1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-2518
Part, Question
501 1, 62 | sin." Therefore the holy angels ~cannot sin.~Aquin.: SMT
502 1, 62 | answer that, The beatified angels cannot sin. The reason for
503 1, 62 | Consequently the will of the angels is referred to opposites,
504 1, 62 | greater liberty of will in the angels, who cannot ~sin, than there
505 1, 62 | 1~Whether the beatified angels advance in beatitude?~Aquin.:
506 1, 62 | seem that the beatified angels can advance in beatitude. ~
507 1, 62 | perfect charity in ~the angels. Therefore the beatified
508 1, 62 | Therefore the beatified angels can merit. Now, as merit ~
509 1, 62 | Therefore the beatified ~angels can progress in beatitude.~
510 1, 62 | same thing happens ~to the angels, whom He uses for spiritual
511 1, 62 | then, that the beatified angels ~can merit, and can advance
512 1, 62 | able to advance. But the angels are not in the ~highest
513 1, 62 | condition of ~life. But angels are not wayfarers travelling
514 1, 62 | Consequently the beatified angels can ~neither merit nor advance
515 1, 62 | useful for the beatified angels, ~inasmuch as they are a
516 1, 62 | Nevertheless the joy of the angels ~can be increased with regard
517 1, 62 | shall be'] ~joy before the angels of God upon one sinner doing
518 1, 63 | 1/1 - THE MALICE OF THE ANGELS WITH REGARD TO SIN (NINE
519 1, 63 | place we must consider how angels became evil: first of all ~
520 1, 63 | be evil of fault in the angels?~(2) What kind of sins can
521 1, 63 | absolutely the highest among the ~angels?~(8) Was the sin of the
522 1, 63 | evil of fault can be in the angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[63] A[
523 1, 63 | no evil of fault in the angels. ~For there can be no evil
524 1, 63 | in potentiality. But the angels have not being in ~potentiality,
525 1, 63 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the angels are higher than the heavenly
526 1, 63 | neither can there by in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[63] A[
527 1, 63 | But it is ~natural for the angels to be moved by the movement
528 1, 63 | not sin. Consequently the angels cannot sin.~Aquin.: SMT
529 1, 63 | apparently good. Now ~for the angels there can be no apparent
530 1, 63 | before guilt. Therefore the angels can desire only what it
531 1, 63 | said (Job 4:18): "In His angels He found ~wickedness."~Aquin.:
532 1, 63 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: In the angels there is no potentiality
533 1, 63 | action of free-will in the ~angels, by reason of which evil
534 1, 63 | there are no passions in the angels to fetter reason or ~intellect,
535 1, 63 | can be other sins in the angels besides ~those of pride
536 1, 63 | be ~pride and envy in the angels; but likewise sloth and
537 1, 63 | be pride and envy in the ~angels, for the same reason there
538 1, 63 | evident that God surpasses the angels, not merely in accidentals,
539 1, 63 | 1~OBJ 2: Further, as the angels are created by God, so are
540 1, 63 | natural." Therefore some angels may be naturally wicked.~
541 1, 63 | darkness," whereby the angels who sinned are denoted.
542 1, 63 | their creation some of the angels were made blessed, and ~
543 1, 63 | Christ, or ~also the good angels. Therefore the demons likewise
544 1, 63 | beatitude. But with the angels the reward follows immediately ~
545 1, 63 | others have said that the angels, in the first instant of
546 1, 63 | movement of free-will in the angels; for, as has been already
547 1, 63 | agent which brought the angels into existence, namely,
548 1, 63 | distinguish between the angels before the ~turning away
549 1, 63 | 62], A[3]). For since the angels ~attain beatitude by one
550 1, 63 | vi, ~text. 2. But in the angels, who are not subject to
551 1, 63 | the first ~instant in the angels is understood to respond
552 1, 63 | that the highest among the angels who sinned was ~not the
553 1, 63 | therefore the highest of the angels sinned, it ~follows that
554 1, 63 | all, but one of the lower angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[63] A[
555 1, 63 | set over all the hosts of angels, surpassed them in ~brightness,
556 1, 63 | sinning. If, then, in the angels we ~consider the proneness
557 1, 63 | it seems that the higher angels were less likely to sin
558 1, 63 | governed by God through the ~angels, as Augustine says (De Trin.
559 1, 63 | from saying that the lower angels were divinely set ~aside
560 1, 63 | were of the lower grade of ~angels; yet in that order some
561 1, 63 | it existed in ~the higher angels more than in the lower.
