1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2380
Part, Question
1001 1, 41 | without distinction, that the Son has the ~same power as the
1002 1, 41 | we cannot grant that the Son has the power ~"generandi" [
1003 1, 41 | sense would be that the Son has the "power to ~beget."
1004 1, 41 | as, although Father and Son have the same being, it
1005 1, 41 | does not ~follow that the Son is the Father, by reason
1006 1, 41 | power "generandi" is in the Son - that is, the ~power of
1007 1, 41 | by those words that the Son ~could beget a Son: but
1008 1, 41 | that the Son ~could beget a Son: but that if He did not,
1009 1, 42 | equal to the image." But the Son is the image of the Father; ~
1010 1, 42 | Father is not equal to the Son. Therefore equality is not
1011 1, 42 | equality to be in the Father, ~Son and Holy Ghost, inasmuch
1012 1, 42 | nature in both Father and Son, but also is it in both
1013 1, 42 | we say not only that the Son is like to the ~Father,
1014 1, 42 | so is likeness; for the Son is equal ~and like to the
1015 1, 42 | more the Father's than the Son's. Wherefore, just as the ~
1016 1, 42 | Wherefore, just as the ~Son has the greatness of the
1017 1, 42 | has the greatness of the Son, and is therefore ~equal
1018 1, 42 | therefore ~equal to the Son. But in reference to creatures,
1019 1, 42 | receives. Since, therefore, the Son ~receives from the Father,
1020 1, 42 | this reason we say that the Son is equalled to ~the Father,
1021 1, 42 | with His principle, as the ~Son with the Father?~Aquin.:
1022 1, 42 | with ~His principle, as the Son with the Father. For Arius
1023 1, 42 | is not predicated of the Son as the ~genus of a species.
1024 1, 42 | from another. So if the Son ~is from the Father, we
1025 1, 42 | principle. Therefore the Son is not eternal; nor is ~
1026 1, 42 | generation is ~existence. But the Son is generated by the Father.
1027 1, 42 | 1~OBJ 4: Further, if the Son be begotten by the Father,
1028 1, 42 | motion, it follows that the Son must be always imperfect,
1029 1, 42 | for the begetting of the Son, and before that ~moment
1030 1, 42 | before that ~moment the Son did not exist.~Aquin.: SMT
1031 1, 42 | that, We must say that the Son is co-eternal with the Father. ~
1032 1, 42 | Father does not beget the ~Son by will, but by nature;
1033 1, 42 | the Father produces the ~Son is not successive, because
1034 1, 42 | successive, because thus the Son would be successively ~generated,
1035 1, 42 | Therefore we conclude that the Son ~existed whensoever the
1036 1, 42 | Father existed and thus the Son is co-eternal with ~the
1037 1, 42 | thee that the co-eternal Son existed always with the
1038 1, 42 | His birth; let the name Son insinuate ~His consubstantiality."
1039 1, 42 | Q[27], A[2]). Hence the Son is ever being ~begotten,
1040 1, 42 | But the generation of the Son is not in ~the "now" of
1041 1, 42 | therefore, neither is the Son ~imperfect, nor "was there
1042 1, 42 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son is equal to the Father in
1043 1, 42 | It would seem that the Son is not equal to the Father
1044 1, 42 | says (1 Cor. 15:28): "The Son Himself shall be ~subject
1045 1, 42 | does not belong to the Son. Therefore the Son does
1046 1, 42 | to the Son. Therefore the Son does not possess all the ~
1047 1, 42 | three notions, while in the Son there are only two, the ~
1048 1, 42 | there are only two, the ~Son is evidently not equal to
1049 1, 42 | 1/1~I answer that, The Son is necessarily equal to
1050 1, 42 | paternity and filiation that the Son ~by generation should attain
1051 1, 42 | defective, nor that the Son of God arrived at perfection
1052 1, 42 | Therefore we must say that the Son was eternally ~equal to
1053 1, 42 | shortcomings, then every son, by reason of his natural ~
1054 1, 42 | and (De Synod.): "The ~Son subjects Himself by His
1055 1, 42 | Father is paternity, in the Son is filiation, so ~the same
1056 1, 42 | Father is paternity, in the Son is ~filiation. It is thus
1057 1, 42 | thus true to say that the Son possesses whatever dignity ~
1058 1, 42 | paternity, ~therefore the Son has paternity," for there
1059 1, 42 | For the Father and the Son have the same essence ~and
1060 1, 42 | relation of giver, and in ~the Son by relation of receiver.~
1061 1, 42 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son is in the Father, and conversely?~
1062 1, 42 | It would seem that the Son and the Father are not in
1063 1, 42 | to none of which is the Son in the Father, ~or conversely;
1064 1, 42 | each mode. Therefore ~the Son and the Father are not in
1065 1, 42 | another is within. But ~the Son from eternity came out from
1066 1, 42 | eternity." ~Therefore the Son is not in the Father.~Aquin.:
