1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2380
Part, Question
501 1, 40 | not from another, and the Son is a ~hypostasis as from
502 1, 40 | follow, however, ~that the Son is not "someone" or a hypostasis;
503 1, 40 | He is ever begetting the Son." So it seems ~that generation
504 1, 40 | presupposes nativity; for the Son is so called ~because He
505 1, 40 | attributed to the Father and the Son; passive, as ~nativity is
506 1, 40 | nativity is attributed to the Son, and procession to the Holy
507 1, 40 | common to the Father and the ~Son. The personal property of
508 1, 40 | way to the person of the Son; and so, in ~the order of
509 1, 40 | constituting ~the person of the Son. But active generation signifies
510 1, 41 | the Father to beget the Son." Therefore notional acts ~
511 1, 41 | with the Father, and to the Son "to be begotten."~Aquin.:
512 1, 41 | Father led to beget ~the Son."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
513 1, 41 | us to the kingdom of ~the Son of His love" (Col. 1:13).
514 1, 41 | the will. Therefore ~the Son was begotten of the Father
515 1, 41 | from the Father and the Son. Therefore He proceeds ~
516 1, 41 | 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the Son proceeds by mode of the
517 1, 41 | a speaker. Therefore the Son ~proceeds from the Father
518 1, 41 | if the ~Father begot the Son, not by the will, it seems
519 1, 41 | the Father ~begot the Son neither by will, nor by
520 1, 41 | that ~the Father begot the Son by will; as also He is God
521 1, 41 | and wills to beget the Son. In the other sense, the ~
522 1, 41 | God the Father begot the Son, not ~by His will; but that
523 1, 41 | If anyone say that the Son was made by the ~Will of
524 1, 41 | Arians, wishing to prove the Son to be a creature, said that ~
525 1, 41 | that ~the Father begot the Son by will, taking will in
526 1, 41 | that the Father begot the Son, not ~by will, but by nature.
527 1, 41 | but perfect birth gave the Son ~a nature derived from a
528 1, 41 | willed them to be; but the Son, born of God, ~subsists
529 1, 41 | in the generation of the Son, ~for they said that the
530 1, 41 | that the Father begot the Son in such a manner by nature ~
531 1, 41 | did the Father beget the Son."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
532 1, 41 | Apostle calls Christ the Son of the love of God, ~inasmuch
533 1, 41 | were the principle of the Son's generation.~Aquin.: SMT
534 1, 41 | that the ~Father beget the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
535 1, 41 | if the Father begets the Son from something, this will
536 1, 41 | the Father exists in the Son, and this ~contradicts what
537 1, 41 | If the Father begets the Son from ~Himself, since again
538 1, 41 | does not remain after the ~Son is begotten, or that the
539 1, 41 | or that the Father is the Son, which is false. Therefore ~
540 1, 41 | Father does not beget the Son from something, but from
541 1, 41 | the Father generate the Son from His ~own essence or
542 1, 41 | is the principle of the Son. But it is not a material
543 1, 41 | person. But the person of the Son is not another thing from
544 1, 41 | s essence. Therefore the Son is not from the Father's
545 1, 41 | nothing. But in Scripture the Son ~is called a creature; for
546 1, 41 | created." Therefore the Son was not begotten from something, ~
547 1, 41 | without beginning, begot the Son equal to ~Himself."~Aquin.:
548 1, 41 | 1/2~I answer that, The Son was not begotten from nothing,
549 1, 41 | proceeds from another as a son, and "making," that the
550 1, 41 | whereas a man begets a son from himself. Now, as a
551 1, 41 | presupposed. So, ~were the Son to proceed from the Father
552 1, 41 | out of nothing, then the Son ~would be to the Father
553 1, 41 | similitude. Thus, if the Son of God proceeds from the
554 1, 41 | properly and truly called the Son, whereas the ~contrary is
555 1, 41 | That we may be in His true Son Jesus ~Christ." Therefore
556 1, 41 | Christ." Therefore the true Son of God is not from nothing;
557 1, 41 | assimilation to Him Who is the true Son. Whence, as He is the only ~
558 1, 41 | the only ~true and natural Son of God, He is called the "
559 1, 41 | 1:18, "The only begotten Son, Who is in the bosom of
560 1, 41 | conformable ~to the image of His Son, that He might be the first
561 1, 41 | brethren." Therefore the Son of God is begotten of the
562 1, 41 | Father in begetting the Son does not ~transmit any part
563 1, 41 | 1: When we say that the Son was born of the Father,
564 1, 41 | Reply OBJ 2: When we say the Son is begotten of the essence
565 1, 41 | and as he expounds, ~"the Son is begotten of the essence
566 1, 41 | active principle, as the ~son is said to be "of" the father,
567 1, 41 | then, we say that ~the Son is begotten 'of' the essence
568 1, 41 | generation, subsists in the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
569 1, 41 | 3: When we say that the Son is begotten of the essence
570 1, 41 | not of Wisdom which is the Son of God, but of created wisdom
571 1, 41 | created nature assumed by the Son, so that the sense be, "
572 1, 41 | Creator's nature. Thus the ~Son is called both created and
573 1, 41 | nature in the Father and the Son. In this way ~Hilary expounds
574 1, 41 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the Son proceeds as the word, which
575 1, 41 | could not beget a co-equal Son, where is the omnipotence
576 1, 41 | and the Father and the Son to be the principle of spiration,
577 1, 41 | spiration to the Father and the Son; for the power of generation
578 1, 41 | is it possible ~that the Son should be generated.~Aquin.:
579 1, 41 | has the power to beget the Son, so also He wills ~to beget
580 1, 41 | Body Para. 2/3~Now the Son of God is like the Father,
581 1, 41 | divine nature, in ~which the Son is like to Him. And in this
582 1, 41 | begetting can beget. But the Son has ~the power of begetting.
