1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3079
Part, Question
2001 3, 3 | union took place in the Person, and not in the nature.
2002 3, 3 | properly befitting to a Person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[1]
2003 3, 3 | OBJ 1: Since the Divine Person is infinite, no addition
2004 3, 3 | 1~Reply OBJ 2: A Divine Person is said to be incommunicable
2005 3, 3 | being predicated of the Person. Hence it is not contrary
2006 3, 3 | contrary to the ~nature of person to be communicated so as
2007 3, 3 | for even in a created person several natures may concur
2008 3, 3 | accidentally, as ~in the person of one man we find quantity
2009 3, 3 | this is proper ~to a Divine Person, on account of its infinity,
2010 3, 3 | nature ~constitutes a Divine Person, not simply, but forasmuch
2011 3, 3 | simply, but forasmuch as the Person is ~denominated from such
2012 3, 3 | Divine Nature that a Divine Person is constituted simply. Hence ~
2013 3, 3 | simply. Hence ~the Divine Person is not said to assume the
2014 3, 3 | act. But to act befits a person, not a ~nature, which is
2015 3, 3 | itself, ~but by reason of the Person in Whom It is considered
2016 3, 3 | considered to be. Hence a ~Person is primarily and more properly
2017 3, 3 | assumed a nature to Its Person. And after the ~same manner
2018 3, 3 | distinct suppositum from the Person of the ~Word. Hence, inasmuch
2019 3, 3 | took human nature to the ~Person of the Word, It is said
2020 3, 3 | takes human nature to the Person of the Word, He did not
2021 3, 3 | belongs to It by reason of the Person of the Word, as was said ~
2022 3, 3 | it is befitting to that Person alone.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
2023 3, 3 | assume by reason of the Person. But what belongs to one
2024 3, 3 | nature, but only in the ~Person. Therefore, if the Personality
2025 3, 3 | subsisting, and consequently a Person, since it is an ~intellectual
2026 3, 3 | Nature as subsisting and as a Person. And in this way It may
2027 3, 3 | it is terminated in the Person of the ~Word.~Aquin.: SMT
2028 3, 3 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether one Person without another can assume
2029 3, 3 | It would seem that one Person cannot assume a created
2030 3, 3 | Further, as we say the Person of the Son became incarnate,
2031 3, 3 | term of the assumption is a Person, as stated above ~(A[2]).
2032 3, 3 | of term belongs to one ~Person in such a manner as not
2033 3, 3 | to be united to the one Person of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT
2034 3, 3 | without the term, which is a ~Person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[4]
2035 3, 3 | assume by reason ~of the Person in Whom the union is terminated,
2036 3, 3 | the ~Divine Nature of the Person incarnate, as Damascene
2037 3, 3 | seem that no other Divine Person could have assumed ~human
2038 3, 3 | human nature except the Person of the Son. For by this
2039 3, 3 | it seems that no ~other Person except the Person of the
2040 3, 3 | other Person except the Person of the Son could have become
2041 3, 3 | Therefore at least the Person of the ~Father cannot become
2042 3, 3 | power, and the term is a ~Person. But the Divine power is
2043 3, 3 | united human nature to the Person of the Father or of the
2044 3, 3 | as It united it to the Person of the Son. And hence we
2045 3, 3 | does not constitute His Person, as does the eternal Sonship;
2046 3, 3 | man," which signifies one person; and hence the ~distinction
2047 3, 3 | terminated in the unity of Person, as ~has been said above (
2048 3, 3 | Holy Ghost are not ~one Person. Therefore the three Persons
2049 3, 3 | contrary, The Incarnate Person subsists in two natures.