562 1, 63 | probable view: ~because the angels' sin did not come of any
563 1, 63 | was the chief of the lower angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[63] A[
564 1, 63 | does not appear that the angels sinned by desiring to be ~
565 1, 63 | themselves to him, then the lower angels would have sinned more deeply ~
566 1, 63 | prepared for the devil and his angels" (Mt. 25:41). For the order
567 1, 63 | natural energy than the lower angels, he fell into sin ~with
568 1, 63 | It would seem that more angels sinned than stood firm.
569 1, 63 | same way in men ~and in angels. But there are more wicked
570 1, 63 | reason it is so with the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[63] A[
571 1, 63 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the angels are distinguished according
572 1, 63 | is expounded of the good angels who are with us to aid ~
573 1, 63 | 1/1~I answer that, More angels stood firm than sinned.
574 1, 63 | known to the few. In the angels there is only an intellectual
575 1, 63 | to the lower order of the angels, who are set over earthly
576 1, 64 | specially manifest to the angels, whether good or bad. That
577 1, 64 | proper ~knowledge of the angels is twofold; namely, morning
578 1, 64 | 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the angels at their creation knew the
579 1, 64 | Civ. Dei xi, 33), the good angels are ~separated from them
580 1, 64 | by learning from the good angels: because "there ~is no fellowship
581 1, 64 | done either by means of the angels, ~or "through some temporal
582 1, 64 | same degree as to the holy angels, ~to whom many more things
583 1, 64 | Creator, as it is in the good angels, ~has something of the Divine
584 1, 64 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: All the angels had some knowledge from
585 1, 64 | demons never had. Yet all the angels ~did not fully and equally
586 1, 64 | them as it was to the holy angels, who enjoy a participated
587 1, 64 | revelation from the holy angels; for ~while not agreeing
588 1, 64 | with ~the knowledge of the angels (Q[57], A[3], ad 3).~Aquin.:
589 1, 64 | Such a statement deprives angels and saints of true beatitude, ~
590 1, 64 | that the will of the good angels is confirmed in good, and
591 1, 64 | what the fall is to the angels." ~Now it is clear that
592 1, 64 | after. Therefore the ~good angels who adhered to justice,
593 1, 64 | OBJ 1: The good and wicked angels have free-will, but according
594 1, 64 | 1/2~I answer that, The angels in their own nature stand
595 1, 64 | fittingly done through the good angels. In another way, ~indirectly,
596 1, 64 | consequently, the ministry of the angels and wrestling with demons ~
597 1, 64 | Hence until then the good angels are sent to us here; ~and
598 1, 64 | just as some of the good angels are with the holy souls
599 1, 64 | the wicked, both men and angels, will be in ~hell, and the
600 1, 64 | wicked souls and wicked angels, even as on good souls and
601 1, 64 | on good souls and good ~angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[64] A[
602 1, 64 | belongs to ~the glory of the angels, yet their glory is not
603 1, 65 | through the medium of the angels?~(4) Whether the forms of
604 1, 65 | forms of bodies are from the angels or immediately from ~God.~
605 1, 65 | through the medium of ~the angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[65] A[
606 1, 65 | through the medium of the angels. For, as all things are
607 1, 65 | forms of bodies are from the angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[65] A[
608 1, 65 | of bodies come from the angels. For ~Boethius says (De
609 1, 65 | corporeal matter serves the angels at their nod, but rather ~
610 1, 65 | then, are not from ~the angels, but from God.~Aquin.: SMT
611 1, 65 | substances, which we call the angels. And there ~are two ways
612 1, 65 | intelligences" by them, but ~"angels" by us) proceed all the
613 1, 65 | forms he understands the angels, we say that from them come
614 1, 66 | created it was filled with angels; and Basil [*Hom. ~ii. in
615 1, 66 | the blessedness ~of the angels, equality with whom is promised
616 1, 66 | the demons apart from the ~angels by supposing that the former
617 1, 66 | itself motionless, just as ~angels of the highest rank, who
618 1, 69 | spiritual ~forms, such as the angels and the heavenly bodies,
619 1, 73 | was anticipated in the ~angels by way of similitude; and
620 1, 74 | knowledge in the mind of the angels, ~and hence, according to
621 1, 74 | because the formation of the angels is recorded on the first
622 1, 74 | things were made by the angels, to mention ~how things
623 1, 74 | morning ~knowledge of the angels, which has been explained (
624 1, 75 | held that human souls and ~angels are all of the same species;
625 1, 76 | quite impossible ~for many angels to be of one species.~Aquin.:
626 1, 76 | knowledge of truth, as the angels are; but has ~to gather
627 1, 77 | above when speaking of the ~angels (Q[54], A[3]). Secondly,
628 1, 77 | operations and powers. But to angels a smaller variety ~of powers
629 1, 77 | intellectual appetite, as in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[77] A[
630 1, 43 | by the ~ministry of the angels; as Augustine says (De Trin.
