1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2462
Part, Question
501 1, 39 | appropriated to ~another. For the Father is not wise by the wisdom
502 1, 39 | these three are ~one by the Father; all are equal by the Son,
503 1, 39 | according to Augustine, to the Father is attributed ~"power,"
504 1, 39 | not be appropriated to the Father.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
505 1, 39 | from Him' refers to the Father, ~'by Him' to the Son, '
506 1, 39 | should be appropriated to the Father, Who is "the principle from ~
507 1, 39 | observes, "that is, with the Father Who is My ~head," also this
508 1, 39 | could have said, "He Who is Father, Son, ~and Holy Ghost, and
509 1, 39 | further, "He Who is the Father, and the Son, and the Holy
510 1, 39 | false; ~because no person is Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Therefore
511 1, 39 | is appropriated to the Father, "species" to ~the Son, "
512 1, 39 | likeness to the property of the Father, Who is ~"a principle without
513 1, 39 | perfectly the nature of the Father. ~To insinuate this, Augustine
514 1, 39 | the express ~Image of the Father. Hence we see that an image
515 1, 39 | So "use," whereby the Father and the Son enjoy each other,
516 1, 39 | appropriates "unity" to the Father, ~"equality" to the Son, "
517 1, 39 | it is appropriated to the Father, to Whom any other person
518 1, 39 | are one, by reason of the ~Father; They are equal by reason
519 1, 39 | once in the person of the Father, even if by an ~impossible
520 1, 39 | derive their unity from the Father. But if the other persons
521 1, 39 | not find equality in the Father, but we find it as soon
522 1, 39 | principle of equality in the Father, but that, without the ~
523 1, 39 | without the ~Son equal to the Father, the Father could not be
524 1, 39 | equal to the Father, the Father could not be called equal;
525 1, 39 | Holy Ghost is equal to the Father, is also from the Son. Likewise,
526 1, 39 | of the union between the Father and the Son. So ~all are
527 1, 39 | Ghost, we find whence the Father and the Son are said to
528 1, 39 | likeness to the heavenly Father, Who is the principle of ~
529 1, 39 | Godhead. But in an earthly father it is wanting sometimes
530 1, 39 | is appropriated to ~the Father in the same way as power.
531 1, 39 | be ~appropriated to the Father, Who is "the principle without
532 1, 39 | divine persons, of Whom the Father is the principle, do not ~
533 1, 40 | as in the ~person of the Father there is paternity and common
534 1, 40 | common spiration in the Father and in ~the Son. Therefore
535 1, 40 | property. For we say that the Father begets; ~but not that the
536 1, 40 | Boethius (De Hebdom.). But the Father is Father by ~paternity.
537 1, 40 | Hebdom.). But the Father is Father by ~paternity. In the same
538 1, 40 | themselves, as paternity is the Father Himself, ~and filiation
539 1, 40 | same as the person of the ~Father, and the person of the Son;
540 1, 40 | that we may say ~that the Father is distinguished from the
541 1, 40 | persons; as ~paternity is the Father, and filiation is the Son,
542 1, 40 | relations; whence this name ~"Father" signifies not only a property,
543 1, 40 | forasmuch as ~this name "Father" signifies the relation
544 1, 40 | OBJ 2: Further, that the Father is Father, and that He is
545 1, 40 | Further, that the Father is Father, and that He is someone,
546 1, 40 | reason. For as He is the Father by paternity, ~supposing
547 1, 40 | mentally abstracted from the Father, He still remains "someone" -
548 1, 40 | Unbegotten is not the ~same as Father; for if the Father had not
549 1, 40 | same as Father; for if the Father had not begotten the Son,
550 1, 40 | remains the hypostasis of the Father as unbegotten.~Aquin.: SMT
551 1, 40 | not the hypostasis of ~the Father, which is, as it were, a
552 1, 40 | instance, if the fact of the Father's being ~unbegotten or spirating
553 1, 40 | mentally abstracted from the Father, the ~Father's hypostasis
554 1, 40 | abstracted from the Father, the ~Father's hypostasis or person remains.~
555 1, 40 | thus paternity is the ~Father Himself. For hypostasis
556 1, 40 | by origin; so ~that the Father is a hypostasis as not from
557 1, 40 | OBJ 2: By paternity the Father is not only Father, but
558 1, 40 | paternity the Father is not only Father, but is a ~person, and is "
559 1, 40 | that the hypostasis of the ~Father would remain as unbegotten,
560 1, 40 | distinguished the hypostasis of the Father; ~for this would be impossible,
561 1, 40 | unbegotten being is the Father. So, ~if paternity be removed,
562 1, 40 | removed, the hypostasis of the Father does not remain in ~God,
563 1, 40 | i, D, xxvii) that ~"the Father always is, because He is
564 1, 40 | operation of the person of the ~Father. But paternity constitutes
565 1, 40 | constitutes the person of the Father. Therefore in ~the order
566 1, 40 | because He begets, ~He is the Father." A distinction, however,
567 1, 40 | generation is attributed to the Father, and spiration, taken for