2050 3, 3 | in Christ neither a new person is made nor a new ~hypostasis,
2051 3, 3 | is assumed to the Divine Person or ~hypostasis, which, indeed,
2052 3, 3 | the power of the Divine Person. Now such is the ~characteristic
2053 3, 3 | nature, but only in the same Person. ~Hence, since in the mystery
2054 3, 3 | the quality of the Divine ~Person assuming, and not according
2055 3, 3 | one human hypostasis or person; thus Anselm says in the
2056 3, 3 | the same man to unity of Person."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[
2057 3, 3 | would "one" imply unity of person, but unity in human nature;
2058 3, 3 | unity, not indeed of one Person, but to the unity of each
2059 3, 3 | but to the unity of each Person, so ~that even as the Divine
2060 3, 3 | natural unity with each Person, so ~also the human nature
2061 3, 3 | would have a unity with each Person by assumption.~Aquin.: SMT
2062 3, 3 | can be predicated of the Person subsisting in that ~nature,
2063 3, 3 | this ~hypothesis, of the Person of the Father may be predicated
2064 3, 3 | Divine; and likewise of the ~Person of the Son and of the Holy
2065 3, 3 | But what belongs to the Person ~of the Father by reason
2066 3, 3 | Father by reason of His own Person could not be attributed
2067 3, 3 | not be attributed to the ~Person of the Son or Holy Ghost
2068 3, 3 | as "man" stood for ~the Person of the Father. But if one
2069 3, 3 | 1/1~Whether one Divine Person can assume two human natures?~
2070 3, 3 | would seem that one Divine Person cannot assume two human ~
2071 3, 3 | suppositum of the Divine Person, as is plain ~from what
2072 3, 3 | Therefore, if we suppose ~one Person to assume two human natures,
2073 3, 3 | be said that the Divine ~Person incarnate was one man, seeing
2074 3, 3 | possibly for one Divine Person to assume two human natures.~
2075 3, 3 | Now the power of a Divine Person is infinite, nor can it ~
2076 3, 3 | not be said that a Divine ~Person so assumed one human nature
2077 3, 3 | we consider the Divine Person in regard to His power,
2078 3, 3 | be said that the Divine Person, over and ~beyond the human
2079 3, 3 | And hence, if the Divine Person were to ~assume two human
2080 3, 3 | relation ~to the one Divine Person, but the Divine Nature is
2081 3, 3 | is related to the Divine Person, inasmuch as it is assumed ~
2082 3, 3 | is assumed ~by the Divine Person in time, not indeed that
2083 3, 3 | indeed that the nature is the Person, ~but that the Person of
2084 3, 3 | the Person, ~but that the Person of God subsists in human
2085 3, 3 | be assumed by the Divine Person, the Divine Nature must ~
2086 3, 3 | relation to the Divine Person, nor would one assume the
2087 3, 3 | was more fitting that the Person of the Son rather than any ~
2088 3, 3 | rather than any ~other Divine Person should assume human nature?~
2089 3, 3 | to the truth." But by the Person of the Son ~of God becoming
2090 3, 3 | they referred to the very Person of the Son what ~was said
2091 3, 3 | would not have arisen if the Person of the Father ~had become
2092 3, 3 | it seems fitting that the Person of the Father, ~rather than
2093 3, 3 | Father, ~rather than the Person of the Son, should have
2094 3, 3 | Therefore it ~became the Person of the Holy Ghost rather
2095 3, 3 | Holy Ghost rather than the Person of the Son to ~become incarnate.~
2096 3, 3 | it was fitting that the Person of ~the Son should become
2097 3, 3 | was most fitting that the Person of the Son should ~become
2098 3, 3 | fittingly united. Now the Person of the Son, Who is the Word ~
2099 3, 3 | goodness?" Hence, even if the Person of the Father had ~become
2100 3, 4 | 2) Whether He assumed a person?~(3) Whether He assumed
2101 3, 4 | Incarnation of the Divine Person, as above stated (Q[3],
2102 3, 4 | being ~assumed by a Divine Person, and this capability cannot
2103 3, 4 | to the unity of a Divine Person, unless their ~personality
2104 3, 4 | to ~Himself in unity of Person, and in this way nothing
2105 3, 4 | not the perfection of one ~person or suppositum, but of something
2106 3, 4 | the Son of God assumed a person? ~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[
2107 3, 4 | the Son of God assumed a person. For Damascene ~says (De
2108 3, 4 | in rational nature ~is a person, as is plain from Boethius (
2109 3, 4 | the Son ~of God assumed a person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[2]
2110 3, 4 | the Son of God assumed a person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[2]
2111 3, 4 | in a Decretal that "the ~Person of God absorbed the person
2112 3, 4 | Person of God absorbed the person of man." Therefore it would
2113 3, 4 | it would seem that ~the person of man existed previous