631 1, 43 | any, came by means of the angels. ~Thus the angels are sent,
632 1, 43 | of the angels. ~Thus the angels are sent, and not the Holy
633 1, 43 | by the ministry of the ~angels, not to signify the person
634 1, 45 | nigh unto Thyself" - viz. angels - "the other nigh unto ~
635 1, 46 | that neither good nor ~bad angels can create anything. Much
636 1, 48 | promoted to the order of angels according to the ~diversity
637 1, 51 | Para. 1/4 - TREATISE ON THE ANGELS (QQ[50]-64)~OF THE SUBSTANCE
638 1, 51 | OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE ANGELS ABSOLUTELY CONSIDERED (FIVE
639 1, 51 | Para. 2/4~Concerning the angels, we consider first what
640 1, 51 | creature is corporeal. Now angels are God's creatures, ~as
641 1, 51 | Praise ye" the Lord, "all His angels"; and, ~farther on (verse
642 1, 51 | were created." Therefore angels are corporeal.~Aquin.: SMT
643 1, 51 | 103:4): "Who makes His angels spirits."~Aquin.: SMT FP
644 1, 51 | and thus it ~is said that angels, compared to God, are material
645 1, 51 | that, Some assert that the angels are composed of matter and ~
646 1, 51 | understood to be in the angels; and this is what some say,
647 1, 51 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels exist in any great number?~
648 1, 51 | It would seem that the angels are not in great numbers.
649 1, 51 | But this cannot be in the angels, since they are incorporeal,
650 1, 51 | above (A[1]). Therefore the angels cannot exist in any great ~
651 1, 51 | apprehend. ~Therefore the angels are not in greater number
652 1, 51 | harmony, held ~that the angels, in so far as they are styled
653 1, 51 | divine message are styled angels; and ~again, even the powers
654 1, 51 | things to be designated as angels. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[
655 1, 51 | it must be said that the angels, even inasmuch as they are ~
656 1, 51 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: In the angels number is not that of discrete
657 1, 51 | the multiplication of the angels is not ~to be taken according
658 1, 51 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels differ in species?~Aquin.:
659 1, 51 | It would seem that the angels do not differ in species.
660 1, 51 | according to species. But all angels ~agree in what is noblest
661 1, 51 | intellectuality. ~Therefore all the angels are of one species.~Aquin.:
662 1, 51 | change a species. But the angels ~seem to differ only from
663 1, 51 | intellect. Therefore the ~angels do not differ specifically.~
664 1, 51 | species. So therefore are the ~angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[50] A[
665 1, 51 | Therefore there are many angels of one ~species.~Aquin.:
666 1, 51 | iii, text 2). But in the angels even of the one order there
667 1, 51 | Ang. x). Therefore the ~angels are not of the same species.~
668 1, 51 | Others, again, that all the angels are of the one ~species,
669 1, 51 | others allege that all the angels of one ~hierarchy, or even
670 1, 51 | materially. If, ~therefore, the angels be not composed of matter
671 1, 51 | it is impossible for two angels to be of ~one species; just
672 1, 51 | substances. And if the ~angels had matter, not even then
673 1, 51 | then could there be several angels of one ~species. For it
674 1, 51 | and in like manner all the angels differ in ~species according
675 1, 51 | air: and in this way the angels are diversified ~according
676 1, 51 | to be multiplied in ~the angels than for individuals to
677 1, 51 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels are incorruptible?~Aquin.:
678 1, 51 | It would seem that the angels are not incorruptible; for ~
679 1, 51 | be ~understood to be the angels. Therefore the angels are
680 1, 51 | the angels. Therefore the angels are corruptible by ~their
681 1, 51 | corruptible. Therefore, since the ~angels were made by God, it would
682 1, 51 | necessarily be maintained that the angels are ~incorruptible of their
683 1, 51 | being, as happens in the angels, as was said above (A[2]),
684 1, 51 | Contra Maxim. iii). The angels obtain perfect ~immutability
685 1, 51 | that all ~things, even the angels, would lapse into nothing,
686 1, 51 | principle of ~corruption in the angels; but that the nature of
687 1, 51 | but that the nature of the angels is dependent ~upon God as
688 1, 52 | Out. Para. 1/2 - OF THE ANGELS IN COMPARISON WITH BODIES (
689 1, 52 | We next inquire about the angels in comparison with corporeal
690 1, 52 | bodies; secondly, of ~the angels in comparison with corporeal
691 1, 52 | of inquiry:~(1) Whether angels have bodies naturally united
692 1, 52 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels have bodies naturally united
693 1, 52 | OBJ 1: It would seem that angels have bodies naturally united
694 1, 52 | the nature of demons and angels is the same. Therefore angels
695 1, 52 | angels is the same. Therefore angels have bodies ~naturally united
