows that ~this difference
1695 2, 72 | even in ~things of the same species, as stated above.~Aquin.:
1696 2, 72 | one another as different species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
1697 2, 72 | negation cannot be in the same species, ~since negation has no
1698 2, 72 | since negation has no species; for "there is neither species
1699 2, 72 | species; for "there is neither species nor ~difference of non-being,"
1700 2, 72 | cannot belong to the same species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
1701 2, 72 | commission are found in the same species ~of sin. For the covetous
1702 2, 72 | observed in the natural species of the sinful act; while
1703 2, 72 | nevertheless ~formally in the same species of sin, because they are
1704 2, 72 | stabbing come under the one ~species of murder, although the
1705 2, 72 | according to the natural species. Accordingly, if we refer
1706 2, 72 | we refer to the ~material species in sins of omission and
1707 2, 72 | differ ~specifically, using species in a broad sense, in so
1708 2, 72 | and ~privation may have a species. But if we refer to the
1709 2, 72 | if we refer to the formal species of ~sins of omission and
1710 2, 72 | according to different formal species, but only according to material ~
1711 2, 72 | only according to material ~species, as stated.~Aquin.: SMT
1712 2, 72 | opposed to sins of different ~species. Moreover sin is not specified
1713 2, 72 | speaking, negation is ~not in a species, yet it is allotted to a
1714 2, 72 | yet it is allotted to a species by reduction to the ~affirmation
1715 2, 72 | when each ~has the complete species; thus a horse and an ox
1716 2, 72 | secondly, when the diversity of species is derived from diversity
1717 2, 72 | the walls are incomplete species, as the Philosopher ~declares (
1718 2, 72 | as into various complete species: for the ~consummation of
1719 2, 72 | deed have the ~complete species; but the first beginning
1720 2, 72 | belong to the one complete ~species of sin, since they proceed
1721 2, 72 | following ~the complete species of sin, even as boyhood
1722 2, 72 | deficiency diversify the species of sins?~Aquin.: SMT FS
1723 2, 72 | deficiency do not diversify the ~species of sins. For excess and
1724 2, 72 | less" do not diversify a species. Therefore excess ~and deficiency
1725 2, 72 | deficiency do not diversify the species of sins.~Aquin.: SMT FS
1726 2, 72 | of the reality. Now the species of ~falsehood is not diversified
1727 2, 72 | Therefore neither is the species of sin diversified by straying
1728 2, 72 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, "one species cannot be made out of two,"
1729 2, 72 | deficiency do not diversify the species of ~sins.~Aquin.: SMT FS
1730 2, 72 | and the Divine law, the species of sin is gathered, not
1731 2, 72 | there will be ~a different species of sin. Now it is evident
1732 2, 72 | not cause diversity of ~species, yet they are sometimes
1733 2, 72 | that there are no different species of friendship, ~by reason
1734 2, 72 | results a corresponding species of sin.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[
1735 2, 72 | acts sometimes take their ~species from circumstances, as stated
1736 2, 72 | OBJ 3: Further, diverse species are assigned to gluttony,
1737 2, 72 | the others. Therefore the ~species of sin is diversified according
1738 2, 72 | circumstances. Therefore the species of sins ~are not diversified
1739 2, 72 | sinning, there is a different species of sin, because the ~motive
1740 2, 72 | circumstances does not diversify the species of sins, but belongs to
1741 2, 72 | belongs to one ~and the same species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[
1742 2, 72 | circumstances entails different ~species of sins.~Aquin.: SMT FS
1743 2, 72 | and so it has different ~species in respect of the thing
1744 2, 72 | But sin does not take its species from the privation or ~aversion,
1745 2, 72 | transfers an act from one species to ~another, save when there
1746 2, 72 | Reply OBJ 3: In the various species of gluttony there are various ~
1747 2, 73 | good whence it derives ~its species. Now these goods, to which
1748 2, 73 | vices and sins take their species from that to which they ~
1749 2, 73 | which completes a sin's ~species, sins are not connected
1750 2, 73 | excellence according to its ~species; and again, one man is more
1751 2, 73 | than another, in the same ~species of virtue, as stated above (
1752 2, 73 | contrary, Sins take their species from their objects, as was ~
1753 2, 73 | others in ~respect of their species, as murder is graver than