2114 3, 4 | assumed the nature, not the person, of man."~Aquin.: SMT TP
2115 3, 4 | presupposed to the motion. Now a ~person in human nature is not presupposed
2116 3, 4 | nowise assumed a ~human person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[2]
2117 3, 4 | uncreated suppositum, the Person ~of the Son of God. Hence
2118 3, 4 | it does not follow that a person was assumed.~Aquin.: SMT
2119 3, 4 | the union with a Divine Person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[4] A[2]
2120 3, 4 | been assumed by a Divine Person, the human ~nature would
2121 3, 4 | although improperly, that the Person "absorbed the person," inasmuch
2122 3, 4 | the Person "absorbed the person," inasmuch as ~the Divine
2123 3, 4 | inasmuch as ~the Divine Person by His union hindered the
2124 3, 4 | 1/1~Whether the Divine Person assumed a man?~Aquin.: SMT
2125 3, 4 | would seem that the Divine Person assumed a man. For it is ~
2126 3, 4 | none other than the Divine Person, Who is the term of the ~
2127 3, 4 | assumption is terminated in a Person, and it is contrary to ~
2128 3, 4 | thus individualized in a person. ~Secondly, because to a
2129 3, 4 | assumed nature, except ~the Person assuming, as was said above (
2130 3, 4 | human nature, which is the Person assuming. Secondly, ~because
2131 3, 4 | belong to it by reason of a person, as it belongs to ~the Divine
2132 3, 4 | assume by reason of the Person; not, however, that ~it
2133 3, 5 | from the dignity of the Person assuming, Whom it did not
2134 3, 5 | a body to the unity of ~Person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[5] A[1]
2135 3, 6 | unity of hypostasis or person. But the body pertains immediately
2136 3, 6 | the ~human hypostasis or person, even as the soul. Indeed,
2137 3, 6 | being united to the Word in Person; especially ~since a person
2138 3, 6 | Person; especially ~since a person is found only in the rational
2139 3, 6 | the human nature in the Person of the Word, ~and is the
2140 3, 7 | is the true God in Divine Person and Nature. Yet ~because
2141 3, 7 | because together with unity of person there remains distinction
2142 3, 7 | For it is said in ~the Person of Christ (Ps. 30:1): "In
2143 3, 7 | grace is infinite, as the Person of God is infinite. ~The
2144 3, 7 | be united to the Divine Person, and this ~also is an infinite
2145 3, 7 | infinity' - Ed.] of the Divine Person, to Whom Christ's soul ~
2146 3, 7 | than that which is in the Person. And hence the grace ~of
2147 3, 7 | nature to the unity of the Person preceded the ~habitual grace
2148 3, 7 | human nature with the Divine Person, ~which, as we have said
2149 3, 7 | principle of ~the union is the Person of the Son assuming human
2150 3, 7 | nature with the Divine Person. Hence the habitual grace
2151 3, 7 | Christ is united to the Person of the Word from the beginning ~
2152 3, 7 | genera even as the ~Divine Person Himself. Hence there is
2153 3, 8 | sin, because in him the ~person corrupted the nature; and
2154 3, 8 | corrupt nature ~corrupts the person. Now grace is not vouchsafed
2155 3, 8 | nature, the other to the person as in Adam we distinguish
2156 3, 8 | of the ~nature and of the person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[8] A[5]
2157 3, 8 | sakes I have done it in the person of ~Christ," and 2 Cor.
2158 3, 8 | the devil into unity of person, as the ~humanity of Christ
2159 3, 9 | Divine took place ~in the Person, as is clear from Q[2],
2160 3, 9 | and knowledge belongs to person only by reason of a ~nature.~
2161 3, 9 | through being united to God in person, according to Ps. 64:5: ~"
2162 3, 9 | the manhood of Christ in Person, ~not in essence or nature;
2163 3, 9 | nature; yet with the unity of Person remains the ~distinction
2164 3, 10 | the ~whole Godhead in one Person is united to the human nature
2165 3, 10 | the two ~natures in the Person of Christ took place in
2166 3, 10 | human nature in the one Person of the Son, yet ~the whole
2167 3, 10 | is united to the Word in person, is more closely joined
2168 3, 12 | common mode, in ~unity of person, so above the common manner
2169 3, 13 | Incarnation the union in person so took place that there ~
2170 3, 13 | OBJ 1: By union with the Person, the Man receives omnipotence
2171 3, 13 | but because there is one Person of God and ~man.~Aquin.:
2172 3, 13 | an ~instrument united in person to God's Word; and thus
2173 3, 14 | be ~fulfilled, in whose person it is written (Is. 51:9): "
2174 3, 15 | these words are said in the ~person of Christ Himself, as appears
2175 3, 15 | things are said of Him in our person which nowise belong to Him
2176 3, 15 | Church are taken as one person." And thus Christ, ~speaking
2177 3, 15 | Christ, ~speaking in the person of His members, says (Ps.