696 1, 52 | body and soul. Therefore angels ~have bodies naturally united
697 1, 52 | life is more perfect in the angels than in souls. But ~the
698 1, 52 | the body. Therefore the angels ~animate bodies which are
699 1, 52 | Div. Nom. iv) that "the angels are ~understood to be incorporeal."~
700 1, 52 | 1/1~I answer that, The angels have not bodies naturally
701 1, 52 | bodies, and these we call ~angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[51] A[
702 1, 52 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether angels assume bodies?~Aquin.: SMT
703 1, 52 | OBJ 1: It would seem that angels do not assume bodies. For
704 1, 52 | would be superfluous for the angels to ~assume bodies, because
705 1, 52 | all bodies moved by the angels are assumed ~by them. Therefore
706 1, 52 | by them. Therefore the angels do not assume bodies.~Aquin.:
707 1, 52 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, angels do not assume bodies from
708 1, 52 | or color. Therefore the angels do not assume bodies.~Aquin.:
709 1, 52 | says (De Civ. Dei xvi) that angels appeared ~to Abraham under
710 1, 52 | have maintained that the angels never assume ~bodies, but
711 1, 52 | Scripture of apparitions of angels ~happened in prophetic vision -
712 1, 52 | time to time ~introduces angels so apparent as to be seen
713 1, 52 | commonly by all; just as the ~angels who appeared to Abraham
714 1, 52 | Consequently, since the angels are not bodies, nor have
715 1, 52 | 1 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Angels need an assumed body, not
716 1, 52 | life to come. Moreover that angels assumed bodies under the
717 1, 52 | bodies are so fashioned by ~angels as fittingly to represent
718 1, 52 | the clouds. Even so the angels assume bodies of ~air, condensing
719 1, 52 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels exercise functions of life
720 1, 52 | It would seem that the angels exercise functions of life
721 1, 52 | pretence is unbecoming in angels of truth. But it ~would
722 1, 52 | functions. Therefore the ~angels exercise functions of life
723 1, 52 | Further, in the works of the angels there is nothing without
724 1, 52 | says (De Anima ii). But the angels are ~manifestly seen to
725 1, 52 | Abraham walked with" the angels, who had appeared to him, ~"
726 1, 52 | thereof." Therefore the angels often exercise functions
727 1, 52 | of Sacred Scripture that ~angels spoke in assumed bodies.
728 1, 52 | life ~(Lk. 24). Now when angels appeared in their assumed
729 1, 52 | Gn. 18). Therefore the angels exercise functions of life
730 1, 52 | But this has befallen ~the angels in their assumed bodies;
731 1, 52 | 6:4). Consequently ~the angels exercised vital functions
732 1, 52 | contrary, The bodies assumed by angels have no life, as was ~stated
733 1, 52 | in assumed ~bodies by the angels, as to that which is common
734 1, 52 | to the truth of the holy angels that through their assumed ~
735 1, 52 | properties and works of the angels may be manifested by the
736 1, 52 | lead us to men, ~and not to angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[51] A[
737 1, 52 | no way be said that the angels perceive through the organs
738 1, 52 | spiritual powers of the angels may be made ~manifest; just
739 1, 52 | the bodies assumed by the angels are not thus moved, since
740 1, 52 | not thus moved, since the ~angels are not their forms. Yet
741 1, 52 | not their forms. Yet the angels are moved accidentally,
742 1, 52 | He is everywhere; yet the angels are ~moved accidentally
743 1, 52 | Properly speaking, the angels do not talk through their ~
744 1, 52 | Properly speaking, the angels cannot be said to eat, ~
745 1, 52 | eating. But the food taken by angels ~was neither changed into
746 1, 52 | deny it. But God's ~holy angels could not fall in such fashion
747 1, 53 | Out. Para. 1/1 - OF THE ANGELS IN RELATION TO PLACE (THREE
748 1, 53 | inquire into the place of the angels. Touching this there are ~
749 1, 53 | at once?~(3) Can several angels be in the same place?~Aquin.:
750 1, 53 | Breviary]: "Let Thy holy angels who dwell herein, keep us
751 1, 53 | no such ~quantity in the angels, for theirs is a virtual
752 1, 53 | Orth. ii) that "while the ~angels are in heaven, they are
753 1, 53 | Para. 1/1~Whether several angels can be at the same time
754 1, 53 | would seem that several angels can be at the same time
755 1, 53 | fill the place. But the angels do not fill a place, ~because
756 1, 53 | 52,58). Therefore several angels can ~be in the one place.~
757 1, 53 | than there is between two angels. But an angel and a body
758 1, 53 | Much more, ~then, can two angels be in the same place.~Aquin.:
759 1, 53 | reason there are not two angels in the same place.~Aquin.:
760 1, 53 | that, There are not two angels in the same place. The reason
761 1, 53 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: Several angels are not hindered from being
762 1, 54 | THE LOCAL MOVEMENT OF THE ANGELS (THREE ARTICLES)~We must