1754 2, 73 | forasmuch as sins take their species from their ~objects, the
1755 2, 73 | foremost, as resulting from the species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[73] A[
1756 2, 73 | sin and virtue take their ~species from the object, as shown
1757 2, 73 | takes its gravity from its species. Now a circumstance does ~
1758 2, 73 | it ~causes, of itself, a species of evil; and if it is not
1759 2, 73 | which does not give the ~species, may aggravate a sin; because,
1760 2, 73 | only in reference to its species, but also in reference to ~
1761 2, 73 | not only according to ~the species of that act, but also according
1762 2, 73 | it constitutes the sin's species; because ~it may multiply
1763 2, 73 | of evil within the same species, as stated ~above. And if
1764 2, 73 | in a manner, to the very species of that ~sin: for instance,
1765 2, 76 | accidental does not give the species. Therefore nothing that ~
1766 2, 76 | circumstance ~constituting another species of sin); or, suppose that
1767 2, 76 | may have reference to a species of the ~sin of ingratitude,
1768 2, 77 | the preservation of the species, ~such as sexual matters:
1769 2, 78 | from habits are of like species as the acts ~from which
1770 2, 79 | evil and sinful in their species, as ~was shown above (Q[
1771 2, 79 | to it in respect of its species. If therefore God ~caused
1772 2, 79 | habits do not take ~their species from the privation itself,
1773 2, 79 | from God, belongs to the species ~of the act consequently,
1774 2, 80 | the devil cannot ~impress species on the human intellect,
1775 2, 80 | him ~to produce imaginary species, since imaginary forms,
1776 2, 80 | preserved by means of sensible ~species, and continue to move the
1777 2, 81 | that "by sharing the same species, many men are one man." ~
1778 2, 81 | a man begets his like in species but ~not in individual.
1779 2, 81 | concern the nature of ~the species, are transmitted by parents
1780 2, 82 | inordinate ~disposition, unity of species depends on the cause, while
1781 2, 82 | bodily sickness: ~various species of sickness proceed from
1782 2, 82 | different men, it is one in species and ~in proportion, but
1783 2, 82 | that, Everything takes its species from its form: and it has ~
1784 2, 82 | been stated (A[2]) that the species of original sin is taken
1785 2, 82 | even sickness of the same species, ~has not an equal cause
1786 2, 83 | far as the concupiscible species is ~seen through the sight.
1787 2, 84 | because it is the first species of pride. For it ~is characteristic
1788 2, 84 | in respect of the other species of pride.~Aquin.: SMT FS
1789 2, 84 | the privation of mode, species and order." But in so far
1790 2, 84 | the preservation of the species, e.g. ~sexual intercourse,
1791 2, 85 | Whether privation of mode, species and order is an effect of
1792 2, 85 | Whether privation of mode, species and order is the effect
1793 2, 85 | that privation of mode, species and order is not ~the effect
1794 2, 85 | it does not destroy mode, species ~and order.~Aquin.: SMT
1795 2, 85 | the ~"privation of mode, species and order," as Augustine
1796 2, 85 | Therefore privation of mode, species and order is not the ~effect
1797 2, 85 | different sins. Now since ~mode, species and order are diverse, their
1798 2, 85 | Therefore privation of mode, species and order is not the effect
1799 2, 85 | deprives the body of mode, species and order.~Aquin.: SMT FS
1800 2, 85 | the FP, Q[5], A[5], mode, species and order ~are consequent
1801 2, 85 | from which it derives its "species." Again, any kind of form,
1802 2, 85 | different grades of mode, species and order, ~corresponding
1803 2, 85 | which good has its mode, ~species and order, and is neither
1804 2, 85 | which also has its mode, ~species and order; and this is diminished
1805 2, 85 | this too has its mode, species and order, and is entirely ~
1806 2, 85 | which also has its mode, species and order, the privation
1807 2, 85 | sin is privation of ~mode, species and order, and how it destroys
1808 2, 85 | destroys or diminishes mode, species ~and order.~Aquin.: SMT
1809 2, 85 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Mode, species and order follow one from
1810 2, 87 | Because punishment is a species of evil, as stated in ~the
1811 2, 88 | division of a genus into its species which have an equal share
1812 2, 88 | according as the genus or species of an act ~is determined
1813 2, 88 | disposes to something of like species, wherefore ~it is stated
1814 2, 88 | sin differ in genus or ~species, as stated above (A[2]).