2178 3, 15 | written (Ps. 87:4) in the person of Christ: "My ~soul is
2179 3, 16 | as man is a hypostasis or person"?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
2180 3, 16 | of the ~Incarnation one Person is not predicated of another;
2181 3, 16 | human nature not only in person, but also in ~suppositum
2182 3, 16 | signification, may stand for the Person of the Son of God, as was
2183 3, 16 | Plato. Hence, ~since the Person of the Son of God for Whom
2184 3, 16 | God," as it stands for the Person of the Son of ~God.~Aquin.:
2185 3, 16 | because of the union ~in person, and this union implies
2186 3, 16 | human, and of the union in person and hypostasis, this is
2187 3, 16 | thus it may stand for the ~Person of the Son of God, Whom
2188 3, 16 | properly predicated ~of the Person of the Son of God, as was
2189 3, 16 | word "God" stands for the Person of the Father. And in ~this
2190 3, 16 | is not predicated of the Person of the Son, because the ~
2191 3, 16 | of the Son, because the ~Person of the Son is not the Person
2192 3, 16 | Person of the Son is not the Person of the Father. And, consequently,
2193 3, 16 | as "Man" stands ~for the Person of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT
2194 3, 16 | suppositum, which is the Person of ~the Son of God, because
2195 3, 16 | So, too, we say "a Divine Person," just as we say "the person
2196 3, 16 | Person," just as we say "the person of Plato," ~on account of
2197 3, 16 | because since the unity of person remains inseparably, one
2198 3, 16 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: In God, Person and Nature are really the
2199 3, 16 | united to the other in ~person; and by reason of this union
2200 3, 16 | of Christ stands for the Person of the ~Son of God. But
2201 3, 16 | false: "God was made the Person of the Son of ~God." Therefore
2202 3, 16 | which is assumed to a Divine Person. And ~hence, when it is
2203 3, 16 | stands not for the bare Person of the Son of God, but ~
2204 3, 16 | false, ~"God was made the Person of the Son of God," yet
2205 3, 16 | this suppositum, viz. the Person of the Son of God, ~was
2206 3, 16 | sense, ~granted that the Person or hypostasis in Christ
2207 3, 16 | same as the hypostasis or Person ~of the Son of God, Who
2208 3, 16 | Who" which ~refers to the Person of the Son of God ought
2209 3, 16 | but even in His Divine Person. And hence we ~must not
2210 3, 16 | to belong to the Divine Person in ~Itself may be predicated
2211 3, 16 | the Virgin applies ~to the Person of the Son of God, as there
2212 3, 16 | hypostasis, as also one Person. For according to this,
2213 3, 16 | since he ~pretended that the Person of the Son of God is a creature,
2214 3, 16 | nature in Christ is the Person of the Son of God, ~to Whom
2215 3, 16 | as Man is a hypostasis or person"?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
2216 3, 16 | as Man is a hypostasis or person. For ~what belongs to every
2217 3, 16 | men." ~But every man is a person. Therefore Christ as Man
2218 3, 16 | Therefore Christ as Man is a person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
2219 3, 16 | individual substance. ~Now a person is nothing else than an
2220 3, 16 | Therefore Christ as Man is a ~person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
2221 3, 16 | being of human nature is a person. Therefore Christ as Man ~
2222 3, 16 | Therefore Christ as Man ~is a person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[16] A[
2223 3, 16 | as Man is not an eternal person. Therefore if ~Christ as
2224 3, 16 | Therefore if ~Christ as Man is a person it would follow that in
2225 3, 16 | said: "Christ as Man is a person," if it is taken as referring ~
2226 3, 16 | that Christ as Man is a person, since the ~suppositum of
2227 3, 16 | is nothing else than the Person of the Son of ~God. But
2228 3, 16 | human ~nature to be in a person, and in this way it is true,
2229 3, 16 | subsists in human nature is a person. Secondly it may be taken
2230 3, 16 | Christ as Man is not ~a person, since the human nature
2231 3, 16 | Nature, and yet the notion of person requires this.~Aquin.: SMT
2232 3, 16 | belongs to every man to be a person, inasmuch as ~everything
2233 3, 16 | subsisting in human nature is a person. Now this is proper to ~
2234 3, 16 | the Man Christ that the Person subsisting in His human
2235 3, 16 | Hence in ~one way He is a person, as Man; and in another
2236 3, 16 | in the ~definition of a person, implies a complete substance
2237 3, 16 | hand might be called a ~person, since it is an individual
2238 3, 16 | it cannot be called a ~person; nor, for the same reason,
2239 3, 16 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: As a person signifies something complete
2240 3, 16 | nature is not of itself a person ~apart from the Person of
2241 3, 16 | a person ~apart from the Person of the Son of God, so likewise
2242 3, 16 | that "Christ as Man is a person" we must deny all the other ~
2243 3, 17 | are two natures ~in one Person. But on account of the unity
2244 3, 17 | notwithstanding ~the distinction of Person, the Father and Son are
2245 3, 17 | notwithstanding the unity ~of Person, Christ is two on account
2246 3, 17 | predicated of the suppositum or person, except ~in God, in Whom "
2247 3, 17 | supposita in Christ, and one Person, which, in their ~opinion,
2248 3, 17 | because they asserted one Person, ~they said that Christ