583 1, 41 | therefore He can beget another son. Therefore there can be ~
584 1, 41 | Contra Maxim. iii, 12): "The Son did not ~beget a Creator:
585 1, 41 | diminished after ~begetting the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
586 1, 41 | is only "one Father, one ~Son, one Holy Ghost." For this
587 1, 41 | word, which person is ~the Son; and but one person proceeding
588 1, 41 | For this reason is the Son perfect, that the entire
589 1, 41 | and that there is but one Son. The argument is similar ~
590 1, 41 | without distinction, that the Son has the ~same power as the
591 1, 41 | we cannot grant that the Son has the power ~"generandi" [
592 1, 41 | sense would be that the Son has the "power to ~beget."
593 1, 41 | as, although Father and Son have the same being, it
594 1, 41 | does not ~follow that the Son is the Father, by reason
595 1, 41 | power "generandi" is in the Son - that is, the ~power of
596 1, 41 | by those words that the Son ~could beget a Son: but
597 1, 41 | that the Son ~could beget a Son: but that if He did not,
598 1, 42 | equal to the image." But the Son is the image of the Father; ~
599 1, 42 | Father is not equal to the Son. Therefore equality is not
600 1, 42 | equality to be in the Father, ~Son and Holy Ghost, inasmuch
601 1, 42 | nature in both Father and Son, but also is it in both
602 1, 42 | we say not only that the Son is like to the ~Father,
603 1, 42 | so is likeness; for the Son is equal ~and like to the
604 1, 42 | more the Father's than the Son's. Wherefore, just as the ~
605 1, 42 | Wherefore, just as the ~Son has the greatness of the
606 1, 42 | has the greatness of the Son, and is therefore ~equal
607 1, 42 | therefore ~equal to the Son. But in reference to creatures,
608 1, 42 | receives. Since, therefore, the Son ~receives from the Father,
609 1, 42 | this reason we say that the Son is equalled to ~the Father,
610 1, 42 | with His principle, as the ~Son with the Father?~Aquin.:
611 1, 42 | with ~His principle, as the Son with the Father. For Arius
612 1, 42 | is not predicated of the Son as the ~genus of a species.
613 1, 42 | from another. So if the Son ~is from the Father, we
614 1, 42 | principle. Therefore the Son is not eternal; nor is ~
615 1, 42 | generation is ~existence. But the Son is generated by the Father.
616 1, 42 | 1~OBJ 4: Further, if the Son be begotten by the Father,
617 1, 42 | motion, it follows that the ~Son must be always imperfect,
618 1, 42 | for the begetting of the Son, and before that ~moment
619 1, 42 | before that ~moment the Son did not exist.~Aquin.: SMT
620 1, 42 | that, We must say that the Son is co-eternal with the Father. ~
621 1, 42 | Father does not beget the ~Son by will, but by nature;
622 1, 42 | the Father produces the ~Son is not successive, because
623 1, 42 | successive, because thus the Son would be successively ~generated,
624 1, 42 | Therefore we conclude that the Son ~existed whensoever the
625 1, 42 | Father existed and thus the Son is co-eternal with ~the
626 1, 42 | thee that the co-eternal Son existed always with the
627 1, 42 | His birth; let the name Son insinuate ~His consubstantiality."