1815 2, 88 | disposes ~to an act of like species. In this way, a sin generically
1816 2, 88 | mortal, ~for they differ in species. Nevertheless, in this same
1817 2, 88 | another, as though they were species of one genus, as stated
1818 2, 88 | is not like mortal sin in species; but it is in ~genus, inasmuch
1819 2, 88 | imperfect ~thing in the same species; thus imperfect science,
1820 2, 88 | circumstance, and constitutes the species of the moral act. ~This
1821 2, 88 | circumstance constitutes a new species of sin known as adultery.~
1822 2, 88 | the deformity of another species. For it ~has been stated
1823 2, 88 | transfers the sin to another species, and becomes, as it were,
1824 2, 88 | draws a sin to ~another species, nor is frequency or custom,
1825 2, 88 | action does not acquire a new species ~through being repeated
1826 2, 88 | prolonged act to change its species, e.g. ~disobedience, contempt,
1827 2, 88 | unless ~it constitute the species of a sin, as we have stated
1828 2, 88 | since a moral act takes its species from deliberate reason, ~
1829 2, 88 | by such a subtraction the species of the act is ~destroyed.~
1830 2, 89 | not transfer it to another species, unless ~there be an additional
1831 2, 90 | as to a ~common genus or species, but as to a common final
1832 2, 91 | and imperfect in the same species, e.g. a boy ~and a man:
1833 2, 91 | preservation of nature in the species ~or in the individual. And
1834 2, 94 | considered in ~their proper species. If then we speak of acts
1835 2, 94 | themselves, ~i.e. in their proper species, thus not all virtuous acts
1836 2, 96 | 1/1~I answer that, The species of virtues are distinguished
1837 2, 100 | the ~common good of the species; hence precepts bearing
1838 2, 102 | the sin, the lower the ~species of animals offered for it.
1839 2, 102 | mingling of animals of divers species, the literal reason may ~
1840 2, 102 | Because animals of different species ~do not easily breed, unless
1841 2, 105 | the point of view of the species, by means of generation, ~
1842 2, 107 | that ~movements differ in species through being directed to
1843 2, 107 | thus a genus contains its species, and a seed contains the
1844 2, 110 | clearly not in the ~"fourth" species of quality; viz. "form"
1845 2, 110 | Nor is it in the "second" species, which is ~"natural power"
1846 2, 110 | must be in the ~"first" species which is "habit" or "disposition."
1847 2, 110 | is reduced to the first species of quality; and yet ~it
1848 2, 110 | of grace, as being in the species ~of intellectual or rational
1849 2, 110 | soul is not classed in a ~species by any of its powers, since
1850 2, 110 | soul following upon the species. Hence the soul differs
1851 2, 110 | inasmuch as it is of such a species.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[110] A[
1852 2, 110 | properties ~following upon the species, the soul cannot be without
1853 2, 110 | intellectual or ~rational in its species, not that it would actually
1854 2, 110 | of the essence of such a species, from which these powers ~
1855 2, 111 | that ~there are infinite species of grace. Now no art takes
1856 2, 111 | to some of a ~determinate species, and moreover all coincide
1857 2, 111 | heat, ~which manifests its species whereby it produces heat
1858 2, 112 | Nothing can act beyond its species, since the cause must ~always
1859 2, 113 | as every movement has its species from its term. Nevertheless, ~
1860 2, 113 | division of a genus into its ~species, in which the things enumerated
1861 2, 113 | considers ~the intelligible species, as stated above (FP, Q[
1862 2, 114 | nothing acts beyond its species. But the principle of ~merit
1863 2, 2 | should not be reckoned as a species of that act.~Aquin.: SMT
1864 2, 4 | each ~thing derives its species from its form. When therefore
1865 2, 4 | division, as ~different species of virtue (1 Cor. 13:13).
1866 2, 4 | voluntary acts take their species from their end which ~is
1867 2, 4 | which gives a thing its species, is after ~the manner of
1868 2, 4 | both because it takes its species therefrom, and because the
1869 2, 4 | to be reduced to various species in a certain ~order, as
1870 2, 4 | lifeless faith are the same species, as ~stated above (A[4]).
1871 2, 4 | they belonged to different species. But they differ as perfect
1872 2, 4 | imperfect within the same species. Hence lifeless faith, being
1873 2, 4 | other ~habit, takes its species from the formal aspect of
1874 2, 5 | reason of this is that the species of every habit depends on
1875 2, 5 | object, without which the species of the habit ~cannot remain.