2249 3, 17 | But since we maintain ~one person and one suppositum in Christ,
2250 3, 17 | reason ~of the unity of person." Hence Gregory Nazianzen
2251 3, 17 | in Christ, which is the Person of the Son ~of God, does
2252 3, 17 | natures, though there is one Person. Therefore in Christ ~there
2253 3, 17 | not said to ~belong to the person simply, but relatively;
2254 3, 17 | multiplied in one ~hypostasis or person; for the being whereby Socrates
2255 3, 17 | the very hypostasis or person in itself cannot possibly
2256 3, 17 | multiplied in ~one hypostasis or person, since it is impossible
2257 3, 17 | these pertain to the one person of Socrates, and hence there
2258 3, 17 | happened that after ~the person of Socrates was constituted
2259 3, 17 | in such a way that the Person is said ~to subsist not
2260 3, 17 | whereas it is consequent upon ~person or hypostasis, as upon that
2261 3, 17 | the Son of God to unity of Person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[17] A[
2262 3, 17 | ad 4, since the Divine Person is the same as the Nature,
2263 3, 17 | between the being of the Person and the ~being of the Nature,
2264 3, 17 | being if the being of the Person were ~distinct in them from
2265 3, 17 | belongs to the subsisting person, ~inasmuch as it has a relation
2266 3, 18 | all will belongs to the person. But in Christ there ~was
2267 3, 18 | there ~was and is but one person. Therefore in Christ there
2268 3, 18 | written (Ps. 39:9) in the person of ~Christ: "That I should
2269 3, 19 | natures in one hypostasis ~or person, whatever pertains to the
2270 3, 19 | pertains to the hypostasis or person is one and the ~same. But
2271 3, 19 | pertains to the hypostasis or person, for it is only ~a subsisting
2272 3, 19 | operation belong to the person by reason of the ~nature;
2273 3, 19 | very ~constitution of the person, and in this respect it
2274 3, 19 | consequently, unity of person requires unity of the complete
2275 3, 19 | operation is an effect of the person by reason of a ~form or
2276 3, 19 | constitute one mystical ~person. And hence it is that Christ'
2277 3, 20 | nature as ~agent, but to the person, since "acts belong to supposita
2278 3, 20 | nature as to that whereby the person or ~hypostasis acts. Hence,
2279 3, 20 | yet every hypostasis or person may be properly said to
2280 3, 20 | servant ~is attributed to a person or hypostasis according
2281 3, 20 | of ~another hypostasis or person, as if there was the person
2282 3, 20 | person, as if there was the person of the Word of ~God ruling
2283 3, 20 | Word of ~God ruling and the person of the man serving; and
2284 3, 20 | diversity of natures in the one ~person or hypostasis. And thus
2285 3, 20 | Christ" is the name ~of a Person, even as the name "Son,"
2286 3, 20 | to Him by reason of the ~Person, Which is eternal; and especially
2287 3, 20 | properly to pertain to the Person or the hypostasis. But whatever ~
2288 3, 21 | written (Ps. 83:3) in the person of Christ: "My ~heart and
2289 3, 21 | thing to be united to God in person than ~to mount to Him in
2290 3, 21 | by God to the ~unity of Person, even as every other part
2291 3, 21 | Reply OBJ 3: The union in person is according to the personal
2292 3, 21 | is said (Ps. 21:3) in the person of Christ: "I shall ~cry
2293 3, 22 | the New ~Law works in His person, according to 2 Cor. 2:10: "
2294 3, 22 | sakes have I done it in ~the person of Christ." Therefore it
2295 3, 23 | may succeed, ~as heir, the person who adopts him. But it does
2296 3, 23 | successor of a deceased person: whereas all receive the ~
2297 3, 23 | to beget belongs ~to the Person of the Father, yet to produce
2298 3, 23 | properly to the hypostasis or person, not ~to the nature; whence
2299 3, 23 | other than ~the uncreated person or hypostasis, to Whom it
2300 3, 23 | union of human nature to the Person of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT
2301 3, 23 | God, regards not only the person, but also the nature: but
2302 3, 24 | His human nature ~and His person. But it cannot be said that
2303 3, 24 | neither by reason of the person; ~for this person is the
2304 3, 24 | of the person; ~for this person is the Son of God, not by
2305 3, 24 | itself of natures in the ~Person of Christ falls under the
2306 3, 24 | the nature ~and not to the Person - that is to say, that on
2307 3, 24 | the Son of God in unity of Person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[24] A[
2308 3, 24 | for we do not speak of a person's ~nature, but of his person,
2309 3, 24 | person's ~nature, but of his person, as being predestinated:
2310 3, 24 | to the Son of God in the Person."~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[24] A[
2311 3, 24 | attribute predestination to the Person of Christ: not, ~indeed,
2312 3, 24 | although it ~is natural to that Person, considered in Himself,
2313 3, 24 | of ~predestination. For a person is properly said to be predestinated
2314 3, 24 | is to be referred to the Person not in ~Himself, but by
2315 3, 24 | nature: since, although that Person ~was the Son of God from
2316 3, 24 | be said absolutely of the Person of ~Christ that He began
2317 3, 24 | bestowed an it was it united in Person to the Son of ~God. Consequently,
2318 3, 25 | consider two things in a person to whom honor is ~given:
2319 3, 25 | whom honor is ~given: the person himself, and the cause of
2320 3, 25 | that by reason of which the person honored has a ~certain excellence.