628 1, 42 | Q[27], A[2]). Hence the Son is ever being ~begotten,
629 1, 42 | But the generation of the Son is not in ~the "now" of
630 1, 42 | therefore, neither is the Son ~imperfect, nor "was there
631 1, 42 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son is equal to the Father in
632 1, 42 | It would seem that the Son is not equal to the Father
633 1, 42 | says (1 Cor. 15:28): "The Son Himself shall be ~subject
634 1, 42 | does not belong to the Son. Therefore the Son does
635 1, 42 | to the Son. Therefore the Son does not possess all the ~
636 1, 42 | three notions, while in the Son there are only two, the ~
637 1, 42 | there are only two, the ~Son is evidently not equal to
638 1, 42 | 1/1~I answer that, The Son is necessarily equal to
639 1, 42 | paternity and filiation that the Son ~by generation should attain
640 1, 42 | defective, nor that the Son of God arrived at perfection
641 1, 42 | Therefore we must say that the Son was eternally ~equal to
642 1, 42 | shortcomings, then every son, by reason of his natural ~
643 1, 42 | and (De Synod.): "The ~Son subjects Himself by His
644 1, 42 | Father is paternity, in the Son is filiation, so ~the same
645 1, 42 | Father is paternity, in the Son is ~filiation. It is thus
646 1, 42 | thus true to say that the Son possesses whatever dignity ~
647 1, 42 | paternity, ~therefore the Son has paternity," for there
648 1, 42 | For the Father and the Son have the same essence ~and
649 1, 42 | relation of giver, and in ~the Son by relation of receiver.~
650 1, 42 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son is in the Father, and conversely?~
651 1, 42 | It would seem that the Son and the Father are not in
652 1, 42 | to none of which is the Son in the Father, ~or conversely;
653 1, 42 | each mode. Therefore ~the Son and the Father are not in
654 1, 42 | another is within. But ~the Son from eternity came out from
655 1, 42 | eternity." ~Therefore the Son is not in the Father.~Aquin.:
656 1, 42 | be in the other. But the Son ~and the Father are relatively
657 1, 42 | regards the ~Father and the Son; the essence, the relation
658 1, 42 | and ~according to each the Son and the Father are in each
659 1, 42 | other. The Father is ~in the Son by His essence, forasmuch
660 1, 42 | communicates His essence to the Son not by any change on His
661 1, 42 | Father's essence is in the Son, the Father Himself ~is
662 1, 42 | Father Himself ~is in the Son; likewise, since the Son
663 1, 42 | Son; likewise, since the Son is His own essence, it follows ~
664 1, 42 | the Philosopher, are the Son and the Father in each other. ~
665 1, 42 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The Son's going forth from the Father
666 1, 42 | OBJ 3: The Father and the Son are relatively opposed,
667 1, 42 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son is equal to the Father in
668 1, 42 | It would seem that the Son is not equal to the Father
669 1, 42 | is said (Jn. 5:19): "The Son cannot do anything of Himself
670 1, 42 | power is greater than the Son's.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42]
671 1, 42 | the Father commands the Son ~according to Jn. 14:31: "
672 1, 42 | Father also teaches the Son: "The Father loveth the
673 1, 42 | The Father loveth the Son, and showeth Him ~all things
674 1, 42 | doth" (Jn. 5:20). Also, the Son hears: "As I ~hear, so I
675 1, 42 | greater power than ~the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[
676 1, 42 | omnipotence to be able to ~beget a Son equal to Himself. For Augustine
677 1, 42 | God the Father?" But the Son cannot beget a Son, as proved ~
678 1, 42 | But the Son cannot beget a Son, as proved ~above (Q[41],
679 1, 42 | 41], A[6]). Therefore the Son cannot do all that belongs
680 1, 42 | Father ~doth, these the Son also doth in like manner."~
681 1, 42 | 1/1~I answer that, The Son is necessarily equal to
682 1, 42 | filiation requires that the Son should be the ~Father's
683 1, 42 | Hence it ~follows that the Son is equal to the Father in
684 1, 42 | Reply OBJ 1: The words, "the Son cannot of Himself do anything,"
685 1, 42 | do not ~withdraw from the Son any power possessed by the
686 1, 42 | things the Father doth, the Son doth in ~like manner"; but
687 1, 42 | meaning is to show that the Son derives His power ~from
688 1, 42 | nature implies that the Son so acts ~of Himself [per
689 1, 42 | Father's "showing" and the Son's "hearing" are to be ~taken
690 1, 42 | communicates knowledge to the Son, as ~He communicates His
691 1, 42 | Father, and ~filiation in the Son: so by the same power the
692 1, 42 | the Father begets, and the Son ~is begotten. Hence it is
693 1, 42 | Hence it is clear that the Son can do whatever the Father ~
694 1, 42 | does not follow that the Son can beget; for to argue
695 1, 42 | divine relation. So the Son has the same omnipotence
696 1, 42 | able to beget; while the Son ~possesses the power of "
697 1, 43 | sent?~(5) Whether both the Son and the Holy Ghost are invisibly
698 1, 43 | existing in another; thus the Son is said to be sent ~by the
699 1, 43 | Hom. ~xxvi, in Ev.), "The Son is sent as He is begotten."