1876 2, 6 | sometimes essential to the species, whereas sometimes it is ~
1877 2, 6 | possessed of its proper species: ~thus privation of the
1878 2, 6 | humors is essential to the ~species of sickness, while darkness
1879 2, 6 | existing in its ~proper species, it follows that what is
1880 2, 6 | as being essential to its species. For we cannot assign as
1881 2, 6 | is not essential to the species of faith, ~since faith is
1882 2, 6 | is essential to the act's species, ~considered as a moral
1883 2, 7 | Again, acts take their species ~from the object, according
1884 2, 10 | unbelievers is a sin?~(5) Of the species of unbelief;~(6) Of their
1885 2, 10 | Whether there are several species of unbelief?~Aquin.: SMT
1886 2, 10 | that there are not several species of unbelief. ~For, since
1887 2, 10 | Therefore there are not several species of unbelief, ~according
1888 2, 10 | If therefore the various species of unbelief ~correspond
1889 2, 10 | is an infinite number of species of unbelief, and consequently, ~
1890 2, 10 | ought not to make these species the object of our consideration.~
1891 2, 10 | not belong to different species. Now ~a man may be an unbeliever
1892 2, 10 | not make a diversity of species ~of unbelief: and so there
1893 2, 10 | so there are not several species of unbelief.~Aquin.: SMT
1894 2, 10 | On the contrary, Several species of vice are opposed to each
1895 2, 10 | virtue. Therefore several species of vice are opposed to it.~
1896 2, 10 | way there are determinate species of vices ~contrary to a
1897 2, 10 | faith, there are several species of unbelief, determinate
1898 2, 10 | way, reckon these three as species of unbelief.~Aquin.: SMT
1899 2, 10 | Para. 3/3~If, however, the species of unbelief be distinguished
1900 2, 10 | there are not determinate ~species of unbelief: for errors
1901 2, 10 | determines ~the various species of that sin. Secondly, it
1902 2, 10 | however does not derive its species from this point of ~view,
1903 2, 10 | unbelief derives its various species. Hence, even as charity ~
1904 2, 10 | while there are various ~species of vice opposed to charity,
1905 2, 10 | Truth, yet there are many species of unbelief, because ~unbelievers
1906 2, 10 | argument considers the various species of unbelief ~according to
1907 2, 10 | man from erring in various species of unbelief, even as one
1908 2, 11 | 1/1~Whether heresy is a species of unbelief?~Aquin.: SMT
1909 2, 11 | seem that heresy is not a species of unbelief. For ~unbelief
1910 2, 11 | Therefore heresy is not a ~species of unbelief.~Aquin.: SMT
1911 2, 11 | Further, vice takes its species chiefly from its end; hence
1912 2, 11 | Therefore heresy is a species of pride rather than ~of
1913 2, 11 | Therefore ~heresy is not a species of unbelief.~Aquin.: SMT
1914 2, 11 | and consequently it is a species ~of unbelief.~Aquin.: SMT
1915 2, 11 | end. This belongs to the species of unbelief in pagans and ~
1916 2, 11 | 4~Therefore heresy is a species of unbelief, belonging to
1917 2, 11 | OBJ 2: Vices take their species from their proximate end,
1918 2, 11 | sake of theft, there is the species of ~adultery taken from
1919 2, 11 | effect under its cause, or a species under its genus, as ~appears
1920 2, 11 | from this it derives its ~species, while its remote end reveals
1921 2, 12 | unbelief, is a determinate ~species of unbelief. If then, apostasy
1922 2, 12 | that it is a determinate species of unbelief, which does
1923 2, 12 | Para. 1/1 ~Reply OBJ 3: The species of a quality or form are
1924 2, 12 | movement that takes its species from the terms. Now ~apostasy
1925 2, 12 | way ~divided into three species: since to affirm unfitting
1926 2, 12 | does not cause distinct species of habits, since the ~falsehood
1927 2, 13 | certain malice?~(2) Of the species of this sin;~(3) Whether
1928 2, 13 | having its own determinate species: whereas sin committed through
1929 2, 13 | the second, it is not a species of ~sin, because final impenitence
1930 2, 13 | time do not diversify ~the species of virtues or vices, since
1931 2, 13 | not be reckoned as two ~species of sin against the Holy
1932 2, 13 | Therefore it seems that the ~species of sins against the Holy
1933 2, 13 | I answer that, The above species are fittingly assigned to
1934 2, 13 | to impenitence which is a species of the sin against the Holy ~
1935 2, 14 | since it ~pertains to the species of the rational soul, is
1936 2, 16 | to longanimity which is a species of ~fortitude. Since, then,
1937 2, 17 | If what gives a thing its species be removed, the species ~
1938 2, 17 | species be removed, the species ~is destroyed, and that
1939 2, 17 | specifically. ~Now hope takes its species from its principal object,
1940 2, 18 | habits take their name and species from their ~objects. Now
1941 2, 18 | charity belongs to ~its very species.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[19] A[
1942 2, 18 | does not belong to the species of servile fear, ~even as
1943 2, 18 | does lifelessness to the species of lifeless faith. For ~
1944 2, 18 | lifeless faith. For ~the species of a moral habit or act
1945 2, 18 | who has ~charity. For the species of a habit is not destroyed
1946 2, 19 | respect of their ~proper species, they are more grievous.