2321 3, 25 | be one in respect of the person ~honored, but several in
2322 3, 25 | Christ there is but one Person of the Divine and ~human
2323 3, 25 | honor on the part of the Person adored: but on the part ~
2324 3, 25 | Christ's soul is united to a Person of greater ~dignity, to
2325 3, 25 | greater ~dignity, to that Person is honor principally due
2326 3, 25 | God is united thereto in person." ~And on Ps. 98:5, "Adore
2327 3, 25 | on account of which the person, in whom it is, is honored.
2328 3, 25 | So that one and the same Person of Christ is ~adored with "
2329 3, 25 | united to the Son of God in Person. But this ~cannot be said
2330 3, 25 | united to the Word of God ~in Person, yet it was united to Him
2331 3, 26 | Contra Felic. x): "One is the Person of Christ: ~lest there be
2332 3, 29 | wedlock are honored in her ~person, in contradiction to those
2333 3, 31 | natures in the unity of one Person, He has given a ~dignity
2334 3, 32 | of God into the unity of Person, not by ~reason of its merits,
2335 3, 32 | into so great unity of Person, that He Himself should
2336 3, 32 | authority in regard to the Person of the Son, ~who by this
2337 3, 32 | The mission refers to the Person assuming, who is sent by ~
2338 3, 32 | consubstantiality to the Person assuming.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2339 3, 33 | Secondly, on the part of the Person of the Son, whose body was
2340 3, 34 | of God unto the unity ~of Person." But human nature was taken
2341 3, 35 | regards the nature or the person?~(2) Whether another, besides
2342 3, 35 | the nature rather than the person?~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[35] A[
2343 3, 35 | nature rather than the ~person. For Augustine [*Fulgentius]
2344 3, 35 | nature rather than the person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[35] A[
2345 3, 35 | nativity. But Christ's Person did not begin to exist by
2346 3, 35 | the nature, and not the person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[35] A[
2347 3, 35 | something is: and whereas person or hypostasis designates
2348 3, 35 | nativity is attributed to the person or hypostasis as to ~the
2349 3, 35 | sometimes put instead of person or hypostasis. And in this ~
2350 3, 35 | and born, ~inasmuch as the Person of the Son was conceived
2351 3, 35 | not denominated from the person ~born, but from nature,
2352 3, 35 | exist: rather ~is it the person that begins to exist in
2353 3, 35 | which something is; whereas person ~designates something as
2354 3, 35 | not to be born. But the ~Person of the Son of God was perfect
2355 3, 35 | speaking, nativity regards the person. But in ~Christ there is
2356 3, 35 | Christ there is only one person. Therefore in Christ there
2357 3, 35 | but that from both, one ~person results. Yet we do not say
2358 3, 35 | the human nature to His Person, He became the ~child of
2359 3, 35 | 3: Nativity regards the person as its subject, the nature
2360 3, 35 | can be attributed ~to that Person: both when a word is employed
2361 3, 35 | birth are attributed to the person and hypostasis in ~respect
2362 3, 35 | was taken by the Divine Person in the very ~beginning of
2363 3, 35 | assumed unto unity of ~the Person or hypostasis of the Word
2364 3, 35 | His human nature, of the Person who has both the ~divine
2365 3, 35 | sometimes it stands for the Person of the Father alone, sometimes
2366 3, 35 | sometimes only ~for the Person of the Son or of the Holy
2367 3, 35 | stands only for the incarnate Person of ~the Son.~Aquin.: SMT
2368 3, 35 | things ~that pertain to the Person. But filiation belongs especially
2369 3, 35 | belongs especially to the ~Person, since it is a personal
2370 3, 35 | filiation, which is the person or ~hypostasis, put only
2371 3, 35 | is but one ~hypostasis or person. Because the unity or plurality
2372 3, 35 | part of the nature, but the person or hypostasis alone; and
2373 3, 35 | is no other hypostasis or person than the eternal, there
2374 3, 35 | relation ~regards directly the person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[35] A[
2375 3, 37 | from some quality of the person who ~receives the name;
2376 3, 37 | and human natures in the Person of the Son of God, the result ~
2377 3, 37 | united to Him in unity of person. ~Therefore there was no
2378 3, 38 | faith or hope which the person baptized had in ~Christ
2379 3, 39 | of the Church and of the person baptized conduces to ~the
2380 3, 39 | the unity of the Divine ~Person; since it is not said that