568 1, 40 | act, is attributed to the Father and the Son; passive, as ~
569 1, 40 | relative property common to the Father and the ~Son. The personal
570 1, 40 | personal property of the Father can be considered in a twofold ~
571 1, 40 | because He begets, He is ~Father," the term "Father" is taken
572 1, 40 | He is ~Father," the term "Father" is taken as meaning relation
573 1, 40 | conversely that because He is Father He begets.~Aquin.: SMT FP
574 1, 40 | from ~the person of the Father; wherefore it presupposes
575 1, 40 | personal property ~of the Father.~
576 1, 41 | It ~is a property of the Father to beget the Son." Therefore
577 1, 41 | attribute "to beget" with the Father, and to the Son "to be begotten."~
578 1, 41 | natural necessity was the Father led to beget ~the Son."~
579 1, 41 | Son was begotten of the Father by will.~Aquin.: SMT FP
580 1, 41 | proceeds as Love from the Father and the Son. Therefore He
581 1, 41 | the Son ~proceeds from the Father by will, and not by nature.~
582 1, 41 | necessary. Therefore if the ~Father begot the Son, not by the
583 1, 41 | the same book, that, "the Father ~begot the Son neither by
584 1, 41 | it can be said that ~the Father begot the Son by will; as
585 1, 41 | must be said the God the Father begot the Son, not ~by His
586 1, 41 | creature, said that ~the Father begot the Son by will, taking
587 1, 41 | contrary, must assert that the Father begot the Son, not ~by will,
588 1, 41 | the concomitance of the Father's will in the generation
589 1, 41 | for they said that the Father begot the Son in such a
590 1, 41 | natural necessity ~did the Father beget the Son."~Aquin.:
591 1, 41 | it is necessary that the ~Father beget the Son.~Aquin.: SMT
592 1, 41 | from ~anything. For if the Father begets the Son from something,
593 1, 41 | something different from the Father exists in the Son, and this ~
594 1, 41 | different exists." If the Father begets the Son from ~Himself,
595 1, 41 | follows that either the Father does not remain after the ~
596 1, 41 | is begotten, or that the Father is the Son, which is false.
597 1, 41 | is false. Therefore ~the Father does not beget the Son from
598 1, 41 | is generated. So if the Father generate the Son from His ~
599 1, 41 | essence or nature of the ~Father is the principle of the
600 1, 41 | another thing from the ~Father's essence. Therefore the
601 1, 41 | the Son is not from the Father's essence.~Aquin.: SMT FP
602 1, 41 | Petrum i, 1) says: ~"God the Father, of His nature, without
603 1, 41 | from nothing, but from the ~Father's substance. For it was
604 1, 41 | Son to proceed from the Father as out of nothing, then
605 1, 41 | the Son ~would be to the Father what the thing made is to
606 1, 41 | of God proceeds from the Father out of ~nothing, He could
607 1, 41 | Who is in the bosom of the Father, ~He hath declared Him";
608 1, 41 | of the substance of the ~Father, but not in the same way
609 1, 41 | necessarily follows that the Father in begetting the Son does
610 1, 41 | the Son was born of the Father, the ~preposition "of" designates
611 1, 41 | begotten of the essence of the ~Father, as the Master of the Sentences
612 1, 41 | begotten of the essence of the Father" - that is, of the ~Father
613 1, 41 | Father" - that is, of the ~Father Who is essence; and so Augustine
614 1, 41 | 13): "When I ~say of the Father Who is essence, it is the
615 1, 41 | explicitly, of the essence of the Father."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
616 1, 41 | son is said to be "of" the father, or a material principle,
617 1, 41 | of' the essence of the Father, inasmuch as the essence
618 1, 41 | inasmuch as the essence of the Father, communicated by generation,
619 1, 41 | begotten of the essence of the ~Father, a term is added which saves
620 1, 41 | the immutability of the Father may be understood, and from ~
621 1, 41 | the unity of nature in the Father and the Son. In this way ~
622 1, 41 | Maxim. iii, 1): "If God the ~Father could not beget a co-equal
623 1, 41 | omnipotence of God ~the Father?" Power therefore exists
624 1, 41 | So, as we understand the Father to be principle of generation; ~
625 1, 41 | of generation; ~and the Father and the Son to be the principle
626 1, 41 | power of generating to the Father, and the power of ~spiration
627 1, 41 | power of ~spiration to the Father and the Son; for the power
628 1, 41 | persons, but proper to the Father. Therefore it does not signify
629 1, 41 | in virtue of which the father has the power to beget a
630 1, 41 | the Son of God is like the Father, who begets Him, in the
631 1, 41 | the divine nature in the Father is in Him the power of ~
632 1, 41 | signified as the form of the Father, nevertheless it is a personal ~
633 1, 41 | respect to the person of the Father, what the ~individual form
634 1, 41 | understood as that by which the Father begets, but as ~constituting
635 1, 41 | constituting the person of the Father, otherwise the Father would
636 1, 41 | the Father, otherwise the Father would beget ~the Father.