763 1, 54 | the local movement of the angels; under which ~heading there
764 1, 54 | because of want. But the holy angels ~have no want. Therefore
765 1, 54 | want. Therefore the holy angels are not moved locally.~Aquin.:
766 1, 55 | OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE ANGELS (FIVE ARTICLES)~After considering
767 1, 55 | intelligence?~(4) Is there in the angels an active and a passive
768 1, 55 | writings, Dionysius styles angels "intellects" and "minds."
769 1, 55 | Coel. Hier. xi) that "the angels are ~divided into substance,
770 1, 55 | necessities is absent from the angels. They are ~neither sometimes
771 1, 55 | is not generated in the angels, ~but is present naturally.
772 1, 55 | intellectual knowledge in the angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[
773 1, 55 | that the knowledge of the angels is not exclusively ~intellectual.
774 1, 55 | Civ. Dei viii) that in the angels ~there is "life which understands
775 1, 55 | De Summo Bono) that the angels have learnt ~many things
776 1, 55 | same reason it is in the angels, since they are of ~the
777 1, 55 | and understands with the angels."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[54] A[
778 1, 55 | parts of ~the body. Now the angels have no bodies naturally
779 1, 55 | soul. For ~this reason the angels are called "intellects"
780 1, 55 | such men as contended that angels and demons have bodies ~
781 1, 55 | can be attributed to ~the angels according to the likeness
782 1, 55 | through the senses: the angels likewise know single ~objects,
783 1, 55 | memory can be allowed in the angels, according as Augustine (
784 1, 56 | points of inquiry:~(1) Do the angels know everything by their
785 1, 56 | things?~(3) Do the higher angels know by more universal species
786 1, 56 | species than the lower ~angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[55] A[
787 1, 56 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels know all things by their
788 1, 56 | It would seem that the angels know all things by their
789 1, 56 | Div. Nom. vii) that "the angels, according to the ~proper
790 1, 56 | without matter, such as the angels, the ~medium whereby the
791 1, 56 | Div. Nom. iv) that "the angels are ~enlightened by the
792 1, 56 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels understand by species drawn
793 1, 56 | It would seem that the angels understand by species drawn
794 1, 56 | Div. Nom. vii) that the "angels do not ~gather their Divine
795 1, 56 | The species whereby the angels understand are not drawn ~
796 1, 56 | substances - that is, the angels - the power of understanding
797 1, 56 | substances - that is, the angels - are utterly free from
798 1, 56 | which are lower than the angels are so ~created that they
799 1, 56 | 1/1~Whether the higher angels understand by more universal
800 1, 56 | species than the ~lower angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[55] A[
801 1, 56 | would seem that the higher angels do not understand by more ~
802 1, 56 | universal species than the lower angels. For the universal, seemingly,
803 1, 56 | abstracted from particulars. But angels do not understand by ~species
804 1, 56 | therefore, the higher ~angels know by more universal species
805 1, 56 | Hier. xii) that the higher angels ~have a more universal knowledge
806 1, 56 | is ~said that the higher angels have more universal forms.~
807 1, 57 | into the knowledge of the angels with regard to the ~objects
808 1, 57 | Dionysius ~says that "the angels do not know their own powers" (
809 1, 57 | they," that is to say the ~angels, "knew their own powers":
810 1, 57 | this respect, that the ~angels do not know their own power
811 1, 57 | Divine Wisdom, Which to the angels is ~incomprehensible.~Aquin.:
812 1, 57 | subsisting without matter, as the angels are, there is nothing to ~
813 1, 57 | be known by the existing ~angels; or else he would have to
814 1, 57 | would follow that the higher angels could not know the lower, ~
815 1, 57 | spiritual natures of the angels are distinguished from ~
816 1, 57 | causality be admitted in the ~angels, this will suffice for one
817 1, 57 | God resolved to make more angels or ~more natures of things,
818 1, 57 | It would seem that the angels cannot know God by their
819 1, 57 | through a mirror belong to the angels, since ~they do not derive
820 1, 57 | Nom. vii). Therefore the angels cannot know God ~by their
821 1, 57 | 1/1~On the contrary, The angels are mightier in knowledge
822 1, 57 | Therefore much more so can ~the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[56] A[
823 1, 57 | 1/2~I answer that, The angels can have some knowledge
824 1, 58 | objects which are known by the angels. ~Under this heading there
825 1, 58 | inquiry:~(1) Whether the angels know the natures of material
826 1, 58 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels know material things?~Aquin.:
827 1, 58 | It would seem that the angels do not know material things.