2381 3, 39 | assume it into unity of person. Wherefore, after the words
2382 3, 42 | case with Christ, in whose person the ~following words are
2383 3, 43 | contrary, It was said in the person of His adversaries (Jn. ~
2384 3, 45 | is a quality of the ~very person in himself; whereas the
2385 3, 45 | pertains to the ~aspect of His Person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[45] A[
2386 3, 46 | because ~from His Divine Person it would have had infinite
2387 3, 46 | 12) on behalf of Christ's Person: ~"O all ye that pass by
2388 3, 46 | exhibit beforehand in His own person the ~future condition of
2389 3, 46 | Divine was effected in the Person, in the ~hypostasis, in
2390 3, 46 | so that it is the same Person and hypostasis of the Divine
2391 3, 46 | namely, by ~union in Person - "destroyed death"; since
2392 3, 47 | he can do so; just as one person is said to drench another
2393 3, 47 | it was united in unity of person ~with the Divine Word, as
2394 3, 48 | written (Ps. 68:5) in Christ's person: "Then did ~I pay that which
2395 3, 48 | members are as one mystic person; and ~therefore Christ's
2396 3, 48 | flesh, but also from the Person assuming it - namely, ~inasmuch
2397 3, 49 | body, is reckoned ~as one person with its head, which is
2398 3, 49 | they endure in their own person; yet, by the co-operation
2399 3, 50 | to the flesh in Christ's Person, is greater than ~the grace
2400 3, 51 | in a divine or prophetic person is a sign of something great." ~
2401 3, 52 | woes, I wonder whether any person would dare to assert that ~
2402 3, 52 | referred to the hypostasis or person, while ~the neuter belongs
2403 3, 52 | was separated from the ~Person of the Son of God, as stated
2404 3, 52 | tomb, because the whole Person was there through the ~body
2405 3, 52 | hell, because the ~whole Person of Christ was there by reason
2406 3, 52 | a part of the ~uncreated Person, but of the assumed nature.
2407 3, 52 | body; not so the Divine Person. Consequently when death
2408 3, 52 | 1~Reply OBJ 3: Christ's Person is whole in each single
2409 3, 53 | 2) the quality of the Person rising; (3) the ~manifestation
2410 3, 53 | hence it is said in His ~Person (Ps. 138:2): "Thou hast
2411 3, 55 | else ~the difference in the person seen: and this is because
2412 3, 57 | it belongs to the same person to ascend into heaven as ~
2413 3, 57 | human nature in unity of ~person.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[57] A[
2414 3, 58 | nature, and a ~distinction in person; and thus Christ as the
2415 3, 58 | of nature, ~and unity of person. According to this, Christ
2416 3, 58 | if "as" denote ~unity of person, thus again as man, He sits
2417 3, 58 | nevertheless by ~reason of the Person with whom it is united.
2418 3, 58 | Father, but only to the Person who assumed it; but it ~
2419 3, 59 | seems to belong to the same person to judge as it ~does to
2420 3, 59 | OBJ 2: Further, the same person cannot be both judge and
2421 3, 59 | since one and the same Person is God and Man, ~our Lord
2422 3, 60 | one is on ~the part of the person who says the words, and
2423 3, 60 | intercession may help the person baptized to preserve the
2424 3, 63 | likeness to some principal person in whom is vested ~the authority
2425 3, 64 | sakes have I done it in the person of Christ," i.e. as ~though
2426 3, 64 | the Godhead in unity ~of Person, it has a certain headship
2427 3, 64 | dares to utter, in the person of Christ, words polluted
2428 3, 64 | necessity when even a lay person might baptize, he ~would
2429 3, 64 | a ~sacrament acts in the person of the whole Church, whose
2430 3, 64 | a sacrament acts in the person of the Church by whose faith ~
2431 3, 65 | first, in regard to his own person; secondly, in regard to
2432 3, 65 | concupiscence, not only the person but also the nature is defiled: ~
2433 3, 66 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the person baptized sometimes does
2434 3, 66 | unfitting to address the ~person baptized with these words: "
2435 3, 66 | 1/1~OBJ 7: Further, the Person of the Father is designated
2436 3, 66 | that in the name of one Person another is implied, as ~
2437 3, 66 | mentions the name of only one Person may believe aright in the
2438 3, 66 | it is ~unfitting that the person baptized should be anointed
2439 3, 67 | 5) Whether an unbaptized person can baptize?~(6) Whether
2440 3, 67 | baptize one and the same person?~(7) Whether it is essential
2441 3, 67 | someone should raise the person ~baptized from the sacred