637 1, 41 | Father would beget ~the Father. But that by which the Father
638 1, 41 | Father. But that by which the Father begets is the divine nature,
639 1, 41 | say, the ~"essence of the Father." Wherefore in respect of
640 1, 41 | proper to the person of the ~Father. ~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
641 1, 41 | OBJ 3: Further, God the Father has greater power to beget
642 1, 41 | beget than has a ~created father. But a man can beget several
643 1, 41 | so that the power of the Father is not diminished after ~
644 1, 41 | in God there is only "one Father, one ~Son, one Holy Ghost."
645 1, 41 | has the ~same power as the Father; but we cannot grant that
646 1, 41 | beget." Just as, although Father and Son have the same being,
647 1, 41 | follow that the Son is the Father, by reason of the notional
648 1, 41 | begetting power in the Father.~
649 1, 42 | Son is the image of the Father; ~and so the Father is not
650 1, 42 | the Father; ~and so the Father is not equal to the Son.
651 1, 42 | understand equality to be in the Father, ~Son and Holy Ghost, inasmuch
652 1, 42 | the same nature in both Father and Son, but also is it
653 1, 42 | the Son is like to the ~Father, in order to exclude the
654 1, 42 | that He is ~equal to the Father to exclude the error of
655 1, 42 | is equal ~and like to the Father, and conversely. This is
656 1, 42 | essence is not more the Father's than the Son's. Wherefore,
657 1, 42 | has the greatness of the Father, and is therefore equal
658 1, 42 | therefore equal to the ~Father, so the Father has the greatness
659 1, 42 | equal to the ~Father, so the Father has the greatness of the
660 1, 42 | the Son ~receives from the Father, this, namely, that He is
661 1, 42 | that He is equal to the Father, ~and not conversely, for
662 1, 42 | Son is equalled to ~the Father, but not conversely.~Aquin.:
663 1, 42 | principle, as the ~Son with the Father?~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[
664 1, 42 | principle, as the Son with the Father. For Arius gives twelve
665 1, 42 | no place in God, for the Father is not predicated of the
666 1, 42 | a man is begotten of his father; which implies priority
667 1, 42 | if the Son ~is from the Father, we must say that He is
668 1, 42 | that He is less than the Father, or later ~than the Father,
669 1, 42 | Father, or later ~than the Father, or both.~Aquin.: SMT FP
670 1, 42 | Son is generated by the Father. Therefore He begins to ~
671 1, 42 | not co-eternal with the Father.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[
672 1, 42 | the Son be begotten by the Father, either He is ~always being
673 1, 42 | Son is co-eternal with the Father. ~In proof of which we must
674 1, 42 | Q[41], A[2]), that the Father does not beget the ~Son
675 1, 42 | nature; and also that the Father's nature was perfect ~from
676 1, 42 | that the action whereby the Father produces the ~Son is not
677 1, 42 | existed whensoever the Father existed and thus the Son
678 1, 42 | is co-eternal with ~the Father, and likewise the Holy Ghost
679 1, 42 | existed always with the Father; let the ~Word announce
680 1, 42 | being ~begotten, and the Father is always begetting.~Aquin.:
681 1, 42 | the Son is equal to the Father in greatness?~Aquin.: SMT
682 1, 42 | Son is not equal to the Father in ~greatness. For He Himself
683 1, 42 | Himself said (Jn. 14:28): "The Father is greater than ~I"; and
684 1, 42 | paternity is part of the Father's dignity. But paternity ~
685 1, 42 | does not possess all the ~Father's dignity; and so He is
686 1, 42 | equal in greatness to the Father.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[
687 1, 42 | Therefore, since in the ~Father there are three notions,
688 1, 42 | evidently not equal to the Father.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[
689 1, 42 | necessarily equal to the Father in greatness. ~For the greatness
690 1, 42 | nature which is in the Father, in the same way as it is
691 1, 42 | same way as it is in the Father ~Himself. But since in men
692 1, 42 | not ~equal at first to the father who begets him, but attains
693 1, 42 | power of generation in the Father was ~defective, nor that
694 1, 42 | eternally ~equal to the Father in greatness. Hence, Hilary
695 1, 42 | natural ~nativity, is the father's equal, because he has
696 1, 42 | wherein He is less than the Father, and subject to Him; but
697 1, 42 | nature He is equal to the Father. This is expressed by Athanasius, "
698 1, 42 | Athanasius, "Equal ~to the Father in His Godhead; less than
699 1, 42 | His Godhead; less than the Father in humanity": and by ~Hilary (