1067 1, 42 | be in the other. But the Son ~and the Father are relatively
1068 1, 42 | regards the ~Father and the Son; the essence, the relation
1069 1, 42 | and ~according to each the Son and the Father are in each
1070 1, 42 | other. The Father is ~in the Son by His essence, forasmuch
1071 1, 42 | communicates His essence to the Son not by any change on His
1072 1, 42 | Father's essence is in the Son, the Father Himself ~is
1073 1, 42 | Father Himself ~is in the Son; likewise, since the Son
1074 1, 42 | Son; likewise, since the Son is His own essence, it follows ~
1075 1, 42 | the Philosopher, are the Son and the Father in each other. ~
1076 1, 42 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The Son's going forth from the Father
1077 1, 42 | OBJ 3: The Father and the Son are relatively opposed,
1078 1, 42 | Thes. Para. 1/1~Whether the Son is equal to the Father in
1079 1, 42 | It would seem that the Son is not equal to the Father
1080 1, 42 | is said (Jn. 5:19): "The Son cannot do anything of Himself
1081 1, 42 | power is greater than the Son's.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42]
1082 1, 42 | the Father commands the Son ~according to Jn. 14:31: "
1083 1, 42 | Father also teaches the Son: "The Father loveth the
1084 1, 42 | The Father loveth the Son, and showeth Him ~all things
1085 1, 42 | doth" (Jn. 5:20). Also, the Son hears: "As I ~hear, so I
1086 1, 42 | greater power than ~the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[42] A[
1087 1, 42 | omnipotence to be able to ~beget a Son equal to Himself. For Augustine
1088 1, 42 | God the Father?" But the Son cannot beget a Son, as proved ~
1089 1, 42 | But the Son cannot beget a Son, as proved ~above (Q[41],
1090 1, 42 | 41], A[6]). Therefore the Son cannot do all that belongs
1091 1, 42 | Father ~doth, these the Son also doth in like manner."~
1092 1, 42 | 1/1~I answer that, The Son is necessarily equal to
1093 1, 42 | filiation requires that the Son should be the ~Father's
1094 1, 42 | Hence it ~follows that the Son is equal to the Father in
1095 1, 42 | Reply OBJ 1: The words, "the Son cannot of Himself do anything,"
1096 1, 42 | do not ~withdraw from the Son any power possessed by the
1097 1, 42 | things the Father doth, the Son doth in ~like manner"; but
1098 1, 42 | meaning is to show that the Son derives His power ~from
1099 1, 42 | nature implies that the Son so acts ~of Himself [per
1100 1, 42 | Father's "showing" and the Son's "hearing" are to be ~taken
1101 1, 42 | communicates knowledge to the Son, as ~He communicates His
1102 1, 42 | Father, and ~filiation in the Son: so by the same power the
1103 1, 42 | the Father begets, and the Son ~is begotten. Hence it is
1104 1, 42 | Hence it is clear that the Son can do whatever the Father ~
1105 1, 42 | does not follow that the Son can beget; for to argue
1106 1, 42 | divine relation. So the Son has the same omnipotence
1107 1, 42 | able to beget; while the Son ~possesses the power of "
1108 1, 43 | sent?~(5) Whether both the Son and the Holy Ghost are invisibly
1109 1, 43 | existing in another; thus the Son is said to be sent ~by the
1110 1, 43 | Hom. ~xxvi, in Ev.), "The Son is sent as He is begotten."
1111 1, 43 | He is begotten." But the Son's ~generation is eternal.
1112 1, 43 | was come, God sent His Son."~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[43] A[
1113 1, 43 | signification: for the Son may proceed eternally as
1114 1, 43 | temporal generation of the Son, not ~from the Father, but
1115 1, 43 | Trin. iv, 20) that "the Son, when ~temporally perceived
1116 1, 43 | mind, is sent." But the Son is known not only ~by sanctifying
1117 1, 43 | Reply OBJ 3: Although the Son can be known by us according
1118 1, 43 | this can only belong to the Son and to the Holy Ghost, to ~
1119 1, 43 | us by grace, just as the Son and the Holy Ghost, still
1120 1, 43 | Whether it is fitting for the Son to be sent invisibly?~Aquin.:
1121 1, 43 | it is not fitting for the Son to be sent ~invisibly. For
1122 1, 43 | nothing." Therefore, since the Son proceeds as the word of ~
1123 1, 43 | But the procession of the Son and of the Holy ~Ghost differ
1124 1, 43 | Hence, since both to the Son and to ~the Holy Ghost it
1125 1, 43 | in a certain way ~to the Son, those, namely, which belong
1126 1, 43 | speak of the mission of the Son. Hence Augustine says (De ~
1127 1, 43 | Trin. iv, 20) that "The Son is sent to anyone invisibly,
1128 1, 43 | of charity. Whereas the Son is the Word, not any sort
1129 1, 43 | knowledge with love." Thus the Son is sent not in ~accordance
1130 1, 43 | De ~Trin. iv, 20): "The Son is sent, whenever He is
1131 1, 43 | origin, in this sense the Son's mission is ~distinguished
1132 1, 43 | invisible mission of the Son "is in man and with men.