828 1, 58 | cannot be the perfections of angels, since they are ~beneath
829 1, 58 | beneath them. Therefore the angels do not know material things.~
830 1, 58 | nor sensible vision in the angels, but only ~intellectual.
831 1, 58 | intellectual. Therefore the angels cannot know material things.~
832 1, 58 | which does not ~exist in angels. Therefore angels do not
833 1, 58 | exist in angels. Therefore angels do not know material things.~
834 1, 58 | among other creatures the angels are nearest to God, and
835 1, 58 | things pre-exist in the angels more ~simply and less materially
836 1, 58 | of such subject. But the angels are intellectual beings
837 1, 58 | His essence, so do the ~angels know them, forasmuch as
838 1, 58 | forasmuch as they are in the angels by their ~intelligible species.~
839 1, 58 | the ~intellect of man and angels, as the thing understood
840 1, 58 | OBJ 1: It would seem that angels do not know singulars. For
841 1, 58 | universals." Now, in the angels there is no ~power of understanding
842 1, 58 | what he does not know. But angels ~guard individual men, according
843 1, 58 | 90:11: "He hath given His angels ~charge over Thee." Consequently
844 1, 58 | Thee." Consequently the angels know singulars.~Aquin.:
845 1, 58 | Some have denied to the angels all knowledge of ~singulars.
846 1, 58 | things are administered by angels, ~according to Heb. 1:14: "
847 1, 58 | according to which the angels are stated to be the movers
848 1, 58 | imparted to them do the angels know things, not only as
849 1, 58 | keeping with the nature of the angels, ~as was said above (Q[55],
850 1, 58 | to their nature that the angels are ~likened to material
851 1, 58 | 3 Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: Angels know singulars by universal
852 1, 58 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether angels know the future?~Aquin.:
853 1, 58 | It would seem that the angels know future events. For
854 1, 58 | know future events. For angels are ~mightier in knowledge
855 1, 58 | Therefore much more do the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[57] A[
856 1, 58 | Therefore it appears that the ~angels know indifferently things
857 1, 58 | by reason of place. But angels know things which are distant ~
858 1, 58 | does ~not belong to the angels. But to know future events
859 1, 58 | are gods." Therefore the ~angels do not know future events.~
860 1, 58 | future ~events exists in the angels, and by so much the more
861 1, 58 | by ~God's revelation. The angels know the future in the same
862 1, 58 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether angels know secret thoughts?~Aquin.:
863 1, 58 | It would seem that the angels know secret thoughts. For
864 1, 58 | who rise shall be like the angels, as is stated ~(Mt. 22:30).
865 1, 58 | God does not belong to the angels. ~But it is proper to God
866 1, 58 | search the heart." Therefore angels do not ~know the secrets
867 1, 58 | pulse. Much more then can angels, or ~even demons, the more
868 1, 58 | not exist at all ~in the angels; while the second will remain,
869 1, 58 | will remain, and is in the angels now. ~Nevertheless the brightness
870 1, 58 | Since, ~therefore, the angels know corporeal things and
871 1, 58 | happens in brutes. Yet the angels do ~not necessarily know
872 1, 58 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels know the mysteries of grace?~
873 1, 58 | It would seem that the angels know mysteries of grace.