700 1, 42 | the fact of giving, the Father is greater; but ~He is not
701 1, 42 | Therefore, paternity ~is the Father's dignity, as also the Father'
702 1, 42 | Father's dignity, as also the Father's essence: since dignity
703 1, 42 | same ~essence, which in the Father is paternity, in the Son
704 1, 42 | same dignity which, in the Father is paternity, in the Son
705 1, 42 | possesses whatever dignity ~the Father has; but we cannot argue - "
706 1, 42 | but we cannot argue - "the Father has paternity, ~therefore
707 1, 42 | substance to relation. For the Father and the Son have the same
708 1, 42 | dignity, which exist in the Father by the relation of giver,
709 1, 42 | Whether the Son is in the Father, and conversely?~Aquin.:
710 1, 42 | seem that the Son and the Father are not in each other. ~
711 1, 42 | which is the Son in the Father, ~or conversely; as is patent
712 1, 42 | Therefore ~the Son and the Father are not in each other.~Aquin.:
713 1, 42 | eternity came out from the Father, according to Micheas 5:
714 1, 42 | Therefore the Son is not in the Father.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[
715 1, 42 | other. But the Son ~and the Father are relatively opposed.
716 1, 42 | Jn. 14:10): "I am in the Father, and the ~Father is in Me."~
717 1, 42 | in the Father, and the ~Father is in Me."~Aquin.: SMT FP
718 1, 42 | consideration as regards the ~Father and the Son; the essence,
719 1, 42 | to each the Son and the Father are in each other. The Father
720 1, 42 | Father are in each other. The Father is ~in the Son by His essence,
721 1, 42 | essence, forasmuch as the Father is His own essence and ~
722 1, 42 | it follows that as the Father's essence is in the Son,
723 1, 42 | essence is in the Son, the Father Himself ~is in the Son;
724 1, 42 | that He Himself is in the Father in Whom is His essence.
725 1, 42 | Philosopher, are the Son and the Father in each other. ~The mode
726 1, 42 | Son's going forth from the Father is by mode of the ~interior
727 1, 42 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The Father and the Son are relatively
728 1, 42 | the Son is equal to the Father in power?~Aquin.: SMT FP
729 1, 42 | Son is not equal to the Father in power. ~For it is said (
730 1, 42 | Himself but ~what He seeth the Father doing." But the Father can
731 1, 42 | the Father doing." But the Father can act of Himself. ~Therefore
732 1, 42 | Himself. ~Therefore the Father's power is greater than
733 1, 42 | obeys and hears. But the Father commands the Son ~according
734 1, 42 | according to Jn. 14:31: "As the Father gave Me commandment so do
735 1, 42 | commandment so do I." The ~Father also teaches the Son: "The
736 1, 42 | also teaches the Son: "The Father loveth the Son, and showeth
737 1, 42 | Jn. 5:30). Therefore the Father has greater power than ~
738 1, 42 | Further, it belongs to the Father's omnipotence to be able
739 1, 42 | omnipotence of God the Father?" But the Son cannot beget
740 1, 42 | all that belongs to the ~Father's omnipotence; and hence
741 1, 42 | Whatsoever things the Father ~doth, these the Son also
742 1, 42 | necessarily equal to the Father in power. ~Power of action
743 1, 42 | that the Son should be the ~Father's equal in greatness - that
744 1, 42 | the Son is equal to the Father in power; and the same ~
745 1, 42 | any power possessed by the Father, since it is ~immediately
746 1, 42 | Whatsoever things the Father doth, the Son doth in ~like
747 1, 42 | derives His power ~from the Father, of Whom He receives His
748 1, 42 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The Father's "showing" and the Son'
749 1, 42 | taken in the sense that the Father communicates knowledge to
750 1, 42 | essence. The command of the Father can be explained ~in the
751 1, 42 | essence is paternity in the Father, and ~filiation in the Son:
752 1, 42 | so by the same power the Father begets, and the Son ~is
753 1, 42 | Son can do whatever the Father ~can do; yet it does not
754 1, 42 | same omnipotence as the ~Father, but with another relation;
755 1, 42 | with another relation; the Father possessing power as ~"giving"
756 1, 43 | not alone, but I and the ~Father that sent Me."~Aquin.: SMT
757 1, 43 | said to be sent ~by the Father into the world, inasmuch
758 1, 43 | of the Son, not ~from the Father, but from His mother; or
759 1, 43 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Father can be fittingly sent?~Aquin.:
760 1, 43 | is fitting also that the Father should be ~sent. For being
761 1, 43 | person is given. But the ~Father gives Himself since He can