1133 1, 43 | Trin. iv, 20), ~that "the Son is sent to each one when
1134 1, 43 | visible manner. For the Son as visibly sent to the world
1135 1, 43 | visible creature, as the Son's mission according to the
1136 1, 43 | 1/1~OBJ 4: Further, the Son was visibly sent by reason
1137 1, 43 | in different ways to the Son and to ~the Holy Ghost.
1138 1, 43 | of sanctification; to the Son as the principle of the
1139 1, 43 | sanctification. Thus the Son has been sent visibly as
1140 1, 43 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The Son assumed the visible creature,
1141 1, 43 | creature can be said of the Son of God; and so, by reason
1142 1, 43 | the nature ~assumed, the Son is called less than the
1143 1, 43 | to these images that the ~Son has to the rock, because
1144 1, 43 | person. For as the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are signified
1145 1, 43 | It was necessary for the Son to be declared as the author ~
1146 1, 43 | visible mission of the ~Son was necessarily made according
1147 1, 43 | spoke, "This is My beloved Son" (Mt. 3:17), that ~others
1148 1, 43 | the visible mission of the Son was to be accomplished before
1149 1, 43 | Holy Ghost manifests the Son, as the Son manifests ~the
1150 1, 43 | manifests the Son, as the Son manifests ~the Father. Visible
1151 1, 43 | 1/1~On the contrary, The Son is sent by the Holy Ghost,
1152 1, 43 | and His Spirit." But the Son is not ~from the Holy Ghost.
1153 1, 43 | when it is said that the Son of God is sent by the Holy
1154 1, 43 | De ~Trin. ii, 5) that the Son is sent by Himself, and
1155 1, 43 | sent by Himself, and by the Son; so that to be sent in ~
1156 1, 43 | who is sent; and ~thus the Son is sent only by the Father;
1157 1, 43 | Ghost by the Father ~and the Son. If, however, the person
1158 1, 46 | and ~invisible"; to the Son is attributed that by Him "
1159 1, 46 | through His Word, which is His Son; and through His Love, ~
1160 1, 46 | of order, inasmuch as the Son receives ~the divine nature
1161 1, 46 | a kind of order. For the Son receives it from the ~Father,
1162 1, 46 | from another. And of the Son it is said (Jn. 1:3), "Through
1163 1, 46 | by the Father through the Son. Again, the reason ~for
1164 1, 46 | be the ~Creator. To the Son is appropriated wisdom,
1165 1, 46 | said above (Q[27]). For the Son ~proceeds as the word of
1166 1, 47 | the efficient cause of the son (Phys. ii, text 5). Therefore
1167 1, 47 | as a man, and not as the son of another man. For ~all
1168 1, 47 | is expounded - "in the Son." For as the ~efficient
1169 1, 47 | principle is appropriated to the Son by reason of wisdom, in ~
1170 1, 47 | beginning - that is, in the Son; according to the word of
1171 1, 47 | 16), "In Him" - viz. the Son - "were created all things."
1172 1, 48 | appropriated unity, the Son ~proceeds to Whom is appropriated
1173 1, 52 | belongs to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, as
1174 1, 52 | to that ~one whereby the Son of God appeared in the flesh.~
1175 1, 62 | that, God alone, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, is from
1176 1, 62 | be interpreted, "In the Son," or "In the beginning of
1177 1, 65 | certainly known that He ~was the Son of God and the effect of
1178 1, 72 | we read (Phil. 2:7), The Son of God "was made in the
1179 1, 73 | 4), the person of ~the Son is mentioned both in the
1180 1, 73 | mentioned. But in creation the Son is mentioned as the beginning, ~
1181 1, 73 | Creator, the Person of the Son by the beginning, in which
1182 1, 73 | speaks, and the Person of the Son by the Word in which He
1183 1, 87 | perfect image of God, as ~the Son is the perfect image of
1184 1, 92 | exists in His first-born ~Son; as the image of the king
1185 1, 92 | image of the king is in his son, who is of the same nature
1186 1, 92 | the king exists in ~his son: or, at least, in some specific
1187 1, 92 | conformable to the image of His Son." But all men ~are not predestined.