700 1, 43 | He is begotten." But the Son's ~generation is eternal.
701 1, 43 | was come, God sent His Son."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[
702 1, 43 | signification: for the Son may proceed eternally as
703 1, 43 | temporal generation of the Son, not ~from the Father, but
704 1, 43 | Trin. iv, 20) that "the Son, when ~temporally perceived
705 1, 43 | mind, is sent." But the Son is known not only ~by sanctifying
706 1, 43 | Reply OBJ 3: Although the Son can be known by us according
707 1, 43 | this can only belong to the Son and to the Holy Ghost, to ~
708 1, 43 | us by grace, just as the Son and the Holy Ghost, still
709 1, 43 | Whether it is fitting for the Son to be sent invisibly?~Aquin.:
710 1, 43 | it is not fitting for the Son to be sent ~invisibly. For
711 1, 43 | nothing." Therefore, since the Son proceeds as the word of ~
712 1, 43 | But the procession of the Son and of the Holy ~Ghost differ
713 1, 43 | Hence, since both to the Son and to ~the Holy Ghost it
714 1, 43 | in a certain way ~to the Son, those, namely, which belong
715 1, 43 | speak of the mission of the Son. Hence Augustine says (De ~
716 1, 43 | Trin. iv, 20) that "The Son is sent to anyone invisibly,
717 1, 43 | of charity. Whereas the Son is the Word, not any sort
718 1, 43 | knowledge with love." Thus the Son is sent not in ~accordance
719 1, 43 | De ~Trin. iv, 20): "The Son is sent, whenever He is
720 1, 43 | origin, in this sense the Son's mission is ~distinguished
721 1, 43 | invisible mission of the Son "is in man and with men.
722 1, 43 | Trin. iv, 20), ~that "the Son is sent to each one when
723 1, 43 | visible manner. For the Son as visibly sent to the world
724 1, 43 | visible creature, as the Son's mission according to the
725 1, 43 | 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the Son was visibly sent by reason
726 1, 43 | in different ways to the Son and to ~the Holy Ghost.
727 1, 43 | of sanctification; to the Son as the principle of the
728 1, 43 | sanctification. Thus the Son has ~been sent visibly as
729 1, 43 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Son assumed the visible creature,
730 1, 43 | creature can be said of the Son of God; and so, by reason
731 1, 43 | the nature ~assumed, the Son is called less than the
732 1, 43 | to these images that the ~Son has to the rock, because
733 1, 43 | person. For as the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are signified
734 1, 43 | It was necessary for the Son to be declared as the author ~
735 1, 43 | the visible mission of the Son was necessarily made according
736 1, 43 | spoke, "This is My beloved Son" (Mt. 3:17), that ~others
737 1, 43 | the visible mission of the Son was to be accomplished before
738 1, 43 | Holy Ghost manifests the Son, as the Son manifests ~the
739 1, 43 | manifests the Son, as the Son manifests ~the Father. Visible
740 1, 43 | 1/1~On the contrary, The Son is sent by the Holy Ghost,
741 1, 43 | and His Spirit." But the Son is not ~from the Holy Ghost.
742 1, 43 | when it is said that the Son of God is sent by the Holy
743 1, 43 | De ~Trin. ii, 5) that the Son is sent by Himself, and
744 1, 43 | sent by Himself, and by the Son; so that to be sent in ~
745 1, 43 | who is sent; and ~thus the Son is sent only by the Father;
746 1, 43 | Ghost by the Father ~and the Son. If, however, the person
747 1, 45 | and ~invisible"; to the Son is attributed that by Him "
748 1, 45 | through His Word, which is His Son; and through His Love, ~
749 1, 45 | of order, inasmuch as the Son receives ~the divine nature
750 1, 45 | a kind of order. For the Son receives it from the ~Father,
751 1, 45 | from another. And of the Son it is said (Jn. 1:3), "Through
752 1, 45 | by the Father through the Son. Again, the reason ~for
753 1, 45 | be the ~Creator. To the Son is appropriated wisdom,
754 1, 45 | said above (Q[27]). For the Son ~proceeds as the word of
755 1, 46 | the efficient cause of the son (Phys. ii, text 5). Therefore
756 1, 46 | as a man, and not as the son of another man. For ~all
757 1, 46 | is expounded - "in the Son." For as the ~efficient
758 1, 46 | principle is appropriated to the Son by reason of wisdom, in ~
759 1, 46 | beginning - that is, in the Son; according to the word of
760 1, 46 | 16), "In Him" - viz. the Son - "were created all things."