762 1, 43 | it can be said that the Father sends Himself.~Aquin.: SMT
763 1, 43 | says (De Trin. ii, 3), "The Father alone is ~never described
764 1, 43 | expounded. ~Hence, as the Father is not from another, in
765 1, 43 | bestowal of something, ~the Father gives Himself, as freely
766 1, 43 | of grace is also from the Father, Who ~dwells in us by grace,
767 1, 43 | Trin. iv, 20) that "The Father, when known by anyone in
768 1, 43 | invisibly sent. As to ~the Father, though He dwells in us
769 1, 43 | that hath heard from ~the Father and hath learned, cometh
770 1, 43 | said to be ~less than the Father. But the Holy Ghost is never
771 1, 43 | said to be less than ~the Father. Therefore the Holy Ghost
772 1, 43 | is called less than the Father. But the Holy Ghost did ~
773 1, 43 | be called less than the Father by reason of any visible ~
774 1, 43 | that ~person. For as the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are
775 1, 43 | regeneration; ~hence the Father's voice spoke, "This is
776 1, 43 | as the Son manifests ~the Father. Visible apparitions of
777 1, 43 | says (De Trin. iv), "The Father ~is sent by no one because
778 1, 43 | Son is sent only by the Father; and the Holy Ghost by the
779 1, 43 | and the Holy Ghost by the Father ~and the Son. If, however,
780 1, 45 | for in the Creed, to the ~Father is attributed that "He is
781 1, 45 | object. Hence also God the Father made ~the creature through
782 1, 45 | the divine nature from the Father, and the Holy Ghost from
783 1, 45 | Son receives it from the ~Father, and the Holy Ghost from
784 1, 45 | Creator is ~attributed to the Father as to Him Who does not receive
785 1, 45 | quickens what is created by the Father through the Son. Again,
786 1, 45 | 39], A[8], ad 3), to the Father is appropriated power which
787 1, 45 | shows the ~Person of the Father, Who is the "principle from
788 1, 46 | Jn. 17:5), "Glorify Me, O Father, with ~Thyself with the
789 1, 46 | infinite series. But the ~father is the efficient cause of
790 1, 46 | principle is appropriated to the Father by reason of power, so ~
791 1, 47 | and therefore from the Father, to Whom, according to ~
792 1, 50 | of gods, whose maker ~and father am I: You are indeed my
793 1, 51 | that is, ~it belongs to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost,
794 1, 61 | answer that, God alone, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, is
795 1, 73 | is said (Jn. 5:17), "My Father worketh until now, and I ~
796 1, 74 | creation the Person of the Father is indicated by God the ~
797 1, 74 | formation, the Person of the Father is indicated by God that ~
798 1, 37 | Holy Ghost?~(2) Whether the Father and the Son love each other
799 1, 37 | De Trin. xv, 17): "As the Father, Son and Holy ~Ghost are
800 1, 37 | one; I know not ~why the Father, Son and Holy Ghost should
801 1, 37 | Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Son, as was shown ~
802 1, 37 | the Love or bond of the ~Father and the Son.~Aquin.: SMT
803 1, 37 | Ghost is ~the Love of the Father for the Son, or for something
804 1, 37 | said to be the bond of the Father and ~Son, inasmuch as He
805 1, 37 | Love; because, since the Father loves Himself and ~the Son
806 1, 37 | Love, the relation of the Father to the Son, and conversely,
807 1, 37 | But from the fact that the Father and ~the Son mutually love
808 1, 37 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Father and the Son love each other
809 1, 37 | It would seem that the Father and the Son do not love
810 1, 37 | vii, 1) proves that the Father ~is not wise by the Wisdom
811 1, 37 | A[3]). ~Therefore the Father and the Son do not love
812 1, 37 | Further, the proposition, "The Father and the Son love each other ~
813 1, 37 | way we might say that "the Father understands by the Son";
814 1, 37 | might be ~said that "the Father and the Son spirate by the
815 1, 37 | Holy Ghost," or that ~"the Father generates by the Son." Therefore
816 1, 37 | proposition true: "'The Father and the Son love each other
817 1, 37 | Further, by the same love the Father loves the Son, and Himself, ~
818 1, 37 | Himself, ~and us. But the Father does not love Himself by
819 1, 37 | cannot be said that the "Father begets Himself," or that "
820 1, 37 | this ~also is false: "The Father loves the Son by the Holy
821 1, 37 | effect that when we say, "the Father loves the Son by the Holy
822 1, 37 | principle of love to the Father and the Son; ~which cannot
823 1, 37 | it is false, that "the ~Father and the Son love each other
824 1, 37 | to the ~effect that "the Father is wise by the Wisdom begotten."