1188 1, 92 | Persons, but only to the Son; for Augustine says (De
1189 1, 92 | Trin. vi, 2) that ~"the Son alone is the image of the
1190 1, 92 | Trinity, but only of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[93] A[
1191 1, 92 | there is an image of the Son ~only. Augustine rejects
1192 1, 92 | First, because ~as the Son is like to the Father by
1193 1, 92 | made in likeness to the Son, that he is ~made to the
1194 1, 92 | only to the image of the Son, the Father would not have
1195 1, 92 | man to the image of the Son only, Who is God, as ~some
1196 1, 92 | denote the person of the Son; and that the woman is a
1197 1, 92 | from man as not to be ~his son or daughter." All of this
1198 1, 92 | is the principle of the Son, as the ~woman is the principle
1199 1, 92 | reasons the procession of the Son from the Father alone is
1200 1, 92 | from the Father and the Son is ~not thus properly represented.~
1201 1, 95 | father naturally ~loves his son more than a brother loves
1202 1, 95 | his brother; although the son ~does not love his father
1203 1, 111 | he ~already was. Thus the Son, or the Holy Ghost is said
1204 1, 116 | hath spoken to us by His Son." Therefore some men have
1205 1, 118 | 1/1~OBJ 2: Further, the son is like his father, in respect
1206 2, 2 | written (Mk. 8:38): "The Son of Man shall confess him
1207 2, 16 | the Image," i.e. in the Son, "Use in the Gift," i.e. ~
1208 2, 19 | death of a father: if ~his son were to will it also, it
1209 2, 19 | e.g. the thief's wife ~or son, who wishes him not to be
1210 2, 65 | unto the fellowship of His Son." Now this fellowship of
1211 2, 67 | according to ~Lk. 16:25: "Son, remember that thou didst
1212 2, 69 | palace belongs to the king's son.~
1213 2, 73 | according to Micah 7:6: "the son ~dishonoreth the father,
1214 2, 81 | written (Ezech. 18:20): ~"The son shall not bear the iniquity
1215 2, 81 | be the father of a gouty son, ~on account of some seminal
1216 2, 81 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: The son is said not to bear the
1217 2, 81 | of origin from father to son, even as actual sin is transmitted ~
1218 2, 81 | does not ~transmit to his son the knowledge of grammar
1219 2, 81 | a man with eyes begets a son having eyes, ~unless nature
1220 2, 87 | if it be replied that the son is punished, not for the ~
1221 2, 87 | written (Ezech. 18:20): "The son shall not bear ~the iniquity
1222 2, 87 | as regards the soul, the son is not the father's ~property.
1223 2, 88 | that believeth not the ~Son, shall not see life," says (
1224 2, 93 | it is appropriated to the Son, on account of the kinship ~
1225 2, 93 | the ~King's law. Now the Son, according to 1 Cor. 15:
1226 2, 93 | Kingdom to Him." Therefore the Son, Who is eternal, is subject
1227 2, 93 | 1/2~Reply OBJ 2: God the Son was not made by God, but
1228 2, 93 | the law, as neither is the Son, as stated above (A[4],
1229 2, 94 | Abraham to slay his innocent son (Gn. 22:2); and when he ~
1230 2, 98 | hath spoken to us by His Son," ~whereas in the Old Testament "
1231 2, 98 | Vulg.: 'sending'] His own Son . . . ~that the justification
1232 2, 100 | indebted to someone. Now a son's debt to ~his father is
1233 2, 100 | being in respect of his son. ~Therefore the precept
1234 2, 100 | Abraham consented to slay his son, ~he did not consent to
1235 2, 100 | consent to murder, because his son was due to be slain by the ~
1236 2, 100 | anyone that shall expiate his son ~or daughter, making them
1237 2, 102 | chief is that He gave His Son; wherefore it is ~written (
1238 2, 102 | give His only-begotten ~Son; that whosoever believeth
1239 2, 102 | commanded Abraham to "offer" his son ~"for a holocaust upon one
1240 2, 102 | Testaments: or of the Father and Son: or of the two ~natures
1241 2, 102 | passed on from father to son. Again, they were commanded
1242 2, 103 | shall conceive and bear a son," where the verbs are in
1243 2, 104 | order of the father to his son; of ~the wife to her husband;
1244 2, 105 | succession from ~father to son: and this, in order that
1245 2, 105 | When a man dieth without a son, his inheritance shall pass
1246 2, 105 | 21:18, seqq.) the unruly son is commanded to ~be stoned
1247 2, 105 | in the first place, the son; secondly, the daughter;
1248 2, 105 | for its wool." The ~unruly son was slain, not because he
1249 2, 105 | Iss 56:3): "Let not the son of the stranger that adhereth
1250 2, 105 | that of the father over his son (Polit. i, 3). But the dominion
1251 2, 105 | father has power over his son. But he who has power ~over
1252 2, 105 | father should bring ~his son to the ancients of the city
1253 2, 105 | be to his master, and a son to his father. But the Law
1254 2, 105 | servant to his master, or by a son to his father. Therefore
1255 2, 105 | and those of father and son: and in respect of all these ~
1256 2, 105 | not be detrimental to his son (Dt. 21:15, seqq.). Again,
1257 2, 105 | poverty a ~man might sell his son or daughter. This is shown