761 1, 47 | appropriated unity, the Son ~proceeds to Whom is appropriated
762 1, 51 | belongs to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, as
763 1, 51 | to that ~one whereby the Son of God appeared in the flesh.~
764 1, 61 | that, God alone, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, is from
765 1, 61 | be interpreted, "In the Son," or "In the beginning of
766 1, 64 | certainly known that He ~was the Son of God and the effect of
767 1, 73 | we read (Phil. 2:7), The Son of God "was made in the
768 1, 74 | 4), the person of ~the Son is mentioned both in the
769 1, 74 | mentioned. But in creation the Son is mentioned as the beginning, ~
770 1, 74 | Creator, the Person of the Son by the beginning, in which
771 1, 74 | speaks, and the Person of the Son by the Word in which He
772 1, 37 | Whether the Father and the Son love each other by the Holy
773 1, 37 | xv, 17): "As the Father, Son and Holy ~Ghost are called
774 1, 37 | know not ~why the Father, Son and Holy Ghost should not
775 1, 37 | from the Father and the Son, as was shown ~above (Q[
776 1, 37 | bond of the ~Father and the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[37] A[
777 1, 37 | is the proper name of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[37] A[
778 1, 37 | Love of the Father for the Son, or for something else;
779 1, 37 | bond of the Father and ~Son, inasmuch as He is Love;
780 1, 37 | Father loves Himself and ~the Son with one Love, and conversely,
781 1, 37 | relation of the Father to the Son, and conversely, as ~that
782 1, 37 | that the Father and ~the Son mutually love one another,
783 1, 37 | it does not belong to the Son, though He understands,
784 1, 37 | Whether the Father and the Son love each other by the Holy
785 1, 37 | that the Father and the Son do not love each other ~
786 1, 37 | Wisdom begotten. But as the Son is Wisdom begotten, so ~
787 1, 37 | Therefore the Father and the Son do not love Themselves by
788 1, 37 | proposition, "The Father and the Son love each other ~by the
789 1, 37 | Father understands by the Son"; nor, ~again, if it is
790 1, 37 | that "the Father and the Son spirate by the Holy Ghost,"
791 1, 37 | Father generates by the Son." Therefore in no way is
792 1, 37 | true: "'The Father and the Son love each other by the Holy ~
793 1, 37 | love the Father loves the Son, and Himself, ~and us. But
794 1, 37 | false: "The Father loves the Son by the Holy Ghost."~Aquin.:
795 1, 37 | say, "the Father loves the Son by the Holy Ghost," ~since
796 1, 37 | love to the Father and the Son; ~which cannot be admitted.~
797 1, 37 | that "the ~Father and the Son love each other by the Holy
798 1, 37 | that "the ~Father loves the Son by the Holy Ghost" - that
799 1, 37 | that the Father loves the Son"; inasmuch as ~the Holy
800 1, 37 | whereby the Father and the Son ~formally love each other.
801 1, 37 | that the Father ~and the Son love each other not by the
802 1, 37 | neither Himself, nor the Son, nor the Holy Ghost, except
803 1, 37 | Father, by the Word or the Son, speaks ~Himself, and His
804 1, 37 | that the Father and the Son love each ~other and us,
805 1, 37 | wise or intelligent by the ~Son." But to love is taken not
806 1, 37 | that the Father and the Son love each ~other by the
807 1, 37 | Ghost, or begets by the Son. But we can say that the ~
808 1, 37 | that the Father loves the Son by the Holy Ghost, as by ~
809 1, 37 | Father loves not only the Son, but also Himself and us, ~
810 1, 38 | the Father gives to the Son, as Hilary ~says (De Trin.