1947 2, 20 | presumption, which is ~reckoned a species of sin against the Holy
1948 2, 20 | contrary, It is reckoned a species of sin against the Holy
1949 2, 22 | but considered as to its species, an accident which ~results
1950 2, 22 | Philosopher reckons several species of friendship (Ethic. viii,
1951 2, 22 | into a number of ~various species.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[23] A[
1952 2, 22 | for God. Now the different species of friendship are ~differentiated,
1953 2, 22 | this way there are three species of friendship, namely friendship
1954 2, 22 | based; thus ~there is one species of friendship between kinsmen,
1955 2, 22 | not divided into ~several species.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[23] A[
1956 2, 22 | virtues are of the same species as charity: nor is it the ~
1957 2, 24 | their acts be of different ~species. For every act of the one
1958 2, 24 | For every act of the one species belongs to the same habit.
1959 2, 24 | same habit. Now ~since the species of an act is derived from
1960 2, 24 | even by reason of its own species, is ~capable of reflecting
1961 2, 24 | belong with us to a common species. Therefore we are not bound
1962 2, 24 | united to us in a ~common species, but also one who is united
1963 2, 25 | its object it takes its species, while, from the ~power
1964 2, 25 | thus movement has ~its species from the term to which it
1965 2, 25 | Accordingly love takes its species from its object, but its ~
1966 2, 25 | happiness. And this regards the species of love; for ~there are
1967 2, 25 | for ~there are different species of love according to the
1968 2, 26 | of good consists in mode, species and order, as Augustine ~
1969 2, 29 | not divided into several species: whereas ~there would seem
1970 2, 34 | Orth. ii, 14) calls envy a species ~of sorrow, and says that "
1971 2, 37 | the physical order, the species ~is not constituted by that
1972 2, 37 | first, according to the species of that sin, secondly, according
1973 2, 37 | genus. Now ~the genus or species of a sin is taken from its
1974 2, 41 | seem ~to constitute the species of a sin. Therefore scandal
1975 2, 41 | special sin, ~because a species is not constituted by that
1976 2, 41 | moral ~actions take their species from their end, as stated
1977 2, 41 | Scandal does not derive the species of a special sin from ~the
1978 2, 45 | private good is the same in ~species as that which regards the
1979 2, 45 | acts and habits take their species from their ~objects, as
1980 2, 45 | genus from ~containing a species which is operative in every
1981 2, 45 | operative in every other species of that ~same genus, even
1982 2, 45 | habit is not diversified in species or essence by ~things which
1983 2, 45 | Q[54], A[2], ad 1), the species of ~habits differ according
1984 2, 45 | A[1]), wherefore the species of habits differ by their
1985 2, 45 | must ~needs be different species of prudence corresponding
1986 2, 45 | the ~other, diversify the species of a habit, thus for instance,
1987 2, 45 | all the animals of a same species act in ~like manner. But
1988 2, 46 | a virtue are its various species. In this way ~the parts
1989 2, 46 | is divided into various species ~according to the various
1990 2, 48 | remains for us to discuss the species of ~prudence whereby a multitude
1991 2, 48 | of inquiry:~(1) Whether a species of prudence is regnative?~(
1992 2, 48 | 3) domestic economy are species of prudence?~(4) Whether
1993 2, 48 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether a species of prudence is regnative?~
1994 2, 48 | should not be reckoned a species of ~prudence. For regnative
1995 2, 48 | regnum] is one of six species of government. But no species
1996 2, 48 | species of government. But no species of prudence ~is ascribed
1997 2, 48 | neither should a ~regnative species be ascribed to a kingdom.~
1998 2, 48 | kingdom: for which ~reason a species of prudence is reckoned
1999 2, 48 | prudence is reckoned a species of prudence which is directive,
2000 2, 48 | viii, 10: wherefore the species of prudence should be denominated ~
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3086 |