1258 2, 105 | might sell not only his son, but even himself, rather
1259 2, 105 | Lord commanded the stubborn son to be punished by the rulers
1260 2, 105 | this does not apply to a son in ~respect of his father,
1261 2, 106 | hath trodden underfoot the Son of God," etc.? Therefore
1262 2, 106 | adds: ~"God sending His own Son, in the likeness of sinful
1263 2, 106 | Father is distinct from the Son and the Son ~from the Father,
1264 2, 106 | distinct from the Son and the Son ~from the Father, so is
1265 2, 106 | from the Father and the ~Son. But there was a state corresponding
1266 2, 106 | corresponding to the Person of ~the Son: viz. the state of the New
1267 2, 106 | which is appropriated to the Son) hold a prominent place. ~
1268 2, 106 | Father, but also ~to the Son: because Christ was foreshadowed
1269 2, 107 | God sending His own Son in ~the likeness of sinful
1270 2, 108 | this grace through ~God's Son made man, Whose humanity
1271 2, 109 | he who is ~corrected is a son of promise, in such sort
1272 2, 109 | with the Father and the Son, ~moves and protects us.~
1273 2, 111 | graced us in His beloved son." And with regard to the ~
1274 2, 113 | Scripture warned us thus: "'My son, hast thou sinned? do so
1275 2, 114 | Nature, is adopted as a son of God, to whom the inheritance
1276 2, 1 | same things as to know the ~Son, according to Jn. 14:9: "
1277 2, 1 | article about the Father and Son, ~and, for the same reason,
1278 2, 1 | than the Person of ~the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.
1279 2, 1 | about the Person of the Son. ~Therefore there should
1280 2, 1 | appropriated to the Person of the Son, in respect of His ~Godhead.
1281 2, 1 | work appropriated to ~the Son in respect of His Godhead.~
1282 2, 1 | knowledge of the Father, Son, and Holy ~Ghost, as to
1283 2, 1 | include knowledge ~of the Son, for He would not be Father,
1284 2, 1 | be Father, had He not a Son; the bond ~whereof being
1285 2, 1 | but did ~not believe the Son to be co-equal and consubstantial
1286 2, 1 | about the Person of the Son in order to ~settle this
1287 2, 1 | OBJ 4: It belongs to the Son and Holy Ghost to be sent
1288 2, 1 | about the Persons of the Son and Holy ~Ghost than about
1289 2, 1 | is ~appropriated to the Son: so that each work belongs
1290 2, 1 | different aspects, both to the Son and to the Holy Ghost.~Aquin.:
1291 2, 2 | Trin. xv, 16) that "the Son of ~God is not called the
1292 2, 2 | sons, that ~David was the son of Jesse, and so forth.~
1293 2, 2 | testimony, that this is the ~Son of God" (Jn. 1:34). Hence
1294 2, 2 | Christ ~includes that the Son of God took flesh; that
1295 2, 2 | of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy ~Ghost."~
1296 2, 6 | Jesus ~said to him, Thy son liveth; and himself believed,
1297 2, 8 | the incarnation of God the Son; whereas other ~things come
1298 2, 10 | trodden under foot ~the Son of God, and hath esteemed
1299 2, 10 | from the Person ~of God the Son. Now the heathens deny the
1300 2, 10 | have ~peace, unless his son Absalom had been killed
1301 2, 10 | For she will turn away thy son from following Me."~Aquin.:
1302 2, 10 | be made to cease, when a son is ~set at liberty; whereas
1303 2, 10 | according to the natural law, a son, before ~coming to the use
1304 2, 13 | with the sin against ~the Son of Man (Mt. 12:32). Therefore
1305 2, 13 | the blasphemy ~against the Son of Man (Mt. 12:32), for
1306 2, 13 | speaking ~blasphemy against the Son of Man, when they said (
1307 2, 13 | of the Father and of the Son. Nor did Our Lord say this
1308 2, 13 | Father, and wisdom to the ~Son. Hence they say that when
1309 2, 13 | it is a sin ~"against the Son"; and that when he sins
1310 2, 13 | with blasphemy against the Son of Man, ~forasmuch as He
1311 2, 13 | forasmuch as He is also the Son of God, i.e. the "power
1312 2, 13 | sense, the sin against ~the Son of Man will be that which
1313 2, 13 | to blasphemy against the Son rather than ~against the
1314 2, 13 | who blasphemed against the Son of Man before ~His Godhead
1315 2, 18 | Further, the relation of son to father differs from that
1316 2, 18 | fear, which is that of the son in comparison with his father,
1317 2, 18 | contrary, ~the relation of a son to his father or of a wife
1318 2, 18 | husband is based ~on the son's affection towards his
1319 2, 18 | filial ~fear, whereby a son fears to offend his father
1320 2, 19 | of this than that God's Son should deign to unite Himself
1321 2, 22 | unto the fellowship ~of His Son." The love which is based
1322 2, 23 | love of the Father and the Son, and the participation of
1323 2, 25 | a man ought to love his son more than his ~father ?~(
1324 2, 25 | father is not part of his son, so that the love of a father
1325 2, 25 | the more exalted good, the son naturally loves his ~father
1326 2, 35 | brethren, I am a ~Pharisee, the son of Pharisees, concerning
1327 2, 38 | says in a sermon on the son of the centurion ~[*Ep.