811 1, 38 | eternity; as "Father," and "Son." Therefore "Gift" is not
812 1, 38 | either by origin, as the Son belongs to the ~Father;
813 1, 38 | only; and in this sense the Son is the Father's; and the
814 1, 38 | But, as Is. 9:16 says: "A Son ~is give to us." Therefore
815 1, 38 | to be Gift belongs to the Son, as well as to ~the Holy
816 1, 38 | to be born' is, ~for the Son, to be from the Father,
817 1, 38 | proceed from Father and Son." But the Holy Ghost ~receives
818 1, 38 | proceeds from Father and ~Son. Therefore Gift is the proper
819 1, 38 | 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: As the Son is properly called the Image
820 1, 38 | called Gift, although the Son, too, is given. For that
821 1, 38 | is given. For that the Son is given ~is from the Father'
822 1, 38 | to give His only begotten Son" (Jn. 3:16).~Aquin.: SMT
823 1, 39 | Synod.) that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost ~"are indeed
824 1, 39 | never says that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are of one
825 1, 39 | predicated of the Father and the Son signifies either one ~subsistent,
826 1, 39 | proper to both Father and Son."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
827 1, 39 | future glory are the Father, Son and Holy Ghost." ~Therefore
828 1, 39 | do ~not say the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are "three
829 1, 39 | properties in the Father, Son and Holy Ghost - it is ~
830 1, 39 | not beget," ~because the Son does not beget. Therefore
831 1, 39 | name to the person of the Son, and hence the ~phrase means
832 1, 39 | belonging to the person of the Son, this ~proposition, for
833 1, 39 | the ~generator" and the "Son is God the non-generator"
834 1, 39 | for the Father and the Son are one God, ~as was said
835 1, 39 | God," because although the Son is another than the Father,
836 1, 39 | befitting to the person of the Son; and in the negative sense ~
837 1, 39 | is to be removed from the Son's divinity ~as well as from
838 1, 39 | 2): "The Father and the Son are one ~Wisdom, because
839 1, 39 | what is within us. But the Son is generated. Therefore ~
840 1, 39 | divine essence is in the Son, it seems that the divine
841 1, 39 | take the sense to be, "the Son" who is essence and wisdom,
842 1, 39 | the ~divine nature in the Son is not begotten either directly
843 1, 39 | the Trinity; nor is the Son; nor is the Holy Ghost.
844 1, 39 | essence is the Father, and the Son, and the ~Holy Ghost." And
845 1, 39 | are appropriated to the Son, Who proceeds by way of ~
846 1, 39 | Him, as though only the Son were Wisdom; so ~that the
847 1, 39 | that the Father and the Son together only can be called
848 1, 39 | the ~Father without the Son. But the Son is called the
849 1, 39 | without the Son. But the Son is called the Wisdom of
850 1, 39 | name "Image" proper to the Son ~(Q[35], A[2]), and the
851 1, 39 | Father, "species" to the Son, and ~"use" to the Holy
852 1, 39 | Father, equality in the Son, and in the Holy Ghost is
853 1, 39 | Father; all are equal by the Son, and all united by the Holy ~
854 1, 39 | attributed ~"power," to the Son "wisdom," to the Holy Ghost "
855 1, 39 | to be appropriated to the Son, according to the text, "
856 1, 39 | Father, ~'by Him' to the Son, 'in Him' to the Holy Ghost.'"
857 1, 39 | Truth is appropriated to the Son, according to Jn. ~14:6, "
858 1, 39 | Gentiles," a gloss adds, "The Son speaks Who said to Moses,
859 1, 39 | appear to belong to the Son, and are not appropriated. ~
860 1, 39 | properly belongs to the Son, Who has a principle. Also
861 1, 39 | life" seems proper to the Son, as signifying "a thing
862 1, 39 | appears to be ~proper to the Son; because if when it was
863 1, 39 | said, "He Who is Father, Son, ~and Holy Ghost, and the
864 1, 39 | Who is the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost sent ~
865 1, 39 | because no person is Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Therefore
866 1, 39 | Trinity, but is proper to the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[39] A[
867 1, 39 | Father, "species" to ~the Son, "use" to the Holy Ghost.