825 1, 37 | expounded, as that "the ~Father loves the Son by the Holy
826 1, 37 | Ghost is the sign that the Father loves the Son"; inasmuch
827 1, 37 | is the love whereby the Father and the Son ~formally love
828 1, 37 | essentially, it means that the Father ~and the Son love each other
829 1, 37 | Who dares to say that the Father ~loves neither Himself,
830 1, 37 | flower, so do we say that the Father, by the Word or the Son,
831 1, 37 | creatures; and that the Father and the Son love each ~other
832 1, 37 | we cannot say that "the Father is wise or intelligent by
833 1, 37 | way, we can say that the Father and the Son love each ~other
834 1, 37 | Hence we cannot say that the Father ~spirates by the Holy Ghost,
835 1, 37 | But we can say that the ~Father speaks by the Word, as by
836 1, 37 | it can be said that the Father loves the Son by the Holy
837 1, 37 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: The Father loves not only the Son,
838 1, 37 | object loved. Hence, as the Father speaks Himself and every
839 1, 37 | adequately represents ~the Father and every creature; so He
840 1, 37 | primal goodness whereby the Father loves Himself and every
841 1, 38 | essence is the Gift which the Father gives to the Son, as Hilary ~
842 1, 38 | God from ~eternity; as "Father," and "Son." Therefore "
843 1, 38 | the Son belongs to the ~Father; or as possessed by another.
844 1, 38 | this sense the Son is the Father's; and the Holy Ghost ~belongs
845 1, 38 | The divine essence is the Father's gift in the first sense, ~
846 1, 38 | first sense, ~as being the Father's by way of identity.~Aquin.:
847 1, 38 | the Son, to be from the Father, so, for the Holy Ghost, '
848 1, 38 | God' is to proceed from Father and Son." But the Holy Ghost ~
849 1, 38 | fact that He proceeds from Father and ~Son. Therefore Gift
850 1, 38 | Ghost also is like to the Father; so also, ~because the Holy
851 1, 38 | Ghost proceeds from the Father as love, He is properly ~
852 1, 38 | Son is given ~is from the Father's love, according to the
853 1, 39 | we say the ~person of the Father we mean nothing else but
854 1, 39 | but the substance of the ~Father."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
855 1, 39 | says (De Synod.) that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost ~"are
856 1, 39 | Writ never says that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are
857 1, 39 | substance predicated of the Father and the Son signifies either
858 1, 39 | for instance, "I and the Father ~are one (Jn. 10:30)," and "
859 1, 39 | 10:30)," and "I am in the Father, and the Father in Me (Jn. ~
860 1, 39 | am in the Father, and the Father in Me (Jn. ~10:38)"; and
861 1, 39 | essence; as, for instance, the Father is a person of the ~"divine
862 1, 39 | nature being proper to both Father and Son."~Aquin.: SMT FP
863 1, 39 | our future glory are the Father, Son and Holy Ghost." ~Therefore
864 1, 39 | whereas we do ~not say the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are "
865 1, 39 | personal properties in the Father, Son and Holy Ghost - it
866 1, 39 | God begot," because the Father ~generates; for the same
867 1, 39 | begot either God who is the ~Father, or God who is not the Father.