1328 2, 43 | only-begotten and natural Son of God, according to Rm.
1329 2, 43 | conformable to the image of His Son," Who is ~Wisdom Begotten.
1330 2, 43 | likeness of the natural Son, Who is the Begotten Wisdom.~
1331 2, 55 | regards ~human affairs, a son belongs to his father, since
1332 2, 55 | father is not compared to his son as to another ~simply, and
1333 2, 55 | from her husband, than a son from his ~father, or a slave
1334 2, 55 | than between father and son, or master and slave, because,
1335 2, 55 | since what ~belongs to the son is his father's, and what
1336 2, 55 | not justice of ~father to son, or of master to slave.~
1337 2, 55 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: A son, as such, belongs to his
1338 2, 55 | relations of father ~to his son, and of a master to his
1339 2, 56 | husband and wife, father and son, master and slave," in each
1340 2, 58 | 2:12), and Phinees the son of Eleazar in slaying Zambri
1341 2, 58 | Eleazar in slaying Zambri the son of Salu ~(Num. 25:7-14),
1342 2, 58 | nevertheless the high-priest's son, and this judgment was his
1343 2, 62 | willing to ~slay his innocent son. Therefore one may, without
1344 2, 63 | spareth the rod ~hateth his son," and further on (Prov.
1345 2, 67 | of Josue to ~Achan, "My son, give glory to the Lord
1346 2, 81 | uncreated Persons, viz. the Son and Holy Ghost. ~Therefore
1347 2, 81 | to them to pray: for the Son said (Jn. 14:16): ~"I will
1348 2, 81 | receives through grace. The Son ~is said to ask or pray
1349 2, 81 | hear ~the prayer which the Son has not inspired." Now in
1350 2, 82 | shall also the coming of the Son of Man be."~
1351 2, 84 | person, ~as in the case of a son who offers to God the means
1352 2, 86 | subject, e.g. of a slave or a son, supposes this condition,
1353 2, 87 | swear by his head, or by his son, or by some other thing ~
1354 2, 92 | himself the image of his son, who was quickly taken away:
1355 2, 93 | drawing lots, found that his son Jonathan had eaten honey (
1356 2, 98 | Holy Spirit ~of Father and Son is a creature and the slave
1357 2, 99 | such: and since he is his son's superior ~through being
1358 2, 99 | relation of principle, and his ~son in the relation of that
1359 2, 99 | a father to support his son: and consequently he is
1360 2, 99 | the other hand, for the son to bestow something on his
1361 2, 102 | Abraham to slay his innocent son (Gn. 22); and the Jews to ~
1362 2, 102 | Abraham to slay his ~innocent son was not contrary to justice,
1363 2, 102 | duties of his service, a son his father in matters relating
1364 2, 104 | of beneficence, which a son receives from his parents ~
1365 2, 104 | to be and to live, the son cannot make an equal repayment,
1366 2, 104 | then it is possible for the son to pay back ~something greater
1367 2, 106 | spareth the rod hateth his son." But the virtue of vengeance ~
1368 2, 106 | for the sin of ~Cham, his son Chanaan was curse (Gn. 9:
1369 2, 106 | crime of high treason a son loses his inheritance ~through
1370 2, 109 | alone ~after sacrificing his son: but by his mouth the Lord
1371 2, 111 | text goes on, "nor am I the son of a ~prophet."~Aquin.:
1372 2, 117 | 15:13) of the prodigal son that he "wasted his substance
1373 2, 117 | the contrary, The prodigal son is held to blame for his
1374 2, 120 | Thou shalt not deem the ~Son of God to be a creature,"
1375 2, 142 | and My ~words, of him the Son of man shall be ashamed,"
1376 2, 145 | is the "Trinity," Father, Son, and Holy Ghost: while the ~
1377 2, 152 | willing to slay his innocent son, ~because he obeyed God,
1378 2, 152 | not deemed right for a son to bathe with his father,
1379 2, 155 | written ~(Ecclus. 3:19): "My son, do thy works in meekness,
1380 2, 155 | written (Ecclus. 10:31): "My son, keep thy soul in meekness."