868 1, 39 | to ~the property of the Son. For beauty includes three
869 1, 39 | likeness to the property of the Son, inasmuch ~as He as Son
870 1, 39 | Son, inasmuch ~as He as Son has in Himself truly and
871 1, 39 | Where - that is, in the Son - there is supreme and primal
872 1, 39 | The second agrees with the Son's property, inasmuch as
873 1, 39 | with the property of the Son, as the Word, which is the ~
874 1, 39 | whereby the Father and the Son enjoy each other, agrees ~
875 1, 39 | Father, ~"equality" to the Son, "concord" or "union" to
876 1, 39 | equality is appropriated to the Son, Who is the ~"principle
877 1, 39 | are equal by reason of the Son; and are united by reason
878 1, 39 | as soon as we suppose the Son. So, all are equal by reason
879 1, 39 | are equal by reason of the Son, not as if the ~Son were
880 1, 39 | the Son, not as if the ~Son were the principle of equality
881 1, 39 | but that, without the ~Son equal to the Father, the
882 1, 39 | firstly in regard to the Son: for that the ~Holy Ghost
883 1, 39 | Father, is also from the Son. Likewise, if the ~Holy
884 1, 39 | between the Father and the Son. So ~all are connected by
885 1, 39 | whence the Father and the Son are said to be united.~Aquin.:
886 1, 39 | likeness to the heavenly Son, as the ~Word, for a word
887 1, 39 | of wisdom. In an earthly son ~this is sometimes absent
888 1, 39 | is appropriated to the Son and to the ~Holy Ghost,
889 1, 39 | always appropriated to the Son, but ~belongs to the Son
890 1, 39 | Son, but ~belongs to the Son properly and strictly, according
891 1, 39 | Jn. 1:3); not that the Son is an instrument, ~but as "
892 1, 39 | are appropriated to ~the Son, so also is the expression "
893 1, 39 | should be appropriated to the Son. In another sense things
894 1, 39 | is ~appropriated to the Son, without, however, being
895 1, 39 | as ~appropriated to the Son. The "book of life" directly
896 1, 39 | it is appropriated to the Son; although life is ~appropriated
897 1, 39 | appropriated to the person of the Son, not by ~reason of itself,
898 1, 39 | race accomplished by ~the Son. Yet, forasmuch as the word "
899 1, 39 | relate to the person of the Son; and in that sense it ~would
900 1, 39 | instance, were we to say, "The Son is ~the begotten 'Who is,'"
901 1, 40 | in the Father and in ~the Son. Therefore relation is not
902 1, 40 | Himself, ~and filiation is the Son, and procession is the Holy
903 1, 40 | Father, and the person of the Son; not that it is one self-subsisting ~
904 1, 40 | is distinguished from the Son, inasmuch as the former ~
905 1, 40 | Father, and filiation is the Son, because in God the ~abstract
906 1, 40 | it would follow that the Son, in ~Whom there is not paternity,
907 1, 40 | Father had not begotten the Son, nothing would ~prevent
908 1, 40 | He had not begotten the Son, ~there would be no paternity
909 1, 40 | says (De Trin. iv): "The Son has nothing else ~than birth."
910 1, 40 | than birth." But He is Son by "birth." Therefore, if
911 1, 40 | filiation be ~removed, the Son's hypostasis no more remains;
912 1, 40 | not from another, and the Son is a ~hypostasis as from
913 1, 40 | follow, however, ~that the Son is not "someone" or a hypostasis;
914 1, 40 | He is ever begetting the Son." So it seems ~that generation
915 1, 40 | presupposes nativity; for the Son is so called ~because He
916 1, 40 | attributed to the Father and the Son; passive, as ~nativity is
917 1, 40 | nativity is attributed to the Son, and procession to the Holy
918 1, 40 | common to the Father and the ~Son. The personal property of
919 1, 40 | way to the person of the Son; and so, in ~the order of
920 1, 40 | constituting ~the person of the Son. But active generation signifies
921 1, 41 | the Father to beget the Son." Therefore notional acts ~
922 1, 41 | with the Father, and to the Son "to be begotten."~Aquin.:
923 1, 41 | Father led to beget ~the Son."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
924 1, 41 | us to the kingdom of ~the Son of His love" (Col. 1:13).
925 1, 41 | the will. Therefore ~the Son was begotten of the Father
926 1, 41 | from the Father and the Son. Therefore He proceeds ~
927 1, 41 | 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the Son proceeds by mode of the
928 1, 41 | a speaker. Therefore the Son ~proceeds from the Father
929 1, 41 | if the ~Father begot the Son, not by the will, it seems
930 1, 41 | the Father ~begot the Son neither by will, nor by
931 1, 41 | that ~the Father begot the Son by will; as also He is God
932 1, 41 | and wills to beget the Son. In the other sense, the ~
933 1, 41 | God the Father begot the Son, not ~by His will; but that
934 1, 41 | If anyone say that the Son was made by the ~Will of
935 1, 41 | Arians, wishing to prove the Son to be a creature, said that ~
936 1, 41 | that ~the Father begot the Son by will, taking will in
937 1, 41 | that the Father begot the Son, not ~by will, but by nature.