874 1, 58 | all mysteries. But ~the angels knew of it from the beginning;
875 1, 58 | godliness appeared ~unto angels*." [*Vulg.: 'Great is the
876 1, 58 | which . . . ~appeared unto angels.'] Therefore the angels
877 1, 58 | angels.'] Therefore the angels know the mysteries of grace.~
878 1, 58 | the Divine wisdom. But the angels behold God's wisdom, which
879 1, 58 | prophets are enlightened by the angels, as is clear ~from Dionysius (
880 1, 58 | the prophets." Therefore angels know ~the mysteries of grace.~
881 1, 58 | already. Yet even the ~highest angels seek out and learn mysteries
882 1, 58 | Is. ~63:1, where, on the angels asking, "Who is he who cometh
883 1, 58 | justice." Therefore the angels do not ~know mysteries of
884 1, 58 | species. By such knowledge the angels cannot know ~mysteries of
885 1, 58 | another knowledge of the angels, which renders them happy;
886 1, 58 | yet so that the higher angels ~beholding the Divine wisdom
887 1, 58 | communicate to the lower ~angels by enlightening them. Some
888 1, 58 | conditions. Thus not all the angels were instructed on all points ~
889 1, 58 | beginning; even the higher angels learned these afterwards,
890 1, 58 | Reply OBJ 2: Although the angels in bliss behold the Divine
891 1, 58 | more excellent way to the angels. And ~although God revealed
892 1, 59 | in Phys. iii, 6. But the angels' minds are moved ~by understanding,
893 1, 59 | Pt. 1:12): "On Whom the angels desire to look." Therefore
894 1, 59 | ad lit. ii): "Since the angels ~were created, in the eternity
895 1, 59 | heavenly intellects, the angels, have no intelligible ~potentiality
896 1, 59 | Word. For the ~bliss of the angels consists in such vision;
897 1, 59 | desire on the part of the angels does not exclude the ~object
898 1, 59 | by such knowledge as the angels have of things through the ~
899 1, 59 | knowledge wherewith the angels know things by ~innate species,
900 1, 59 | through another. But the angels know one thing through another;
901 1, 59 | Div. Nom. vii) that the "angels do not ~acquire Divine knowledge
902 1, 59 | A[1]; Q[55], A[1]), the angels ~hold that grade among spiritual
903 1, 59 | is the condition of the angels, because in the truths which ~
904 1, 59 | intellectual light, like the angels, then in the first aspect
905 1, 59 | knowledge. And in this way the angels know things in ~the Word.~
906 1, 59 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The angels can syllogize, in the sense
907 1, 59 | Experience is affirmed of angels and demons simply by way ~
908 1, 59 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the angels understand by composing
909 1, 59 | It would seem that the angels understand by composing
910 1, 59 | the angelic mind; because angels ~apprehend different things
911 1, 59 | But in speaking to ~men, angels use affirmative and negative
912 1, 59 | Reply OBJ 3: The fact that angels use affirmative and negative
913 1, 59 | in the intellect of the angels. Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
914 1, 59 | can be nescience in the angels. ~Therefore it seems there
915 1, 59 | error in the minds of the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
916 1, 59 | is not the method of the angels; but through the (knowledge
917 1, 59 | every creature, the good angels form no judgments as to
918 1, 59 | while nescience is in the angels as ~regards things knowable,
919 1, 59 | evening" knowledge in the angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
920 1, 59 | morning ~knowledge in the angels; because evening and morning
921 1, 59 | evening knowledge in the angels, for the same reason it ~
922 1, 59 | knowledge be admitted in the angels, ~because of the existence
923 1, 59 | divides the knowledge of the angels into morning and evening ~
924 1, 59 | is, to the enlightened angels, who are quite apart from
925 1, 59 | the evil spirits. The good angels, while knowing the ~creature,
926 1, 59 | following, in so far as the angels refer to ~God's praise their
927 1, 59 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The angels themselves are also creatures.