1381 2, 161 | to Him: "If thou be the Son of ~God, command that these
1382 2, 164 | 27:11): "Study wisdom, my son, and ~make my heart joyful,
1383 2, 169 | written ~(Ezech. 2:1): "Son of man, stand upon thy feet,
1384 2, 169 | shall ~conceive, and bear a son'"; some are "about the past,
1385 2, 169 | sacrifice his only-begotten son, which he nowise would have
1386 2, 172 | Trinity was revealed by the Son of God Himself, according
1387 2, 172 | the ~Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost."~
1388 2, 173 | himself." Now the prodigal son sank into the depths by ~
1389 2, 175 | 4:3,4): "I was an only son in the sight of my ~mother,
1390 2, 175 | Vulg.: 'I was my father's son, tender, and as ~an only
1391 2, 175 | tender, and as ~an only son in the sight of my mother.
1392 2, 175 | a ~father instructs his son.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[177] A[
1393 2, 183 | written (Prov. 6:1): "My son, if thou be surety ~for
1394 2, 184 | tramples ~under foot the Son of God. Hence the Lord complains (
1395 2, 187 | seemingly the subjection of a son to his father is ~greater
1396 2, 187 | Much less therefore can a son set aside the deference
1397 2, 187 | On the other ~hand, the son, through being subject to
1398 2, 187 | warning in the words: 'My son, if thou be surety ~for
1399 3, 1 | give His ~only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth
1400 3, 1 | truth, the Truth itself, the Son ~of God, having assumed
1401 3, 1 | proof of this than that the Son of God should become ~a
1402 3, 1 | Who was predestined the Son of God in power." ~Therefore,
1403 3, 1 | it was necessary that the Son of God should ~become incarnate,
1404 3, 1 | down in Lk. 19:10, "For the Son of Man is come to seek and
1405 3, 1 | man had not sinned, the Son of ~Man would not have come."
1406 3, 1 | man had not sinned, the Son of Man would have ~become
1407 3, 1 | time was come, God sent His Son, made of a woman, made under
1408 3, 1 | God the Father to send His Son." But God decreed everything
1409 3, 1 | was it so ordered that the Son of Man ~should not be sent
1410 3, 1 | is written: "But yet the Son of Man, when He cometh,
1411 3, 1 | with pity, God sent His Son, ~to grant to all remission
1412 3, 1 | 11, "For God sent not His Son ~into the world to judge
1413 3, 2 | times the only-begotten Son ~of God appeared in two
1414 3, 2 | and the same only-Begotten Son and Word of God." ~Therefore
1415 3, 2 | human substance are one Son of God, ~but they are one
1416 3, 2 | all individuals. Now the Son of God did not ~assume human
1417 3, 2 | matter. But in this way the Son of ~God would not have assumed
1418 3, 2 | can it be said that the Son of God assumed human nature
1419 3, 2 | but in the Person of the Son of God.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1420 3, 2 | says (Phil. 2:7) of the Son of God, that He ~was "in
1421 3, 2 | accidentally united to the Son of God.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1422 3, 2 | Essence or ~Nature of the Son of God, for the union did
1423 3, 2 | accrued ~accidentally to the Son of God.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1424 3, 2 | nature was united to the Son ~of God accidentally.~Aquin.:
1425 3, 2 | held the ~Person of the Son of God to be distinct from
1426 3, 2 | distinct from the Person of the Son of ~man, and said these
1427 3, 2 | as all honor shown to the Son ~of God was equally shown
1428 3, 2 | was equally shown to the Son of man, on account of His
1429 3, 2 | account of His union with ~the Son of God; fifthly, "by equivocation,"
1430 3, 2 | this man is God and the Son of God. Now it is ~plain
1431 3, 2 | accidentally united to the Son of God.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[
1432 3, 2 | that the man was really the Son of God, ~but His instrument.
1433 3, 2 | together in one Person of the Son of God. Now, as was said
1434 3, 2 | we can truly say that the Son ~of God, Who assumes human
1435 3, 2 | and we ~do not say the Son of God is human nature.