938 1, 41 | but perfect birth gave the Son ~a nature derived from a
939 1, 41 | willed them to be; but the Son, born of God, ~subsists
940 1, 41 | in the generation of the Son, ~for they said that the
941 1, 41 | that the Father begot the Son in such a manner by nature ~
942 1, 41 | did the Father beget the Son."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
943 1, 41 | Apostle calls Christ the Son of the love of God, ~inasmuch
944 1, 41 | were the principle of the Son's generation.~Aquin.: SMT
945 1, 41 | that the ~Father beget the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
946 1, 41 | if the Father begets the Son from something, this will
947 1, 41 | the Father exists in the Son, and this ~contradicts what
948 1, 41 | If the Father begets the Son from ~Himself, since again
949 1, 41 | does not remain after the ~Son is begotten, or that the
950 1, 41 | or that the Father is the Son, which is false. Therefore ~
951 1, 41 | Father does not beget the Son from something, but from
952 1, 41 | the Father generate the Son from His ~own essence or
953 1, 41 | is the principle of the Son. But it is not a material
954 1, 41 | person. But the person of the Son is not another thing from
955 1, 41 | s essence. Therefore the Son is not from the Father's
956 1, 41 | nothing. But in Scripture the Son ~is called a creature; for
957 1, 41 | created." Therefore the Son was not begotten from something, ~
958 1, 41 | without beginning, begot the Son equal to ~Himself."~Aquin.:
959 1, 41 | 1/2~I answer that, The Son was not begotten from nothing,
960 1, 41 | proceeds from another as a son, and "making," that the
961 1, 41 | whereas a man begets a son from himself. Now, as a
962 1, 41 | presupposed. So, ~were the Son to proceed from the Father
963 1, 41 | out of nothing, then the Son ~would be to the Father
964 1, 41 | similitude. Thus, if the Son of God proceeds from the
965 1, 41 | properly and truly called the Son, whereas the ~contrary is
966 1, 41 | That we may be in His true Son Jesus ~Christ." Therefore
967 1, 41 | Christ." Therefore the true Son of God is not from nothing;
968 1, 41 | assimilation to Him Who is the true Son. Whence, as He is the only ~
969 1, 41 | the only ~true and natural Son of God, He is called the "
970 1, 41 | 1:18, "The only begotten Son, Who is in the bosom of
971 1, 41 | conformable ~to the image of His Son, that He might be the first
972 1, 41 | brethren." Therefore the Son of God is begotten of the
973 1, 41 | Father in begetting the Son does not ~transmit any part
974 1, 41 | 1: When we say that the Son was born of the Father,
975 1, 41 | Reply OBJ 2: When we say the Son is begotten of the essence
976 1, 41 | and as he expounds, ~"the Son is begotten of the essence
977 1, 41 | active principle, as the ~son is said to be "of" the father,
978 1, 41 | then, we say that ~the Son is begotten 'of' the essence
979 1, 41 | generation, subsists in the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
980 1, 41 | 3: When we say that the Son is begotten of the essence
981 1, 41 | not of Wisdom which is the Son of God, but of created wisdom
982 1, 41 | created nature assumed by the Son, so that the sense be, "
983 1, 41 | Creator's nature. Thus the ~Son is called both created and
984 1, 41 | nature in the Father and the Son. In this way ~Hilary expounds
985 1, 41 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the Son proceeds as the word, which
986 1, 41 | could not beget a co-equal Son, where is the omnipotence
987 1, 41 | and the Father and the Son to be the principle of spiration,
988 1, 41 | spiration to the Father and the Son; for the power of generation
989 1, 41 | is it possible ~that the Son should be generated.~Aquin.:
990 1, 41 | has the power to beget the Son, so also He wills ~to beget
991 1, 41 | Body Para. 2/3~Now the Son of God is like the Father,
992 1, 41 | divine nature, in ~which the Son is like to Him. And in this
993 1, 41 | begetting can beget. But the Son has ~the power of begetting.
994 1, 41 | therefore He can beget another son. Therefore there can be ~
995 1, 41 | Contra Maxim. iii, 12): "The Son did not ~beget a Creator:
996 1, 41 | diminished after ~begetting the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[41] A[
997 1, 41 | is only "one Father, one ~Son, one Holy Ghost." For this
998 1, 41 | word, which person is ~the Son; and but one person proceeding
999 1, 41 | For this reason is the Son perfect, that the entire
1000 1, 41 | and that there is but one Son. The argument is similar ~
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2380 |