868 1, 39 | Father, or God who is not the Father. If God who is the Father,
869 1, 39 | Father. If God who is the Father, then God ~the Father was
870 1, 39 | the Father, then God ~the Father was begotten. If God who
871 1, 39 | begotten. If God who is not the Father, then there is a ~God who
872 1, 39 | God who is not God the Father: which is false. Therefore
873 1, 39 | stands for the ~person of the Father. But when we say, "God does
874 1, 39 | if we were to say, "the Father is God the ~generator" and
875 1, 39 | there are many Gods; for the Father and the Son are one God, ~
876 1, 39 | OBJ 4: This is false, "the Father begot God, that is Himself," ~
877 1, 39 | ad ~Maxim.) that "God the Father begot another self [alterum
878 1, 39 | Son is another than the Father, as ~above explained (Q[
879 1, 39 | begot God Who is God the Father," is wrong, ~because since
880 1, 39 | because since the word "Father" is construed in apposition
881 1, 39 | restricted to the person of the Father; so that it would ~mean, "
882 1, 39 | God, Who is Himself the Father"; and then the Father ~would
883 1, 39 | the Father"; and then the Father ~would be spoken of as begotten,
884 1, 39 | begot God Who is not God the Father." If ~however, we understand
885 1, 39 | God Who is God Who is the Father." Such a rendering however
886 1, 39 | is that "to be God the ~Father" is befitting to the person
887 1, 39 | is that "to be God the Father," is to be removed from
888 1, 39 | De Trin. vii, i, 2): "The Father and the Son are one ~Wisdom,
889 1, 39 | is ~predicated. But the Father is the divine essence; therefore
890 1, 39 | stand for the person of the Father. Thus the essence begets.~
891 1, 39 | because the essence ~is the Father who is begetting. Therefore
892 1, 39 | De Trin. iv, 20): "The Father is the ~principle of the
893 1, 39 | spirating. Therefore the Father begets or spirates the Godhead.~
894 1, 39 | and wisdom, is from ~the Father who is essence and wisdom.
895 1, 39 | essence is predicated of the Father by mode of ~identity by
896 1, 39 | that ~it can stand for the Father, its mode of signification
897 1, 39 | term. So when we say, ~"the Father is the principle of the
898 1, 39 | the divine nature. For the Father is not ~the Trinity; nor
899 1, 39 | say, "The essence is the Father, and the Son, and the ~Holy
900 1, 39 | the divine essence is the Father," ~the predication is one
901 1, 39 | as this proposition, "The Father is God" is of itself true,
902 1, 39 | proposition "God is the Father" is true of itself, and
903 1, 39 | is ~appropriated to the Father, as Augustine says, because
904 1, 39 | vi, 2), showing that the Father is wise, ~not by Wisdom
905 1, 39 | were Wisdom; so ~that the Father and the Son together only
906 1, 39 | called wise, but not the ~Father without the Son. But the
907 1, 39 | called the Wisdom of the Father, ~because He is Wisdom from
908 1, 39 | because He is Wisdom from the Father Who is Wisdom. For each
909 1, 39 | are one Wisdom. Whence the Father is ~not wise by the wisdom
910 1, 39 | ii): "Eternity is in the Father, the species in the Image;
911 1, 39 | persons: the name of the "Father," the name "Image" proper
912 1, 39 | appropriates "eternity" to the Father, "species" to the Son, and ~"
913 1, 39 | i, 5): "Unity is in ~the Father, equality in the Son, and
914 1, 39 | appropriated to ~another. For the Father is not wise by the wisdom
915 1, 39 | these three are ~one by the Father; all are equal by the Son,
916 1, 39 | according to Augustine, to the Father is attributed ~"power,"
917 1, 39 | not be appropriated to the Father.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
918 1, 39 | from Him' refers to the Father, ~'by Him' to the Son, '
919 1, 39 | should be appropriated to the Father, Who is "the principle from ~
920 1, 39 | observes, "that is, with the Father Who is My ~head," also this
921 1, 39 | could have said, "He Who is Father, Son, ~and Holy Ghost, and
922 1, 39 | further, "He Who is the Father, and the Son, and the Holy
923 1, 39 | false; ~because no person is Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Therefore
924 1, 39 | is appropriated to the Father, "species" to ~the Son, "
925 1, 39 | likeness to the property of the Father, Who is ~"a principle without
926 1, 39 | perfectly the nature of the Father. ~To insinuate this, Augustine
927 1, 39 | the express ~Image of the Father. Hence we see that an image
928 1, 39 | So "use," whereby the Father and the Son enjoy each other,
929 1, 39 | appropriates "unity" to the Father, ~"equality" to the Son, "
930 1, 39 | it is appropriated to the Father, to Whom any other person
931 1, 39 | are one, by reason of the ~Father; They are equal by reason
932 1, 39 | once in the person of the Father, even if by an ~impossible
933 1, 39 | derive their unity from the Father. But if the other persons
934 1, 39 | not find equality in the Father, but we find it as soon
935 1, 39 | principle of equality in the Father, but that, without the ~
936 1, 39 | without the ~Son equal to the Father, the Father could not be
937 1, 39 | equal to the Father, the Father could not be called equal;
938 1, 39 | Holy Ghost is equal to the Father, is also from the Son. Likewise,
939 1, 39 | of the union between the Father and the Son. So ~all are
940 1, 39 | Ghost, we find whence the Father and the Son are said to
941 1, 39 | likeness to the heavenly Father, Who is the principle of ~
942 1, 39 | Godhead. But in an earthly father it is wanting sometimes
943 1, 39 | is appropriated to ~the Father in the same way as power.