1436 3, 2 | the human nature to the Son, but not to Himself; and ~
1437 3, 2 | 10) that "man is in the Son ~of God, more than the Son
1438 3, 2 | Son ~of God, more than the Son in the Father." But the
1439 3, 2 | in the Father." But the Son is in the Father by ~unity
1440 3, 2 | essence, and man is in the Son by the union of the Incarnation. ~
1441 3, 2 | nature is not more in the Son of ~God than the Son of
1442 3, 2 | the Son of ~God than the Son of God in the Father, but
1443 3, 2 | respects is more in the Son than the Son in the Father -
1444 3, 2 | more in the Son than the Son in the Father - namely,
1445 3, 2 | Christ, and ~when I say "Son of God"; whereas it is not
1446 3, 2 | suppositum of Father ~and Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[2] A[10]
1447 3, 2 | be in the Person of the Son of ~God. But it is plain
1448 3, 2 | itself in the Person of the Son. Now the ~thing itself is
1449 3, 2 | granted Him to become the Son of God, as ~Photinus held;
1450 3, 2 | this ~man was truly the Son of God, seeing that He had
1451 3, 2 | hypostasis but ~that of the Son of God, according to Luke
1452 3, 2 | thee shall be called the Son of God." And hence every
1453 3, 2 | He ~might be the natural Son of God and of man. But it
1454 3, 3 | fitting for the Person of the Son of God to ~assume human
1455 3, 3 | nature does not make the Son of ~Man to be simply, since
1456 3, 3 | human nature even as the Son, which is erroneous.~Aquin.:
1457 3, 3 | suppositum of the Father and the Son is not ~one. and hence it
1458 3, 3 | we say the Person of the Son became incarnate, so ~also
1459 3, 3 | to the one Person of the Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[4]
1460 3, 3 | except the Person of the Son. For by this assumption
1461 3, 3 | brought about that God is the Son of Man. But it was not becoming ~
1462 3, 3 | Ghost should be said to be a Son; for ~this would tend to
1463 3, 3 | conformable to the image of His Son." Therefore it seems that
1464 3, 3 | except the Person of the Son could have become incarnate.~
1465 3, 3 | 1/1~OBJ 3: Further, the Son is said to be sent and to
1466 3, 3 | the contrary, Whatever the Son can do, so can the Father
1467 3, 3 | would not be one. But the ~Son was able to become incarnate.
1468 3, 3 | it to the Person of the Son. And hence we must say ~
1469 3, 3 | assumed flesh even as the ~Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[5]
1470 3, 3 | Christ is said to be the Son ~of Man, does not constitute
1471 3, 3 | Hence, if the name of ~son were transferred to the
1472 3, 3 | the love of the Father and Son, according to Gal. 4:6: "
1473 3, 3 | sent the Spirit of His Son into your hearts crying,
1474 3, 3 | by the Incarnation of the Son we receive adoptive ~sonship
1475 3, 3 | common bond of Father and Son.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[3] A[5]
1476 3, 3 | not destroy this. But the Son of God ~is said to be sent
1477 3, 3 | A[2]). But the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are not ~
1478 3, 3 | the Incarnation of God the Son it ~follows that whatever
1479 3, 3 | whatever is said of the Son of God is said of the Son
1480 3, 3 | Son of God is said of the Son of ~Man, and conversely.
1481 3, 3 | Father, viz. to beget the Son, would be said of the man,
1482 3, 3 | consequently would be said of the Son of God; and this could not
1483 3, 3 | likewise of the ~Person of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. But
1484 3, 3 | attributed to the ~Person of the Son or Holy Ghost on account
1485 3, 3 | man is ~unbegotten; the Son is man; therefore the Son
1486 3, 3 | Son is man; therefore the Son is unbegotten," it would
1487 3, 3 | cannot conclude that ~the Son is unbegotten, although
1488 3, 3 | can do, that also can the Son do. ~But after the Incarnation
1489 3, 3 | distinct from that which the Son has assumed; for in nothing
1490 3, 3 | power ~of the Father or the Son lessened by the Incarnation
1491 3, 3 | by the Incarnation of the Son. ~Therefore it seems that
1492 3, 3 | after the Incarnation the Son can assume another ~human
1493 3, 3 | in human nature. For the Son of God ~is His Godhead,
1494 3, 3 | fitting that the Person of the Son rather than any ~other Divine
1495 3, 3 | not more fitting that the Son of God ~should become incarnate
1496 3, 3 | But by the Person of the Son ~of God becoming incarnate
1497 3, 3 | to the very Person of the Son what ~was said of the Son
1498 3, 3 | Son what ~was said of the Son in His human nature, as
1499 3, 3 | Father to be less ~than the Son. Hence it seems fitting
1500 3, 3 | rather than the Person of the Son, should have become incarnate.~
1-500 | 501-1000 | 1001-1500 | 1501-2000 | 2001-2380 |