2442 3, 67 | sacrament; nor would ~the person thus baptized have to be
2443 3, 67 | not." But a ~non-baptized person has not the sacrament of
2444 3, 67 | Consequently, an unbaptized person can ~baptize in a case of
2445 3, 67 | allowable that an unbaptized person should baptize rather ~than
2446 3, 67 | for then the mutilated person would have to pronounce
2447 3, 67 | the words, ~and the dumb person would have to perform the
2448 3, 67 | to baptize an unbaptized person, ~and each, so far as he
2449 3, 67 | he who raises a ~baptized person from the font is not bound
2450 3, 67 | Nevertheless an unbaptized person cannot be a godparent, ~
2451 3, 67 | although an unbaptized person: ~because the person baptizing
2452 3, 67 | unbaptized person: ~because the person baptizing is essential to
2453 3, 68 | since it is directed to the person of the minister, belongs ~
2454 3, 68 | without the intention of the person born. ~Therefore, seemingly,
2455 3, 68 | intention on the part of the ~person baptized.~Aquin.: SMT TP
2456 3, 68 | part of the body of ~the person baptized be in some way
2457 3, 68 | to receive Baptism, the person baptized must have the intention,
2458 3, 68 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: A person should not be baptized while
2459 3, 69 | communicated to every baptized person, so that he is healed ~just
2460 3, 69 | are communicated to the ~person baptized, inasmuch as he
2461 3, 69 | this way, that at first the person infected the ~nature, and
2462 3, 69 | the nature infected the person. Whereas Christ in ~reverse
2463 3, 69 | repairs what regards the person, and afterwards ~will simultaneously
2464 3, 70 | fittingly instituted in the person ~of Abraham.~Aquin.: SMT
2465 3, 70 | circumcision, in regard to ~the person; but on the part of the
2466 3, 71 | is nothing unfitting in a person being bound ~by another
2467 3, 71 | priest) breathing (upon the person ~to be baptized); while
2468 3, 71 | Baptism in respect of ~the person baptized, something is done
2469 3, 71 | catechize and exorcize the person to be ~baptized?~Aquin.:
2470 3, 71 | catechize and ~exorcize the person to be baptized. For it belongs
2471 3, 72 | required to stand for the person to be confirmed?~(11) Whether
2472 3, 72 | action is included; and the person of the baptizer is expressed ~
2473 3, 72 | is included in the ~first person of the verb. It is, however,
2474 3, 73 | into the substance of the person ~nourished, and consequently
2475 3, 76 | seems to happen when to one ~person it is seen under the species
2476 3, 78 | be taken as spoken in the person of the priest saying ~them,
2477 3, 78 | sacraments are pronounced in the ~person of the minister, whether
2478 3, 78 | Christ were speaking in person, so ~that it is given to
2479 3, 78 | understood as spoken in the person of Christ, even though the ~
2480 3, 78 | also is it determinate in person. Consequently, ~in order
2481 3, 78 | in order to determine the person, it ought to be said: "This
2482 3, 78 | implicitly points to the chief ~person, i.e. the person of the
2483 3, 78 | chief ~person, i.e. the person of the speaker, sufficiently
2484 3, 78 | sufficiently indicates Christ's ~person, in Whose person these words
2485 3, 78 | Christ's ~person, in Whose person these words are uttered,
2486 3, 78 | testament. Moreover, Christ's Person is eternal, in ~Whose blood
2487 3, 78 | words are uttered in the person of Christ, it is from His ~
2488 3, 78 | words are pronounced in the person of Christ, Who ~says of
2489 3, 79 | nourishment ~is united with the person nourished. But because this
2490 3, 79 | recipients; thus the baptized person alone receives effect of ~
2491 3, 80 | We cannot inhibit any person from Communion, except he
2492 3, 80 | being extorted from any person by ~trial made by burning
2493 3, 80 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: A person is hindered necessarily,
2494 3, 80 | Gregory says ~that such a person "is to be left to his own
2495 3, 80 | take Communion to the sick person, lest he die ~without Communion."~
2496 3, 80 | midnight. ~Consequently, if any person takes anything by way of
2497 3, 80 | Remiss. xii): "Let ~every person of either sex devoutly receive
2498 3, 81 | spoken by the priest in the ~person of Christ are not more powerful
2499 3, 82 | performs this sacrament in the person of ~Christ. But a devout
2500 3, 82 | performed only as in the person of Christ. Now ~whoever
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-3000 | 3001-3079 |