944 1, 39 | be ~appropriated to the Father, Who is "the principle without
945 1, 39 | divine persons, of Whom the Father is the principle, do not ~
946 1, 40 | as in the ~person of the Father there is paternity and common
947 1, 40 | common spiration in the Father and in ~the Son. Therefore
948 1, 40 | property. For we say that the Father begets; ~but not that the
949 1, 40 | Boethius (De Hebdom.). But the Father is Father by ~paternity.
950 1, 40 | Hebdom.). But the Father is Father by ~paternity. In the same
951 1, 40 | themselves, as paternity is the Father Himself, ~and filiation
952 1, 40 | same as the person of the ~Father, and the person of the Son;
953 1, 40 | that we may say ~that the Father is distinguished from the
954 1, 40 | persons; as ~paternity is the Father, and filiation is the Son,
955 1, 40 | relations; whence this name ~"Father" signifies not only a property,
956 1, 40 | forasmuch as ~this name "Father" signifies the relation
957 1, 40 | OBJ 2: Further, that the Father is Father, and that He is
958 1, 40 | Further, that the Father is Father, and that He is someone,
959 1, 40 | reason. For as He is the Father by paternity, ~supposing
960 1, 40 | mentally abstracted from the Father, He still remains "someone" -
961 1, 40 | Unbegotten is not the ~same as Father; for if the Father had not
962 1, 40 | same as Father; for if the Father had not begotten the Son,
963 1, 40 | remains the hypostasis of the Father as unbegotten.~Aquin.: SMT
964 1, 40 | not the hypostasis of ~the Father, which is, as it were, a
965 1, 40 | instance, if the fact of the Father's being ~unbegotten or spirating
966 1, 40 | mentally abstracted from the Father, the ~Father's hypostasis
967 1, 40 | abstracted from the Father, the ~Father's hypostasis or person remains.~
968 1, 40 | thus paternity is the ~Father Himself. For hypostasis
969 1, 40 | by origin; so ~that the Father is a hypostasis as not from
970 1, 40 | OBJ 2: By paternity the Father is not only Father, but
971 1, 40 | paternity the Father is not only Father, but is a ~person, and is "
972 1, 40 | that the hypostasis of the ~Father would remain as unbegotten,
973 1, 40 | distinguished the hypostasis of the Father; ~for this would be impossible,
974 1, 40 | unbegotten being is the Father. So, ~if paternity be removed,
975 1, 40 | removed, the hypostasis of the Father does not remain in ~God,
976 1, 40 | i, D, xxvii) that ~"the Father always is, because He is
977 1, 40 | operation of the person of the ~Father. But paternity constitutes
978 1, 40 | constitutes the person of the Father. Therefore in ~the order
979 1, 40 | because He begets, ~He is the Father." A distinction, however,
980 1, 40 | generation is attributed to the Father, and spiration, taken for
981 1, 40 | act, is attributed to the Father and the Son; passive, as ~
982 1, 40 | relative property common to the Father and the ~Son. The personal
983 1, 40 | personal property of the Father can be considered in a twofold ~
984 1, 40 | because He begets, He is ~Father," the term "Father" is taken
985 1, 40 | He is ~Father," the term "Father" is taken as meaning relation
986 1, 40 | conversely that because He is Father He begets.~Aquin.: SMT FP
987 1, 40 | from ~the person of the Father; wherefore it presupposes
988 1, 40 | personal property ~of the Father.~
989 1, 41 | It ~is a property of the Father to beget the Son." Therefore
990 1, 41 | attribute "to beget" with the Father, and to the Son "to be begotten."~
991 1, 41 | natural necessity was the Father led to beget ~the Son."~
992 1, 41 | Son was begotten of the Father by will.~Aquin.: SMT FP
993 1, 41 | proceeds as Love from the Father and the Son. Therefore He
994 1, 41 | the Son ~proceeds from the Father by will, and not by nature.~
995 1, 41 | necessary. Therefore if the ~Father begot the Son, not by the
996 1, 41 | the same book, that, "the Father ~begot the Son neither by
997 1, 41 | it can be said that ~the Father begot the Son by will; as
998 1, 41 | must be said the God the Father begot the Son, not ~by His
999 1, 41 | creature, said that ~the Father begot the Son by will, taking
1000 1, 41 | contrary, must assert that the Father begot the Son, not ~by will,
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2462 |