928 1, 59 | day" the knowledge of the angels is to be understood, ~as
929 1, 59 | evening knowledge of the angels are one and the same.~Aquin.:
930 1, 59 | at the same time. But the angels are always using their morning ~
931 1, 59 | knowledge is that by ~which the angels know things in their proper
932 1, 59 | stated (Q[55], A[2]), the angels do not draw ~their knowledge
933 1, 59 | evening knowledge is ~in the angels in so far as they know the
934 1, 59 | knowledge, in so far as when the angels ~behold the Word, they know
935 1, 59 | classes of things known by the angels; so that the day's unit
936 1, 59 | morning knowledge in the angels; hence there is nothing
937 1, 59 | at the same time in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[58] A[
938 1, 60 | Para. 1/1 - THE WILL OF THE ANGELS (FOUR ARTICLES)~In the next
939 1, 60 | concerning the will of the ~angels. In the first place we shall
940 1, 60 | Whether there is will in the angels?~(2) Whether the will of
941 1, 60 | Is there free-will in the angels?~(4) Is there an irascible
942 1, 60 | Whether there is will in the angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
943 1, 60 | there is no will in the angels. For as the ~Philosopher
944 1, 60 | there is no reason in the angels, but something higher than
945 1, 60 | there is no will in the angels, but something higher than
946 1, 60 | is no imperfection in the angels, ~especially in the blessed
947 1, 60 | object ~understood. Now the angels are immovable, since they
948 1, 60 | there is no will in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
949 1, 60 | Therefore ~there is will in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
950 1, 60 | necessarily place a will in the angels. In evidence thereof, it
951 1, 60 | Accordingly, since the angels by their intellect know
952 1, 60 | the same. Therefore in the angels, who are purely intellectual,
953 1, 60 | kind from existing in the angels, ~since such movement is
954 1, 60 | Para. 1/1~Whether in the angels the will differs from the
955 1, 60 | contrary, The will in the angels regards good things only,
956 1, 60 | Therefore the will of the angels is distinct from their intellect.~
957 1, 60 | 3~I answer that, In the angels the will is a special faculty
958 1, 60 | there is free-will in the angels? ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
959 1, 60 | there is no free-will in the angels. For the ~act of free-will
960 1, 60 | can be no choice with the ~angels, because choice is "the
961 1, 60 | Ethic. iii, 3. But ~the angels' knowledge is not the result
962 1, 60 | is no ~free-will in the angels. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
963 1, 60 | alternatives. But in ~the angels on the part of their intellect
964 1, 60 | natural endowments of the angels belong to them ~according
965 1, 60 | less; because in the higher angels the ~intellectual nature
966 1, 60 | of man's dignity. But the angels' ~dignity surpasses that
967 1, 60 | more reason is it in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
968 1, 60 | is there free-will in the angels, and ~in a higher degree
969 1, 60 | Hence there is choice in the angels, yet not with ~the inquisitive
970 1, 60 | nobler manner in the higher angels than it does in the lower,
971 1, 60 | concupiscible appetite in the angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
972 1, 60 | concupiscible ~appetite in the angels. For Dionysius says (Div.
973 1, 60 | are of the same nature as angels; for sin has not altered
974 1, 60 | concupiscible appetite in the ~angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
975 1, 60 | good and to the wicked ~angels. Therefore there is an irascible
976 1, 60 | concupiscible appetite in ~the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
977 1, 60 | these virtues are in the angels. Therefore there is both
978 1, 60 | irascible appetite in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
979 1, 60 | which does not ~exist in angels. Consequently there is no
980 1, 60 | concupiscible ~appetite in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[59] A[
981 1, 60 | since there exists in the angels ~only an intellective appetite,
982 1, 60 | these things is said of the ~angels, as by way of passions;
983 1, 60 | they do not exist ~in the angels in this manner. For in them
984 1, 61 | LOVE OR DILECTION OF THE ANGELS (FIVE ARTICLES)~The next
985 1, 61 | there is natural love in the angels?~(2) Whether there is in
986 1, 61 | love or dilection in the ~angels. For, natural love is contradistinguished
987 1, 61 | its own nature. ~Now the angels are not acted upon, but
988 1, 61 | no ~natural love in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[
989 1, 61 | natural knowledge in the angels. Therefore there is also
990 1, 61 | place natural love in the angels. In ~evidence of this we
991 1, 61 | is love of choice in the angels?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[
992 1, 61 | no love of choice in the angels. For ~love of choice appears
993 1, 61 | intellectual, which is proper to angels, as is said (Div. ~Nom.
994 1, 61 | no love of choice in the angels.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[60] A[
995 1, 61 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the angels have only natural knowledge
996 1, 61 | only natural love in the angels. Therefore there is no love
997 1, 61 | But ~by their love the angels merit or demerit. Therefore
998 1, 61 | that, There exists in the angels a natural love, and a love
999 1, 61 | intellectual nature of the angels is perfect, only natural
1000 1, 61 | have no love for ~the good angels. Therefore an angel does
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2500 | 2501-2518 |